Do Thi Huyen Trang, Mizsey Peter, Toth Andras Jozsef
Environmental and Process Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Institute of Chemistry, University of Miskolc, Egyetemváros C/1 108, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary.
Membranes (Basel). 2020 Nov 16;10(11):345. doi: 10.3390/membranes10110345.
It can be stated that in the fine chemical industries, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, large amounts of liquid waste and industrial waste solvents are generated during the production technology. Addressing these is a key issue because their disposal often accounts for the largest proportion of the cost of the entire technology. There is need to develop regeneration processes that are financially beneficial to the plant and, if possible, reuse the liquid waste in the spirit of a circular economy, in a particular technology, or possibly elsewhere. The distillation technique proves to be a good solution in many cases, but in the case of mixtures with high water content and few volatile components, this process is often not cost-effective due to its high steam consumption, and in the case of azeotropic mixtures there are separation constraints. In the present work, the membrane process considered as an alternative; pervaporation is demonstrated through the treatment of low alcohol (methanol and ethanol) aqueous mixtures. Alcohol-containing process wastewaters were investigated in professional process simulator environment with user-added pervaporation modules. Eight different methods were built up in ChemCAD flowsheet simulator: organophilic pervaporation (OPV), hydrophilic pervaporation (HPV), hydrophilic pervaporation with recirculation (R-HPV), dynamic organophilic pervaporation (Dyn-OPV), dynamic hydronophilic pervaporation (Dyn-HPV), hybrid distillation-organophilic pervaporation (D + OPV), hybrid distillation-hydrophilic pervaporation (D + HPV), and finally hybrid distillation-hydrophilic pervaporation with recirculation (R-D + HPV). It can be stated the last solution in line was the most suitable in the terms of composition, however distillation of mixture with high water content has significant heat consumption. Furthermore, the pervaporation supplemented with dynamic tanks is not favourable due to the high recirculation rate in the case of tested mixtures and compositions.
可以说,在精细化工行业,尤其是制药行业,生产过程中会产生大量的废液和工业废溶剂。解决这些问题是一个关键问题,因为它们的处理成本往往占整个工艺成本的最大比例。需要开发对工厂在经济上有利的再生工艺,并尽可能按照循环经济的理念,在特定工艺中或其他地方重复利用废液。蒸馏技术在许多情况下被证明是一个很好的解决方案,但对于含水量高且挥发性成分少的混合物,由于其蒸汽消耗量大,该工艺往往不具有成本效益,而对于共沸混合物则存在分离限制。在本工作中,膜过程被视为一种替代方案;通过处理低醇(甲醇和乙醇)水溶液混合物来演示渗透汽化。在专业的过程模拟环境中,使用用户添加的渗透汽化模块对含醇工艺废水进行了研究。在ChemCAD流程模拟器中建立了八种不同的方法:亲有机渗透汽化(OPV)、亲水性渗透汽化(HPV)、带循环的亲水性渗透汽化(R-HPV)、动态亲有机渗透汽化(Dyn-OPV)、动态亲水性渗透汽化(Dyn-HPV)、混合蒸馏-亲有机渗透汽化(D + OPV)、混合蒸馏-亲水性渗透汽化(D + HPV),最后是带循环的混合蒸馏-亲水性渗透汽化(R-D + HPV)。可以说,从组成方面来看,最后一种方案是最合适的,然而,对含水量高的混合物进行蒸馏有大量的热消耗。此外,由于在测试混合物和组成情况下循环率高,补充动态罐的渗透汽化并不有利。