Gutiérrez Nicolas M, Stucchi Luciano, Galeano Javier, Giménez-Benavides Luis
Universidad del Pacífico Lima Perú.
Departamento de Ciencias Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Lima Perú.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 21;10(21):11869-11874. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6837. eCollection 2020 Nov.
We present comments on an article published by Villacañas de Castro and Hoffmeister (Ecology and Evolution, 10, 4220; 2020). The authors studied a tritrophic system composed of a plant, its pollinating seed predator, and a parasitoid of the latter. Their concern was whether the parasitoid modifies the interaction between the plant and its pollinator-herbivore along the mutualism-antagonism gradient, but they reduced their question to how the parasitoid impacts plant fitness. After showing that the parasitoid increases seed output of the plant by decreasing the amount of seeds consumed by the pollinating seed predator, they tested whether seed output is a good proxy for plant fitness. They argue that it is not by showing that the increased seed density has a negative impact on survival probability and flower production, likely due to plant intraspecific competition. The work presented shows careful experimentation and interesting results, but we do not share some of their conclusions. Most importantly, we believe that the net effect of the parasitoid on the plant-herbivore interaction cannot be adequately investigated by focusing on individual plant fitness. Thus, we first suggest considering the number of surviving plants up to adulthood as a proxy for population performance to address this question. Using this proxy, we show that the increase in seed output due to the parasitoid is beneficial to the plant population until its carrying capacity is achieved. Next, using a population dynamics model, we show under which particular conditions the negative effect of intraspecific competition outweighs the positive effect of seed density increase (due to parasitoid's defense). When these conditions do not hold, the role of plant intraspecific competition is basically limited to the prevention of unbounded population growth, while the parasitoid increases the plant's equilibrium density above its carrying capacity as measured when interacting only with the pollinating seed predator, thus making the system more stable.
我们对维利亚卡尼亚斯·德·卡斯特罗和霍夫迈斯特发表的一篇文章(《生态与进化》,第10卷,第4220页;2020年)发表评论。作者研究了一个由一种植物、其传粉种子捕食者以及后者的寄生蜂组成的三营养级系统。他们关注的是寄生蜂是否会沿着互利共生 - 拮抗梯度改变植物与其传粉者 - 食草动物之间的相互作用,但他们将问题简化为寄生蜂如何影响植物适合度。在表明寄生蜂通过减少传粉种子捕食者消耗的种子数量来增加植物的种子产量后,他们测试了种子产量是否是植物适合度的良好指标。他们通过表明种子密度增加对存活概率和花的产量有负面影响(可能是由于植物种内竞争)来论证并非如此。所呈现的这项研究展示了精心的实验和有趣的结果,但我们并不认同他们的一些结论。最重要的是,我们认为仅关注个体植物适合度无法充分研究寄生蜂对植物 - 食草动物相互作用的净效应。因此,我们首先建议将成年存活植物的数量作为种群表现的指标来解决这个问题。使用这个指标,我们表明由于寄生蜂导致的种子产量增加对植物种群是有益的,直到达到其承载能力。接下来,使用种群动态模型,我们展示了在哪些特定条件下种内竞争的负面影响超过种子密度增加(由于寄生蜂的防御)的正面影响。当这些条件不成立时,植物种内竞争的作用基本上仅限于防止种群无限制增长,而寄生蜂会使植物的平衡密度高于仅与传粉种子捕食者相互作用时所测量的承载能力,从而使系统更加稳定。