Ziadni Maisa, You Dokyoung Sophia, Chen Abby, Wilson Anna C, Darnall Beth D
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Pain Rep. 2020 Nov 11;5(6):e862. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000862. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
Social and interpersonal factors impact the trajectory of chronic pain. We previously developed and validated a 2-factor, 7-item measure to assess interpersonal factors, including relationship guilt and worry and difficulty prioritizing self-care in chronic pain. Here, we confirm the factor structure and examine the sex invariance of the two-factor structure of the CARE Scale-7.
Data were collected as part of routine clinical care at a tertiary pain clinic using the Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry. Patient participants (67% women) were predominantly middle-aged (M = 50.9 years, SD = 17.8), married (55.2%), and White/non-Hispanic (55.7%). Data included demographics, pain characteristics, CARE Scale-7, pain catastrophizing, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System psychological and physical function measures. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure of the CARE Scale, and a stepwise approach to measurement invariances by sex examined configural, metric, and scalar invariance.
Internal consistency of the scale items ensured suitability for factor analyses. Confirmatory factor analysis findings revealed an overall good fit of the 2-factor model among males and females and that CARE Scale-7 is in fact sex invariant. Finally, CARE Scale-7 showed convergent validity with pain-related outcomes.
The CARE Scale is the first validated instrument to assess self-care in both sexes among patients with chronic pain. The subscale of difficulty prioritizing self-care emerged as a potentially unique factor that should be integrated in clinical assessment. CARE Scale may facilitate standardized measurement in research and clinical contexts, which may inform a comprehensive treatment focus that integrates individualized self-care planning.
社会和人际因素会影响慢性疼痛的发展轨迹。我们之前开发并验证了一种包含两个因子、7个条目的测量工具,用于评估人际因素,包括关系内疚与担忧以及在慢性疼痛中难以将自我护理置于优先地位。在此,我们确认该因子结构,并检验CARE量表-7两因子结构的性别不变性。
数据收集于一家三级疼痛诊所的常规临床护理,使用协作健康结果信息登记系统。患者参与者(67%为女性)主要为中年(M = 50.9岁,标准差 = 17.8),已婚(55.2%),白人/非西班牙裔(55.7%)。数据包括人口统计学信息、疼痛特征、CARE量表-7、疼痛灾难化以及患者报告结果测量信息系统的心理和生理功能测量指标。进行验证性因子分析以验证CARE量表的因子结构,并采用逐步法按性别检验构型不变性、度量不变性和标量不变性。
量表条目的内部一致性确保了适合进行因子分析。验证性因子分析结果显示,两因子模型在男性和女性中总体拟合良好,且CARE量表-7实际上具有性别不变性。最后,CARE量表-7与疼痛相关结果显示出收敛效度。
CARE量表是首个经验证的用于评估慢性疼痛患者中两性自我护理情况的工具。难以将自我护理置于优先地位这一亚量表成为一个可能独特的因素,应纳入临床评估。CARE量表可能有助于在研究和临床环境中进行标准化测量,这可为整合个性化自我护理计划的综合治疗重点提供参考。