Suppr超能文献

考察急诊部门的不公平现象:全国数据的描述性分析(2006-2012 年)。

Examining emergency department inequities: Descriptive analysis of national data (2006-2012).

机构信息

Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Dec;32(6):953-959. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13592.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Internationally, Indigenous and minoritised ethnic groups experience longer wait times, differential pain management and less evaluation and treatment for acute conditions within emergency medicine care. Examining ED Inequities (EEDI) aims to investigate whether inequities between Māori and non-Māori exist within EDs in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). This article presents the descriptive findings for the present study.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study framed from a Kaupapa Māori positioning, EEDI uses secondary data from emergency medicine admissions into 18/20 District Health Boards in NZ between 2006 and 2012. Data sources include variables from the Shorter Stays in ED National Research Project database and comorbidity data from NZ's National Minimum Dataset. The key predictor of interest is patient ethnicity with descriptive variables, including sex, age group, area deprivation, mode of presentation, referral method, Australasian Triage Scale and trauma status.

RESULTS

There were a total of 5 972 102 ED events (1 168 944 Māori, 4 803 158 non-Māori). We found an increasing proportion of ED events per year, with a higher proportion of Māori from younger age groups and areas of high deprivation compared to non-Māori events. Māori also had a higher proportion of self-referral and were triaged to be seen within a longer time frame compared to non-Māori.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that there are different patterns of ED usage when comparing Māori and non-Māori events. The next level of analysis of the EEDI dataset will be to examine whether there are any associations between ethnicity and ED outcomes for Māori and non-Māori patients.

摘要

目的

在国际上,原住民和少数族裔群体在急诊医学护理中等待时间更长,接受的疼痛管理存在差异,急性病症的评估和治疗也更少。Examining ED Inequities (EEDI) 旨在调查新西兰(NZ)急诊部门中毛利人和非毛利人之间是否存在不平等现象。本文介绍了本研究的描述性发现。

方法

一项基于毛利人定位的回顾性观察研究,EEDI 使用了 2006 年至 2012 年间新西兰 18/20 个地区卫生局急诊入院的二级数据。数据来源包括来自 Shorter Stays in ED National Research Project 数据库的变量以及新西兰国家最小数据集的合并症数据。感兴趣的关键预测因素是患者种族,描述性变量包括性别、年龄组、区域贫困程度、就诊方式、转诊方式、澳大拉西亚分诊量表和创伤状况。

结果

共有 5972102 例 ED 事件(1168944 例毛利人,4803158 例非毛利人)。我们发现 ED 事件的比例逐年增加,与非毛利人事件相比,毛利人中有更多的年轻人和高贫困地区。与非毛利人相比,毛利人更多地自行转诊,并且被分诊为需要更长时间才能就诊。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在比较毛利人和非毛利人事件时,ED 的使用模式存在差异。对 EEDI 数据集的下一级分析将是检查毛利人和非毛利人患者的种族与 ED 结果之间是否存在任何关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验