Farahani Samieh, Farahani Imaneh, Burckhardt Bjoern B, Schwender Holger, Laeer Stephanie
Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstrasse 1, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Mathematical Institute, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstrasse 1, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Nov 16;8(4):217. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040217.
A modern approach to clinical skill education is the use of educational videos, yet there is a shortage of literature investigating the effect of self-instruction videos (SIVs) in pharmacy students. Therefore, our objective was to investigate whether an SIV is non-inferior compared to face-to-face instruction (FTFI) in acquiring blood pressure measurement skills. The participants in this randomized controlled study were pharmacy students. The control group was taught by FTFI, while the intervention group watched an SIV. Before and after the instruction, the participants' performance was assessed by an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The participants completed a self-assessment survey before each OSCE session. Moreover, the participants' perception and satisfaction were assessed using another survey. The OSCE score and self-assessment score increased significantly from pre- to post-instruction in both groups. The SIV was non-inferior compared to FTFI in terms of the OSCE score, considering a predefined non-inferiority margin of -10%. The participants' self-assessment yielded inconclusive results for non-inferiority. Both instructional approaches were well received. Considering our findings, SIVs might be a valuable option for teaching pharmacy students' blood pressure measurement skills. However, depending on the skill intended to be taught, a combination of an instructional video with instructor-led teaching may be necessary.
临床技能教育的一种现代方法是使用教育视频,然而,研究自我指导视频(SIV)对药学专业学生影响的文献却很匮乏。因此,我们的目标是研究在获取血压测量技能方面,SIV与面对面教学(FTFI)相比是否不劣于后者。这项随机对照研究的参与者为药学专业学生。对照组接受FTFI教学,而干预组观看SIV。在教学前后,通过客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估参与者的表现。参与者在每次OSCE课程前完成一份自我评估调查问卷。此外,使用另一份调查问卷评估参与者的认知和满意度。两组的OSCE分数和自我评估分数在教学前到教学后均显著提高。考虑到预先定义的-10%的非劣效性边际,SIV在OSCE分数方面不劣于FTFI。参与者的自我评估得出了关于非劣效性的不确定结果。两种教学方法都受到好评。根据我们的研究结果,SIV可能是教授药学专业学生血压测量技能的一个有价值的选择。然而,根据想要教授的技能,可能需要将教学视频与教师主导的教学相结合。