• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉与镇静中的风险降低——对实现零不良事件的过程改进分析

Risk reduction in anesthesia and sedation-An analysis of process improvement towards zero adverse events.

作者信息

Mitra Manasij, Basu Maitraye, Shailendra Kumar, Biswas Nupur

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, Purab Palli, Kishanganj, Bihar, India.

Department of Biochemistry, MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj. Purab Palli, Kishanganj, Bihar, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):4592-4602. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_722_20. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_722_20
PMID:33209769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7652137/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anesthesia is a complex domain that is highly technical and skill based. Primary Care Physicians often have to do the initial evaluation of surgical patients they encounter during their daily practice before referring them to the surgical team. Thus, the Primary Care Physician's preliminary knowledge in anesthesia processes, risks involved and interventions that can be done to minimize these risks can improve patient-centered care and ultimately patient safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conceptualized and conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology from January 2018 to December 2018 in a 600 bed Multispecialty teaching hospital in Bihar, India. The study aimed towards Anesthesia Care related Risk Identification and Reduction and encompassed process improvements.

RESULTS

Risk Severity Analysis of the Critical Steps of Anesthesia Care was done. The average Hazard Score reduced from 21.59 during January 2018 to March 2018 to 8.23 during April 2018 to June 2018 subsequently to 3.53 during July 2018 to September 2018 and finally to 2.12 during October 2018 to December 2018. Thus, there was an overall reduction of 90.18% in the Hazard Score from April'18 to June'18 quarter to October 2018 to December 2018 quarter.

CONCLUSION

Adverse Anesthesia/Sedation Events reported during the period from January 2019 to December 2019 was "Zero". A systematic approach towards Risk Reduction not only lead to reduction in Hazard Score and Process Improvement but also made the Anesthesia Care Safe which is evident in the consistency of reporting "Zero" Adverse Anesthesia/Sedation Events for the last one year.

摘要

引言

麻醉是一个复杂的领域,高度依赖技术和技能。基层医疗医生在日常工作中遇到手术患者时,通常必须在将其转介给手术团队之前进行初步评估。因此,基层医疗医生对麻醉过程、所涉及的风险以及为最小化这些风险可采取的干预措施的初步了解,能够改善以患者为中心的护理,并最终提高患者安全性。

材料与方法

该研究于2018年1月至2018年12月在印度比哈尔邦一家拥有600张床位的多专科教学医院的麻醉科构思并开展。该研究旨在识别和降低与麻醉护理相关的风险,并涵盖流程改进。

结果

对麻醉护理关键步骤进行了风险严重程度分析。平均危险评分从2018年1月至2018年3月的21.59降至2018年4月至2018年6月的8.23,随后降至2018年7月至2018年9月的3.53,最后降至2018年10月至2018年12月的2.12。因此,从2018年4月至6月季度到2018年10月至12月季度,危险评分总体降低了90.18%。

