Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Lebanon.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;200:106333. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106333. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is one of the most common neuro-modulation based approaches for the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy. Despite advances in technology and surgical techniques, hardware infection remains a recognized and feared complication in VNS placement. Management of such infections is scarce in the literature with the majority of data available in case reports. It ranges from immediate removal of the VNS device to conservative treatment with antibiotics in an attempt to salvage the device, particularly in patients who demonstrated significant improvement in seizure frequency and quality of life.
We performed a review of the literature in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify reported cases of salvaged VNS infection. A literature search for relevant English articles was conducted using Medline. References of relevant articles were also reviewed. Articles that comprised an attempt to salvage an infected VNS were included.
We obtained 12 articles describing an attempt to salvage an infected VNS. Out of a total of 62 reported VNS infections and 43 salvage attempts using a variety of antibiotic-based approaches, 17 cases were successfully salvaged and 26 cases failed the salvage attempt and had to be explanted eventually. Moreover, we report a case of an 18-year-old male with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome who presented21 days after VNS placement with a MRSA deep tissue infection. An attempt was made to treat the infection with long-term culture-based intravenous antibiotics, but it recurred three years later with neck wound dehiscence and positive wound culture for the same organism, and ex-plantation was thus performed.
The management of VNS infections remains a dilemma for neurosurgeons. Although the idea of salvaging an infected VNS seems appealing, hardware removal seems to be inevitable despite adequate antibiotic treatment.
迷走神经刺激(VNS)是治疗药物难治性癫痫最常用的神经调节方法之一。尽管技术和手术技术不断进步,但硬件感染仍然是 VNS 放置中公认且令人恐惧的并发症。文献中很少有关于此类感染的管理方法,大多数数据都在病例报告中可用。它的范围从立即移除 VNS 设备到使用抗生素进行保守治疗,试图挽救设备,特别是在那些癫痫发作频率和生活质量明显改善的患者中。
我们根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行了文献回顾,以确定报告的挽救性 VNS 感染病例。使用 Medline 对相关英文文章进行了文献检索。还回顾了相关文章的参考文献。包括尝试挽救感染的 VNS 的文章被包括在内。
我们获得了 12 篇描述尝试挽救感染的 VNS 的文章。在总共 62 例报告的 VNS 感染和 43 例使用各种基于抗生素的方法进行的挽救尝试中,17 例成功挽救,26 例挽救尝试失败,最终不得不进行植入物取出。此外,我们报告了一例 18 岁男性患有 Lennox-Gastaut 综合征,在 VNS 放置后 21 天出现 MRSA 深部组织感染。尝试使用长期基于培养的静脉内抗生素治疗感染,但三年后再次出现颈部伤口裂开和相同病原体的阳性伤口培养,因此进行了植入物取出。
VNS 感染的管理仍然是神经外科医生的难题。尽管挽救感染的 VNS 的想法很有吸引力,但尽管进行了充分的抗生素治疗,硬件移除似乎也是不可避免的。