• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为对医疗保险预期支付的一种应对措施的患者转移。

Patient shifting as a response to Medicare Prospective Payment.

作者信息

Carroll N V, Erwin W G

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Care Administration, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

出版信息

Med Care. 1987 Dec;25(12):1161-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198712000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198712000-00005
PMID:3320592
Abstract

The Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS) regulations provide hospitals with strong incentives to discharge patients sooner. It seems reasonable to assume that a large number of these discharged patients may require posthospital care in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Such shifting of patients from hospitals to LTCFs would be evidenced by a sicker population of patients requiring more extensive and intensive treatments in the post-PPS period. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which patient shifting occurred after implementation of the PPS regulations. Data were collected from the medical records of 353 patients admitted to 10 LTCFs in Georgia both before and after the PPS was implemented. Comparisons of the two groups indicated no significant differences in LTCF admitting diagnoses, numbers of patients dying or being readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of LTCF admission, prognosis, or rehabilitative potential. The groups differed to a statistically significant extent on three treatment and health status variables: patients in the post-PPS group were more likely to be incontinent of bladder, to have nasogastric tubes, and to be on dietary supplements. These differences may suggest the beginning of a trend to shift heavier care patients into LTCFs. As a whole, however, the results of this study indicated limited shifting of patients from hospitals to LTCFs in Georgia during the first year after implementation of the PPS regulations.

摘要

医疗保险预付费系统(PPS)规定促使医院更积极地让患者早日出院。可以合理推测,大量此类出院患者可能需要在长期护理机构(LTCF)接受出院后护理。从医院向LTCF转移患者的情况,会表现为在PPS实施后,需要更广泛、更密集治疗的病情更重的患者群体。本研究的目的是确定PPS规定实施后患者转移的程度。收集了佐治亚州10家LTCF在PPS实施前后收治的353名患者的病历数据。两组对比表明,LTCF收治诊断、LTCF入院30天内死亡或再次入院的患者数量、预后或康复潜力方面无显著差异。两组在三个治疗和健康状况变量上存在统计学显著差异:PPS实施后的患者组更有可能出现膀胱失禁、使用鼻饲管和使用膳食补充剂。这些差异可能表明将病情更重的患者转移到LTCF的趋势开始显现。然而,总体而言,本研究结果表明,在PPS规定实施后的第一年,佐治亚州从医院向LTCF转移的患者数量有限。

相似文献

1
Patient shifting as a response to Medicare Prospective Payment.作为对医疗保险预期支付的一种应对措施的患者转移。
Med Care. 1987 Dec;25(12):1161-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198712000-00005.
2
Effect of the prospective-pricing system on drug use in Pennsylvania long-term-care facilities.前瞻性定价系统对宾夕法尼亚州长期护理机构药品使用的影响。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Oct;47(10):2251-4.
3
Medicare prospective payment and posthospital transfers to subacute care.医疗保险预期支付及出院后向亚急性护理机构的转诊
Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):685-98. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00004.
4
Do closed-system hospitals shift care under case payment? Early experiences comparing five surgeries in Taiwan.封闭式系统医院在病例支付模式下会转移护理工作吗?台湾五种手术对比的早期经验
Chang Gung Med J. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):91-101.
5
Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.比较基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的前瞻性支付系统实施前后的护理结果。
JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1984-8.
6
The early effect of Medicare's prospective payment system on the use of medical intensive care services in three community hospitals.医疗保险预期支付系统对三家社区医院医疗重症监护服务使用情况的早期影响。
JAMA. 1988 Dec 2;260(21):3146-9.
7
Case shifting and the Medicare Prospective Payment System.病例转移与医疗保险预付费系统。
Am J Public Health. 1988 May;78(5):553-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.5.553.
8
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate Medical Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes Relating to Costs to Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim Final Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS Payments for Severe Wounds, Modifications of Limitations on Redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board, and Extensions of Payments to MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统和政策变更与2017财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;毕业后医学教育;适用于接受观察服务受益人的医院通知程序;与组织成本和医疗保险成本报告相关的技术变更;关于严重伤口长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统支付的暂行最终规则征求意见稿的最终确定、医疗保险地理分类审查委员会重新指定限制的修改以及向临界接入医院和低容量医院的支付延期。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Aug 22;81(162):56761-7345.
9
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.
10
Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2015 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; reasonable compensation equivalents for physician services in excluded hospitals and certain teaching hospitals; provider administrative appeals and judicial review; enforcement provisions for organ transplant centers; and electronic health record (EHR) incentive program. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统、长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统及2015财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;被排除医院及某些教学医院中医师服务的合理补偿等价物;提供者行政申诉和司法审查;器官移植中心的执行规定;以及电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2014 Aug 22;79(163):49853-50536.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicare's prospective payment system: A critical appraisal.医疗保险的前瞻性支付系统:批判性评估。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):45-77.
2
Activity-based funding of hospitals and its impact on mortality, readmission, discharge destination, severity of illness, and volume of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于活动的医院资金投入及其对死亡率、再入院率、出院去向、疾病严重程度和护理量的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e109975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109975. eCollection 2014.
3
Provider payments and patient charges as policy tools for cost-containment: How successful are they in high-income countries?
作为成本控制政策工具的医疗服务提供者支付与患者费用:它们在高收入国家的成效如何?
Hum Resour Health. 2003 Jul 31;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-1-6.