结论

2019年1月至2019年12月期间报告的不良麻醉/镇静事件为“零”。系统的风险降低方法不仅导致危险评分降低和流程改进,还使麻醉护理更加安全,这在过去一年持续报告“零”不良麻醉/镇静事件中得到了体现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/75470c766cbd/JFMPC-9-4592-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/3198ec27cbb2/JFMPC-9-4592-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/8791d8421b82/JFMPC-9-4592-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/ae8ab944b254/JFMPC-9-4592-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/fb13089c9c65/JFMPC-9-4592-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/ba1f52809f26/JFMPC-9-4592-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/75470c766cbd/JFMPC-9-4592-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/3198ec27cbb2/JFMPC-9-4592-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/8791d8421b82/JFMPC-9-4592-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/ae8ab944b254/JFMPC-9-4592-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/fb13089c9c65/JFMPC-9-4592-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/ba1f52809f26/JFMPC-9-4592-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87b/7652137/75470c766cbd/JFMPC-9-4592-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk reduction in anesthesia and sedation-An analysis of process improvement towards zero adverse events.麻醉与镇静中的风险降低——对实现零不良事件的过程改进分析
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):4592-4602. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_722_20. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A quality improvement project to reduce postoperative adverse respiratory events and increase safety in the postanesthesia care unit of a pediatric institution.一项旨在减少儿科机构麻醉后护理单元术后不良呼吸事件并提高安全性的质量改进项目。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Feb;29(2):200-210. doi: 10.1111/pan.13534.
4
The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.小儿异丙酚镇静/麻醉用于手术室以外操作期间不良事件的发生率及性质:来自小儿镇静研究联盟的报告
Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):795-804. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334.
5
Risk and safety of pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room.非手术室操作中儿科镇静/麻醉的风险与安全性。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Aug;22(4):509-13. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832dba6e.
6
Administration of propofol for sedation of non-mechanically ventilated patients in non-critical care areas by anesthesia providers and non-anesthesia trained healthcare providers: a systematic review.麻醉医护人员和未经麻醉培训的医护人员在非重症监护区域对非机械通气患者使用丙泊酚进行镇静:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(46):2944-2997. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-25.
7
Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events by Pediatric Anesthesiologists at a Tertiary Children's Hospital: Targeted Interventions to Increase the Rate of Reporting.一家三级儿童医院的儿科麻醉医生对围手术期不良事件的报告:提高报告率的针对性干预措施。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1515-1523. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002208.
8
Improved costs and outcomes with conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in TAVR patients: Time to wake up?经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者中,与全身麻醉相比,清醒镇静可改善成本和预后:是时候清醒了?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0173777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173777. eCollection 2017.
9
The Use of Emergency Physicians to Deliver Anesthesia for Orthopaedic Surgery in Austere Environments: The Expansion of the Emergency Physician's General Anesthesia Syllabus to Orthopaedic Surgery.在艰苦环境中使用急诊医师为骨科手术提供麻醉:将急诊医师的一般麻醉课程扩展到骨科手术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 4;100(7):e44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01481.
10
Changing sedation practices in the intensive care unit--protocol implementation, multifaceted multidisciplinary approach and teamwork.重症监护病房中镇静措施的改变——方案实施、多方面多学科方法及团队协作。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;19(2):429-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of preoperative multimedia based video information on perioperative anxiety and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia.术前基于多媒体的视频信息对脊髓麻醉下手术患者围手术期焦虑和血流动力学稳定性的影响。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Jan;10(1):237-242. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1544_20. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse Events in Anesthesia: An Integrative Review.麻醉中的不良事件:一项综合综述。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Oct;34(5):978-998. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
Preventable Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events at a Large Tertiary Care Center: A Nine-Year Retrospective Analysis.大型三级医疗中心可预防的麻醉相关不良事件:一项九年回顾性分析。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Dec;44(12):708-718. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
Design for patient safety: a systems-based risk identification framework.
患者安全设计:基于系统的风险识别框架
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1046-1064. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1437224. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
4
Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned.退伍军人事务部自愿报告的麻醉不良事件及经验教训。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):471-477. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002149.
5
Patient safety in anesthesia: learning from the culture of high-reliability organizations.麻醉中的患者安全:借鉴高可靠性组织的文化
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;27(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Anesthesia and patient safety: have we reached our limits?麻醉与患者安全:我们是否已达极限?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):349-53. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344d90c.
7
Comparison of knowledge of perioperative care in primary care residents versus anesthesiology residents.基层医疗住院医师与麻醉科住院医师围手术期护理知识的比较。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2006 Jul;19(3):216-20. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2006.11928165.
8
Statistical process control methods allow the analysis and improvement of anesthesia care.统计过程控制方法有助于麻醉护理的分析与改进。
Can J Anaesth. 2003 Oct;50(8):767-74. doi: 10.1007/BF03019371.
9
Building a large-scale perioperative anaesthesia outcome-tracking database: methodology, implementation, and experiences from one provider within the German quality project.
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Aug;85(2):271-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.2.271.
10
Overview of anesthesia for primary care physicians.基层医疗医生的麻醉概述。
West J Med. 1998 Jun;168(6):517-21.