• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续性股骨头骨骺滑脱的概率分析(PASS评分)

Probability analysis of sequential SCFE (PASS score).

作者信息

Danino Baruch, Singh Satbir, Shi Junxin, Yang Jingzhen, Samora Walter P, Iobst Christopher A, Klingele Kevin E

机构信息

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

The Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel.

出版信息

J Child Orthop. 2020 Oct 1;14(5):387-396. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200080.

DOI:10.1302/1863-2548.14.200080
PMID:33204346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7666801/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to develop a scoring system based on clinical and radiological findings to predict the risk of a sequential slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

METHODS

Paediatric patients with unilateral SCFE and at least two years of radiographic follow-up were screened for inclusion. Medical records were reviewed for multiple variables including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), stability of SCFE, and time to sequential presentation. Radiographic analysis included triradiate physeal status, Risser staging, superior epiphyseal extension ratio (EER), posterior epiphyseal angle (PEA), posterior sloping angle (PSA) and slip severity.

RESULTS

In total, 163 patients (88 male, 54%, 75 female, 46%) met inclusion criteria. Of those, 65 (40%) with a mean age of 11.9 ± 1.3 years developed sequential SCFE at a mean of 9.8 ± 6.4 months after the initial slip. Eight independent variables were statistically different (p < 0.05) between unilateral and sequential groups. Following multivariate analysis, Risser stage and triradiate status were no longer significant and did not influence the strength of the final model (overall area under the curve (AUC) = 0.954) and were consequently excluded. We developed the PASS score using three radiographic parameters using chosen cut-off values that were close to their maximized value and weighted the point value assigned to each parameter based on the strength of predictor.

CONCLUSION

A PASS score of three or higher predicts a high probability of sequential SCFE with 95% confidence and may warrant prophylactic screw fixation. PASS score calculation can be used to predict a sequential SCFE and provide an objective method to determine the utility prophylactic screw fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在基于临床和影像学检查结果开发一种评分系统,以预测继发性股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)的风险。

方法

筛选出单侧SCFE且有至少两年影像学随访资料的儿科患者纳入研究。查阅病历,记录包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、SCFE的稳定性以及出现继发性滑脱的时间等多个变量。影像学分析包括三骨骺骺板状态、Risser分期、上骨骺延伸率(EER)、后骨骺角(PEA)、后倾斜角(PSA)以及滑脱严重程度。

结果

共有163例患者(88例男性,占54%;75例女性,占46%)符合纳入标准。其中,65例(40%)平均年龄为11.9±1.3岁,在初次滑脱后平均9.8±6.4个月出现继发性SCFE。单侧组和继发性组之间有8个独立变量存在统计学差异(p<0.05)。多因素分析后,Risser分期和三骨骺状态不再具有显著性,且不影响最终模型的强度(曲线下总面积(AUC)=0.954),因此被排除。我们使用三个影像学参数开发了PASS评分,采用接近其最大值的选定临界值,并根据预测因子的强度对每个参数赋予的分值进行加权。

结论

PASS评分为3分或更高预测继发性SCFE的可能性很高,置信度为95%,可能需要进行预防性螺钉固定。PASS评分计算可用于预测继发性SCFE,并为确定预防性螺钉固定的实用性提供一种客观方法。

