Suppr超能文献

伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。

Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare & Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare & Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of, and perform confirmatory factor analysis of, the Persian version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) for Iranian people with nonspecific chronic neck pain.

METHODS

We performed psychometric testing of the Persian version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Participants were 123 native Persian speakers with chronic neck pain lasting at least 3 months. They were between 18 and 55 years old. The CSQ was administered by self-report. After 5 to 7 days, 94 participants completed the questionnaire in the retest session. Confirmatory factor analysis was done to assess the model fit (χ test, comparative fit index, and root-mean-square error of approximation) of the 7-factor solution of the Persian version of the CSQ. The Cronbach α was used for internal consistency; intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change for reliability; and nonparametric tests of group differences and correlations for construct validity. To assess the construct validity, we examined the ability of the CSQ to discriminate people based on sex, level of education, and physical activity. Correlations with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, visual analog scale, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Neck Disability Index were also determined to test the validity.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis measures-χ test, comparative fit index, and root-mean-square error of approximation-were 1.72, 0.76, and 0.07, respectively. Internal consistency was excellent (0.85). All intraclass correlation coefficients were above the acceptable level of 0.70, with the highest reliability obtained for the Praying subscale in both test and retest sessions. The standard error of measurement for the CSQ total score was 2.26, and the minimal detectable change was 6.25. The Cronbach α for the total score and for the subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.93. Scores of the subscales of the CSQ and other questionnaires showed low correlation except for the physical component of the SF-12. The Catastrophizing subscale had a positive correlation with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Neck Disability Index, and a negative correlation with the SF-12.

CONCLUSION

The CSQ has acceptable and good measurement properties to assess coping strategies in Iranian people with nonspecific chronic neck pain. It is a reliable measure, though, for validity only The Catastrophizing subscale showed significant correlation with other scales, but the findings should be interpreted with caution because of the limitations of the study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛患者使用波斯语版应对策略问卷(CSQ)的可靠性和结构效度,并进行验证性因子分析。

方法

我们对波斯语版 CSQ 进行了心理测量学测试。参与者为 123 名母语为波斯语、慢性颈痛持续至少 3 个月的伊朗人,年龄在 18 至 55 岁之间。CSQ 通过自我报告进行。5 至 7 天后,94 名参与者在重测时完成了问卷。验证性因子分析用于评估波斯语版 CSQ 的 7 因素模型拟合(χ检验、比较拟合指数和近似均方根误差)。Cronbach α 用于内部一致性;组间差异的非参数检验和相关性用于结构效度。内类相关系数、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化用于可靠性;与简明健康调查问卷(SF-12)、坦帕运动恐惧调查表、视觉模拟量表、恐惧逃避信念问卷、疼痛灾难化量表和颈部残疾指数的相关性用于检验效度。

结果

验证性因子分析的衡量标准 - χ检验、比较拟合指数和近似均方根误差分别为 1.72、0.76 和 0.07。内部一致性非常好(0.85)。所有的内类相关系数均高于可接受水平 0.70,其中在测试和重测阶段,Praying 分量表的可靠性最高。CSQ 总分的测量标准误差为 2.26,最小可检测变化为 6.25。CSQ 总分和分量表的 Cronbach α 范围为 0.75 至 0.93。CSQ 分量表和其他问卷的得分除了 SF-12 的生理成分外,相关性都较低。灾难化分量表与疼痛灾难化量表、坦帕运动恐惧调查表、恐惧逃避信念问卷和颈部残疾指数呈正相关,与 SF-12 呈负相关。

结论

CSQ 具有可接受和良好的测量特性,可用于评估伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛患者的应对策略。它是一种可靠的测量工具,但有效性只有灾难化分量表与其他量表有显著相关性,但由于研究的局限性,结果应谨慎解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验