Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性随机试验,比较无症状牙髓根尖周病变病例中根尖周器械操作与根管内器械操作的效果。

A prospective randomized trial comparing periapical instrumentation to intracanal instrumentation in cases of asymptomatic pulpal-periapical lesions.

作者信息

Morse D R, Furst M L, Belott R M, Lefkowitz R D, Spritzer I B, Sideman B H

机构信息

Department of Endodontology, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987 Dec;64(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90178-2.

Abstract

To clarify the divergent viewpoints with respect to method of instrumentation in asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical radiolucent lesions (PN/PL), this prospective study was undertaken. The subjects were 106 patients with quiescent cases of PN/PL. Alternately, 53 had periapical instrumentation and 53 had intracanal instrumentation. Prophylactic antibiotics were not administered but the patients were told to take an antibiotic at the first sign of swelling. Flare-ups, non-flare-up-associated swelling and pain, and cases in which there were no postoperative problems were evaluated at 1-day, at 1 week, and at 2 months. A 6.6% incidence of flare-up was found with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (7.5%) and intracanal instrumentation (5.7%). A 27.4% incidence of swelling was found with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (24.5%) and intracanal instrumentation (30.2%). A 43.4% incidence of pain was found, with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (15.1%) and intracanal instrumentation (47.2%). When moderate pain and severe pain were combined, the incidence was 21.7%, with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (15.1%) and intracanal instrumentation (28.3%). An incidence of patients having no postoperative problems of 41.5% was found, with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (47.2%) and intracanal instrumentation (35.8%). When flare-ups were combined with swelling, the incidence was 34.0%, with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (32.1%) and intracanal instrumentation (35.8%). When flare-ups were combined with pain, the incidence was 50.0%, with no statistically significant difference between periapical instrumentation (47.2%) and intracanal instrumentation (52.8%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了阐明关于无症状牙髓坏死及相关根尖周透射性病变(PN/PL)患牙的根管预备方法存在的不同观点,开展了这项前瞻性研究。研究对象为106例PN/PL静止期患者。将患者分为两组,每组53例,分别接受根尖周预备和根管内预备。未给予预防性抗生素,但告知患者出现肿胀迹象时服用抗生素。在术后1天、1周和2个月时评估急性发作、与急性发作无关的肿胀和疼痛以及无术后问题的病例。结果发现急性发作的发生率为6.6%,根尖周预备组(7.5%)和根管内预备组(5.7%)之间无统计学显著差异。肿胀的发生率为27.4%,根尖周预备组(24.5%)和根管内预备组(30.2%)之间无统计学显著差异。疼痛的发生率为43.4%,根尖周预备组(15.1%)和根管内预备组(47.2%)之间无统计学显著差异。当中度疼痛和重度疼痛合并计算时,发生率为21.7%,根尖周预备组(15.1%)和根管内预备组(28.3%)之间无统计学显著差异。无术后问题的患者发生率为41.5%,根尖周预备组(47.2%)和根管内预备组(35.8%)之间无统计学显著差异。当急性发作与肿胀合并计算时,发生率为34.0%,根尖周预备组(32.1%)和根管内预备组(35.8%)之间无统计学显著差异。当急性发作与疼痛合并计算时,发生率为50.0%,根尖周预备组(47.2%)和根管内预备组(52.8%)之间无统计学显著差异。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验