Suppr超能文献

治疗中断对接受质子束治疗的前列腺癌患者生化失败率的影响:来自多机构质子协作组登记处的报告。

Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry.

作者信息

Han James E, Chang John, Rosen Lane, Hartsell William, Tsai Henry, Chen Jonathan, Mishra Mark V, Krauss Daniel, Isabelle Choi J, Simone Charles B, Hasan Shaakir

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;25:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.10.003. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To date, no studies examining the effect of treatment interruptions (TI) with proton beam therapy (PBT) have been published. The goal of our study was to determine the predictors of TI amongst patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with PBT and to determine whether TI are associated with biochemical failure (BF). We hypothesized that any correlation between TI and biochemical control would be more pronounced in high risk groups.

METHODS

Data for 4278 patients with PCa was obtained from the prospectively collected Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) data registry. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to model possible predictors of BF. A subset analysis was performed for high risk patients treated with ADT and PBT. Finally, propensity score (PS) analysis was performed to account for any indication bias caused by lack of randomization.

RESULTS

Total treatment duration (OR, 1.05 [1.04-1.06]; p < 0.001) increased the likelihood of TI on MVA. TI did not have a statistically significant correlation with BF (OR, 1.44 [0.86-2.39]; p = 0.162) amongst PS matched patients. However, on subset analyses of high risk group patients with PS matching, there was a trend towards worse BF in patients with TI (OR 3.85; 95%CI (0.96-15.44); p = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

In the first analysis of its kind, the results suggest that TI in high risk PCa patients treated with PBT and ADT have worse BF rates. Interventions such as increased patient education, proper maintenance of proton facilities, and decreasing total treatment duration with alternative fractionation schedules may help avoid the unintended negative effects on tumor control due to TI. However, future analyses on a larger patient population is needed.

摘要

引言

迄今为止,尚未有关于质子束治疗(PBT)中断治疗(TI)影响的研究发表。我们研究的目的是确定接受PBT治疗的前列腺癌(PCa)患者中TI的预测因素,并确定TI是否与生化复发(BF)相关。我们假设TI与生化控制之间的任何相关性在高危组中会更明显。

方法

从前瞻性收集的质子协作组(PCG)数据登记处获得4278例PCa患者的数据。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析(MVA)对BF的可能预测因素进行建模。对接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)和PBT的高危患者进行亚组分析。最后,进行倾向评分(PS)分析以解释由于缺乏随机分组导致的任何指征偏倚。

结果

在MVA中,总治疗持续时间(比值比,1.05 [1.04 - 1.06];p < 0.001)增加了TI的可能性。在PS匹配的患者中,TI与BF没有统计学上的显著相关性(比值比,1.44 [0.86 - 2.39];p = 0.162)。然而,在PS匹配的高危组患者亚组分析中,TI患者的BF有恶化趋势(比值比3.85;95%置信区间(0.96 - 15.44);p = 0.057)。

结论

在同类首次分析中,结果表明接受PBT和ADT治疗的高危PCa患者中,TI的BF率更差。诸如加强患者教育、妥善维护质子设施以及采用替代分割方案缩短总治疗持续时间等干预措施,可能有助于避免TI对肿瘤控制产生意外的负面影响。然而仍需要对更大规模患者群体进行进一步分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e393/7649394/dc916d388da6/gr1.jpg

相似文献

4
Case-Matched Outcomes of Proton Beam and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Int J Part Ther. 2023 May 18;10(1):1-12. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-23-00002.1. eCollection 2023 Summer.
8
Differences in Patterns of Care and Referral Between Proton and Photon Therapy.
Int J Part Ther. 2024 Apr 22;11:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2023.10.001. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Overall Survival After Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer With Proton Beam Therapy, External-Beam Photon Therapy, or Brachytherapy.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Jun;19(3):255-266.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of treatment interruptions on overall survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Sep 7;115(9):1029-1035. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad127.
2
Treatment Interruptions During Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;11:796496. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.796496. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Cancer statistics, 2020.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Effects of interruptions of external beam radiation therapy on outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb;62(1):116-121. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12675. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
Radiation Treatment Time and Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Aug 1;98(5):1142-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Moderate Hypofractionation in High-Risk, Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Final Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1891-1897. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4189. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7397. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Causes of death among cancer patients.
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):400-407. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw604.
10
Comparison of outcomes and toxicities among radiation therapy treatment options for prostate cancer.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jul;48:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验