Suppr超能文献

缓释阿片类药物的术后使用:澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院/疼痛医学系立场声明对临床实践的影响。

Postoperative use of slow-release opioids: The impact of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists/Faculty of Pain Medicine position statement on clinical practice.

作者信息

Tan Adeline Ch, Bugeja Bernadette A, Begley David A, Stevens Jennifer A, Khor Kok-Eng, Penm Jonathan

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Department of Pain Management, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020 Nov;48(6):444-453. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20956664. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Abstract

Dose titration with immediate-release opioids is currently recommended for acute pain. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and the Faculty of Pain Medicine released a statement in March 2018 supporting their use in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients; however, the impact of this statement on clinical practice is currently unknown. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare opioid prescribing patterns before and after the release of the recommendations. Data were collected on 184 patients (2017,  = 78; 2018,  = 106) admitted to the Prince of Wales Hospital in November 2017 and 2018, which consisted of demographic data, opioid prescriptions and discharge opioid information. The main outcome is the number of prescriptions of slow-release opioids in 2017 versus 2018 after the recommendations were published. Confounding factors were accounted for using logistic and multiple regression as appropriate. There was a 29% decrease in slow-release opioid prescriptions during hospitalisation ( = 31, 40% versus  = 12, 11%;  < 0.001) and 17% decrease at discharge ( = 20, 26% versus  = 9, 9%;  = 0.02) post-publication. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of slow-release opioids being prescribed postoperatively and at discharge reduced by 86% and 88%, respectively (postoperative period: odds ratio 0.14,  < 0.05; discharge: odds ratio 0.12,  < 0.05). In addition, orthopaedic patients were more likely to receive slow-release opioids, consistent with existing literature. As the use of slow-release opioids has been associated with increased harm and protracted opioid use compared to immediate-release opioids, it is hoped that wider dissemination of these recommendations and a change in prescribing practice can be a step towards overcoming the opioid crisis.

摘要

目前建议对急性疼痛采用即释阿片类药物进行剂量滴定。澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院以及疼痛医学系于2018年3月发表声明,支持在治疗未使用过阿片类药物的患者中使用这类药物;然而,该声明对临床实践的影响目前尚不清楚。开展这项回顾性队列研究是为了比较这些建议发布前后的阿片类药物处方模式。收集了2017年11月和2018年入住威尔士亲王医院的184例患者(2017年78例;2018年106例)的数据,包括人口统计学数据、阿片类药物处方和出院时的阿片类药物信息。主要结局是2017年与建议发布后的2018年缓释阿片类药物的处方数量。使用逻辑回归和多元回归酌情考虑混杂因素。发布建议后,住院期间缓释阿片类药物处方减少了29%(2017年31例,40%;2018年12例,11%;P<0.001),出院时减少了17%(2017年20例,26%;2018年9例,9%;P=0.02)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,术后和出院时开具缓释阿片类药物的几率分别降低了86%和88%(术后阶段:比值比0.14,P<0.05;出院时:比值比0.12,P<0.05)。此外,骨科患者更有可能接受缓释阿片类药物,这与现有文献一致。由于与即释阿片类药物相比,缓释阿片类药物的使用与伤害增加和阿片类药物长期使用有关,希望这些建议的更广泛传播以及处方实践的改变能够成为克服阿片类药物危机的一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验