证据水平

II级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/9aec8809acae/jco-14-387-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/d45200931d24/jco-14-387-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/8dc76d8f1003/jco-14-387-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/9a29c5a18485/jco-14-387-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/bc05788a39ee/jco-14-387-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/91fe8f468d4a/jco-14-387-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/9aec8809acae/jco-14-387-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/d45200931d24/jco-14-387-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/8dc76d8f1003/jco-14-387-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/9a29c5a18485/jco-14-387-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/bc05788a39ee/jco-14-387-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/91fe8f468d4a/jco-14-387-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d4/7666801/9aec8809acae/jco-14-387-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Probability analysis of sequential SCFE (PASS score).连续性股骨头骨骺滑脱的概率分析(PASS评分)
J Child Orthop. 2020 Oct 1;14(5):387-396. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200080.
2
Morphologic Features of the Contralateral Femur in Patients With Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Resembles Mild Slip Deformity: A Matched Cohort Study.单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱患者对侧股骨的形态特征类似于轻度滑脱畸形:一项配对队列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):890-899. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000127.
3
Predicting Risk of Contralateral Slip in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Posterior Epiphyseal Tilt Increases and Superior Epiphyseal Extension Reduces Risk.预测单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱对侧滑移的风险:后骨骺倾斜增加和上骨骺延伸减少风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):209-217. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00440.
4
Capital Femoral Epiphyseal Extension May Confer Physeal Stability in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.股骨近端骨骺延长可能为股骨头骨骺滑脱提供骨骺稳定性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Mar;39(3):119-124. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000881.
5
MRI in idiopathic, stable, slipped capital femoral epiphysis: evaluation of contralateral pre-slip.特发性、稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱的磁共振成像:对侧滑脱前期的评估
J Child Orthop. 2018 Oct 1;12(5):454-460. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.170204.
6
Risk Factors for Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Meta-analysis of Cohort and Case-control Studies.对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱的危险因素:队列研究和病例对照研究的Meta分析
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Jul;40(6):e446-e453. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001482.
7
Capital Femoral Epiphyseal Cupping and Extension May Be Protective in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Dual-center Matching Cohort Study.股骨近端骨骺杯状化和延长可能对股骨头骨骺滑脱具有保护作用:一项双中心匹配队列研究。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Aug;40(7):334-339. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001528.
8
Predicting subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an evidence-based approach.预测对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱:一种基于证据的方法。
J Child Orthop. 2020 Apr 1;14(2):91-97. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200012.
9
The alpha angle as a predictor of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.阿尔法角作为对侧股骨头骨骺滑脱的预测指标。
J Child Orthop. 2016 Jun;10(3):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0732-x. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Does skeletal maturity predict sequential contralateral involvement after fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis?骨骼成熟度能否预测股骨头骨骺滑脱固定术后对侧骨骺的相继受累情况?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Oct-Nov;27(7):796-800. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181558bd9.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Subsequent Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Patients With Unilateral Slips.预测单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱患者对侧股骨头骨骺随后发生滑脱的机器学习算法的开发与内部验证
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 May 24;12:100208. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100208. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Idiopathic Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Demographic Differences and Similarities between Stable, Unstable, and Valgus Types.特发性股骨头骨骺滑脱:稳定型、不稳定型和外翻型之间的人口统计学差异与相似性
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;10(9):1557. doi: 10.3390/children10091557.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Risk of Contralateral Slip in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Posterior Epiphyseal Tilt Increases and Superior Epiphyseal Extension Reduces Risk.预测单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱对侧滑移的风险:后骨骺倾斜增加和上骨骺延伸减少风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):209-217. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00440.
2
Capital Femoral Epiphyseal Extension May Confer Physeal Stability in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.股骨近端骨骺延长可能为股骨头骨骺滑脱提供骨骺稳定性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Mar;39(3):119-124. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000881.
3
MRI in idiopathic, stable, slipped capital femoral epiphysis: evaluation of contralateral pre-slip.
The contralateral hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Is there an easy-to-use algorithm to support a decision for prophylactic fixation?
股骨头骨骺滑脱中对侧髋关节:是否存在易于使用的算法来支持预防性固定的决策?
J Child Orthop. 2022 Aug;16(4):297-305. doi: 10.1177/18632521221107748. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
特发性、稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱的磁共振成像:对侧滑脱前期的评估
J Child Orthop. 2018 Oct 1;12(5):454-460. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.170204.
4
Association between body mass index-for-age and slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the long-term risk for subsequent slip in patients followed until physeal closure.年龄别体重指数与股骨头骨骺滑脱之间的关联:随访至骨骺闭合的患者后续发生滑脱的长期风险。
J Child Orthop. 2016 Jun;10(3):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0731-y. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.一路前行:接收器操作特性曲线的评估与解读
Surgery. 2016 Jun;159(6):1638-1645. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
6
Biomechanics of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Evaluation of the Posterior Sloping Angle.股骨头骨骺滑脱的生物力学:后倾斜角度评估
J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Sep;36(6):651-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000512.
7
Radiographic evaluation in epiphysiolysis: possible predictors of bilaterality?骨骺分离的影像学评估:双侧性的可能预测因素?
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(4):203-6. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000400001.
8
Subclinical bilateral involvement of the hip in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a multicentre study.股骨头骨骺滑脱患者髋关节的亚临床双侧受累:一项多中心研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Mar;38(3):477-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2131-y. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
A reduction in body mass index lowers risk for bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.体重指数降低会降低双侧股骨头骨骺滑脱的风险。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2137-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2811-3.
10
Posterior sloping angle as a predictor of contralateral slip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.后倾角度预测股骨颈骨骺滑脱对侧滑移。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 16;95(2):146-50. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00365.