Dagne Asrat Hailu, Ayalew Mequannent Melaku
Midwifery, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Amhara Region, Ethiopia
MPH/RH, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Amhara, Ethiopia.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e039586. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039586.
Research utilisation in clinical decision-making is crucial to enhance quality healthcare, professional development and cost-effective health service. Nurses and midwives have a vital role in research utilisation. However, many factors influence research utilisation of nurses and midwives.
To determine research utilisation and identify factors that affect research utilisation among nurses and midwives.
An institutional-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from 23 May to 30 June 2019. A total of 631 nurses and midwives participated in the study. Categorical variables were coded with dummy variables and multiple linear regression model was carried out. The level of significance was set at p value less than or equal to 0.05 with 95% CI.
Participants' total mean score in the research utilisation scale was 2.27 (SD±0.77) and their mean age was 28.41 (SD±4.71) years. The study revealed that 70.4% (444) of participants had poor research utilisation. Self-efficacy in research utilisation skills (B=0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97), support for research utilisation (B=0.4, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.55), attitude (B=0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.38), barriers to research utilisation (B=-0.63, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.54), nursing/midwifery work index (B=0.07, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.11) and hospital's level of healthcare (B=4.5, 95% CI 2.13 to 6.9) were statistically significantly associated factors of research utilisation.
This study revealed poor research utilisation among nurses and midwives. Barriers to research utilisation, supporting factors for research utilisation, attitude, self-efficacy in research utilisation skills, hospital's level of healthcare and nursing/midwifery work index were found to be statistically significant predictors of research utilisation. The most common barriers to research utilisation were insufficient time and inability to understand statistical terms used in research articles.
临床决策中的研究应用对于提高医疗质量、专业发展和具有成本效益的卫生服务至关重要。护士和助产士在研究应用中起着至关重要的作用。然而,许多因素影响着护士和助产士的研究应用。
确定研究应用情况,并识别影响护士和助产士研究应用的因素。
于2019年5月23日至6月30日进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。共有631名护士和助产士参与了该研究。分类变量用虚拟变量编码,并进行多元线性回归模型分析。显著性水平设定为p值小于或等于0.05,置信区间为95%。
参与者在研究应用量表上的总平均分是2.27(标准差±0.77),平均年龄为28.41(标准差±4.71)岁。研究表明,70.4%(444名)的参与者研究应用情况较差。研究应用技能的自我效能感(B = 0.86,95%置信区间0.75至0.97)、对研究应用的支持(B = 0.4,95%置信区间0.25至0.55)、态度(B = 0.23,95%置信区间0.07至0.38)、研究应用的障碍(B = -0.63,95%置信区间 -0.72至 -0.54)、护理/助产工作指数(B = 0.07,95%置信区间0.04至0.11)和医院的医疗水平(B = 4.5,95%置信区间2.13至6.9)是研究应用的统计学显著相关因素。
本研究揭示了护士和助产士研究应用情况较差。研究应用的障碍、研究应用的支持因素、态度、研究应用技能的自我效能感、医院的医疗水平和护理/助产工作指数被发现是研究应用的统计学显著预测因素。研究应用最常见的障碍是时间不足和无法理解研究文章中使用的统计术语。