Suppr超能文献

[远端胃次全切除术和胃切除术在胃癌患者外科治疗中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析]

[Distal subtotal gastrectomy and gastreectomy in surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis].

作者信息

Panin S I, Postolov M P, Kovalenko N V, Beburishvili A G, Fedorov A V, Bykov A V

机构信息

Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia.

Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Volgograd, Russia.

出版信息

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2020(11):93-100. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202011193.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) devoted to distal subtotal gastrectomy and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with distal gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RCTs were searched in the electronic library, the Cochrane Community database, and PubMed database. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Community experts (Higgins et al. 2019). Mathematical calculations of a meta-analysis were made using RevMan 5.3 software package. Statistical criteria were calculated for relative risk (RR), hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and significance level ().

RESULTS

Seven primary RCTs were selected. A total number of 1463 surgical interventions with D2 lymphadenectomy were observed (805 patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy, 658 - gastrectomy). Postoperative mortality is significantly higher (6.5% and 2.6%) after gastrectomy compared to subtotal distal gastrectomy (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.34-3.64, I 0%, fixed effect model). Postoperative complications are also significantly more common (28% and 14%) after gastrectomy (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.16-2.55, I heterogeneity 49%, random effect model). Differences in overall five-year survival after gastrectomy and subtotal distal resection (51.6% and 60.8%) are insignificant (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.45-1.22, I 90%, random effect model, general reverse inversion).

CONCLUSION

The choice of distal subtotal gastrectomy and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with distal gastric cancer is not regulated by evidence-based medicine. The boundaries of minimal surgical clearance from the tumor edge vary from 2.5 cm to 6 cm. An updated meta-analysis shows that postoperative mortality and morbidity are significantly higher after gastrectomy compared to distal subtotal gastrectomy while overall 5-year survival is similar.

摘要

目的

分析针对远端胃癌患者行远端胃次全切除术及D2淋巴结清扫术的胃切除术的随机对照试验(RCT)。

材料与方法

在电子图书馆、Cochrane协作网数据库和PubMed数据库中检索RCT。根据Cochrane协作网专家的建议(Higgins等人,2019年)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用RevMan 5.3软件包进行荟萃分析的数学计算。计算相对风险(RR)、风险比(HR)、95%置信区间(95%CI)和显著性水平()的统计标准。

结果

选择了7项主要RCT。共观察到1463例实施D2淋巴结清扫术的手术干预(805例患者接受远端胃次全切除术,658例接受胃切除术)。与远端胃次全切除术相比,胃切除术后的术后死亡率显著更高(6.5%和2.6%)(RR 2.2,95%CI 1.34 - 3.64,I² 0%,固定效应模型)。胃切除术后的术后并发症也明显更常见(28%和14%)(RR 1.72,95%CI 1.16 - 2.55,I²异质性49%,随机效应模型)。胃切除术和远端次全切除术后总体五年生存率的差异(51.6%和60.8%)不显著(HR 0.74,95%CI 0.45 - 1.22,I² 90%,随机效应模型,一般反向倒置)。

结论

远端胃癌患者选择远端胃次全切除术及D2淋巴结清扫术的胃切除术不受循证医学的规范。肿瘤边缘最小手术切缘范围在2.5厘米至6厘米之间。一项更新的荟萃分析表明,与远端胃次全切除术相比,胃切除术后的术后死亡率和发病率显著更高,而总体五年生存率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验