Tapping Charles R, Little Mark W, Macdonald Andrew, Mackinnon Tina, Kearns Daniel, Macpherson Ruth, Crew Jeremy, Boardman Phil
Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):436-442. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02702-3. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
To establish factors predictive of success prior to Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) with MRI imaging.
A prospective cohort study of 50 patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) were treated with PAE in a single institution. Patients had moderate to severe symptoms of BPH refractory to medical management for at least 6 months. Patients were imaged with multiparametric MRI imaging pre-PAE and at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-PAE. Clinical success was measured with IPSS, IIEF and EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaires.
The technical success was 48/50 (96%).The mean age of the group was 67 (range 54-83). The mean IPSS score pre-PAE was 21 and at 24 months was 8 (p < 0.001). There was no deterioration in erectile function. The mean volume of the prostate post-PAE was reduced at 3 and 12 months post-PAE but not significantly different at 24 months. This did not correlate with the IPSS score. Patients with median lobe enlargement has similar symptomatic improvement as those without median lobe enlargement. Internally within the prostate patients with adenomatous-dominant BPH initially did better than patients with stromal enlargement; however, at 24 months patients with stromal enlargement of the prostate improved greatest. Initial volume of the prostate was not a good predictor of clinical success.
PAE is a safe and effective treatment strategy for treating men with BPH. Patients with Adenomatous BPH clinically do better until 12 months but not at 24 months. Initial prostate volume does not affect outcome, and patients with median lobe enlargement do as well as those without.
利用磁共振成像(MRI)确定前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)前预测成功的因素。
在单一机构对50例良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者进行前瞻性队列研究,采用PAE治疗。患者有中度至重度BPH症状,药物治疗至少6个月无效。患者在PAE前以及PAE后3个月、12个月和24个月进行多参数MRI成像。通过国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)和EQ-5D-5L生活质量问卷评估临床疗效。
技术成功率为48/50(96%)。该组患者的平均年龄为67岁(范围54 - 83岁)。PAE前平均IPSS评分为21分,24个月时为8分(p < 0.001)。勃起功能无恶化。PAE后3个月和12个月前列腺平均体积减小,但24个月时无显著差异。这与IPSS评分无关。中叶增大的患者与无中叶增大的患者症状改善相似。在前列腺内部,以腺瘤为主的BPH患者最初比基质增大的患者情况更好;然而,在24个月时,前列腺基质增大的患者改善最大。前列腺初始体积不是临床成功的良好预测指标。
PAE是治疗BPH男性患者的一种安全有效的治疗策略。腺瘤性BPH患者在12个月内临床效果较好,但24个月时并非如此。初始前列腺体积不影响治疗结果,中叶增大的患者与无中叶增大的患者效果相当。