Plastic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
DIMES, University of Bologna, Italy.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Mar;37(3):272-281. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719047. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Reconstruction of complex defects involving nose and close facial units represents an aesthetic and functional challenge. Restoring satisfactory nasal shape, combining aesthetic, nasal function and patent airways is mandatory. In this paper, we describe our approach to total nose defects and we report our 20-year experience in microvascular nose reconstruction.Clinical cases are shown to illustrate different surgical techniques and the evolution of our approach.
Nasal reconstruction procedures were performed on 21 patients between 2000 and 2020 using the radial forearm flap (RFF) or anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. Reported reconstructions included total/subtotal nasal defects, caused by cancer resections. The key point of our approach is the expanded forehead flap for skin coverage. Reconstruction is completed by cartilage grafts to restore nasal framework and to shape nasal tip. Ancillary procedures were needed in some cases to optimize aesthetic outcomes.
Twenty-one patients completed the multistage nasal reconstruction. The RFF flap was used in 56% of the cases ( = 11), while the ALT flap was used in 44% ( = 10) of our case series. No difference has been detected in the number of reconstructive stages required to achieve the final result comparing RFF and ALT reconstruction (3.3 vs. 3.1 reconstructive steps). Ancillary procedures were performed in 7 patients.
Microvascular tissue transfer plays a key role in full-thickness nasal defects restoration. Comparing the two groups, both the RFF and ALT are effective and reliable options in lining reconstruction, although with different indications. Expanded forehead flap, combined to free cartilage graft, is our gold standard to provide external skin coverage to rebuild the nasal framework. According to our current approach, accurate preoperative planning, supported by modern technologic tools, multistage reconstruction, and ancillary procedures are useful to accomplish satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes.
涉及鼻和邻近面部单位的复杂缺损的重建是一个美学和功能挑战。恢复令人满意的鼻形,结合美学、鼻功能和通畅的气道是强制性的。本文介绍了我们对全鼻缺损的处理方法,并报告了我们 20 年来在微血管鼻重建方面的经验。临床病例显示了不同的手术技术和我们方法的演变。
在 2000 年至 2020 年间,使用桡侧前臂皮瓣(RFF)或股前外侧皮瓣(ALT)对 21 例患者进行了鼻重建手术。报告的重建包括因癌症切除而导致的全/部分鼻缺损。我们方法的关键点是额部扩张皮瓣用于皮肤覆盖。通过软骨移植物重建来恢复鼻支架并塑造鼻尖。在某些情况下需要辅助手术以优化美学效果。
21 例患者完成了多阶段鼻重建。RFF 皮瓣在病例系列中的使用占 56%(11 例),而 ALT 皮瓣的使用占 44%(10 例)。比较 RFF 和 ALT 重建,达到最终结果所需的重建阶段数量没有差异(3.3 与 3.1 个重建步骤)。7 例患者进行了辅助手术。
微血管组织转移在全层鼻缺损修复中起着关键作用。比较这两组,RFF 和 ALT 都是衬里重建的有效和可靠选择,尽管适应证不同。额部扩张皮瓣结合游离软骨移植物是我们提供外部皮肤覆盖以重建鼻支架的金标准。根据我们目前的方法,准确的术前规划,结合现代技术工具,多阶段重建和辅助手术有助于实现令人满意的功能和美学效果。