• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃癌胃切除术后发病率、死亡率、复发及5年生存率的影响。随机临床试验的Meta分析

Impact of extended lymphadenectomy on morbidity, mortality, recurrence and 5-year survival after gastrectomy for cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Lustosa Suzana Angélica Silva, Saconato Humberto, Atallah Alvaro Nagib, Lopes Filho Gaspar de Jesus, Matos Delcio

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology and Surgery, UNIFOA, Volta Redonda - RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Cir Bras. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):520-30. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502008000600009.

DOI:10.1590/s0102-86502008000600009
PMID:19030751
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare morbidity, mortality, recurrence and 5-year survival between D1 and D2 or D3 for treatment of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Metaview in RevMan 4.2.8 for analysis; statistical heterogeneity by Cochran's Q test (P<0.1) and I(2) test (P>50%). Estimates of effect were calculated using random effects model.

RESULTS

D2 or D3 was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, with RR = 2.13, p=0.0004, 95% CI, 1.40 to 3.25, I(2)=0%, P=0.63; overall morbidity showed higher incidence in D2 or D3, RR = 1.98, p<0.00001, 95% CI, 1.64 to 2.38, I(2) = 33.9%, P=0.20; operating time showed longer duration in D2 or D3, weighted mean difference of 1.05, p<0.00001, 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.38, I(2) = 78.7%, P=0.03, with significant statistical heterogeneity; reoperation showed higher rate in D2 or D3, with RR = 2.33, p<0.0001, 95% CI, 1.58 to 3.44, I(2) = 0%, P=0.99; hospital stay showed longer duration in the D2 or D3, with weighted mean difference of 4.72, p<0.00001, 95% CI, 3.80 to 5.65, I(2) = 89.9%, P<0.00001; recurrence was analyzed showed lower rate in D2 or D3, with RR = 0.89, p=0.02, 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.98, I(2) = 71.0%, P = 0.03, with significant statistical heterogeneity; mortality with recurrent disease showed higher incidence in D1, with RR = 0.88, p=0.04, 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.99, I(2) =51.8%, P=0.10; 5-year survival showed no significant difference, with RR = 1.05, p=0.40, 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.19, I(2) = 49.1% and P=0.12.

CONCLUSIONS

D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy procedure is followed by higher overall morbidity and higher in-hospital mortality; D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy shows lower incidence of recurrence and lower mortality with recurrent disease, when analysed altogether with statistical heterogeneity; D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy has no significant impact on 5-year survival.

摘要

目的

比较D1与D2或D3治疗胃癌的发病率、死亡率、复发率及5年生存率。

方法

对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用RevMan 4.2.8中的MetaView进行分析;采用Cochran's Q检验(P<0.1)和I²检验(P>50%)分析统计异质性。采用随机效应模型计算效应估计值。

结果

D2或D3与更高的院内死亡率相关,RR = 2.13,p = 0.0004,95% CI为1.40至3.25,I² = 0%,P = 0.63;总体发病率在D2或D3中更高,RR = 1.98,p<0.00001,95% CI为1.64至2.38,I² = 33.9%,P = 0.20;手术时间在D2或D3中更长,加权平均差为1.05,p<0.00001,95% CI为0.71至1.38,I² = 78.7%,P = 0.03,存在显著的统计异质性;再次手术在D2或D3中发生率更高,RR = 2.33,p<0.0001,95% CI为1.58至3.44,I² = 0%,P = 0.99;住院时间在D2或D3中更长,加权平均差为4.72,p<0.00001,95% CI为3.80至5.65,I² = 89.9%,P<0.00001;复发分析显示D2或D3中的发生率更低,RR = 0.89,p = 0.02,95% CI为0.80至0.98,I² = 71.0%,P = 0.03,存在显著的统计异质性;复发性疾病的死亡率在D1中更高,RR = 0.88,p = 0.04,95% CI为0.78至0.99,I² = 51.8%,P = 0.10;5年生存率无显著差异,RR = 1.05,p = 0.40,95% CI为0.93至1.19,I² = 49.1%,P = 0.12。

结论

D2或D3淋巴结清扫术之后总体发病率更高且院内死亡率更高;当综合分析统计异质性时,D2或D3淋巴结清扫术显示复发率更低且复发性疾病死亡率更低;D2或D3淋巴结清扫术对5年生存率无显著影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of extended lymphadenectomy on morbidity, mortality, recurrence and 5-year survival after gastrectomy for cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃癌胃切除术后发病率、死亡率、复发及5年生存率的影响。随机临床试验的Meta分析
Acta Cir Bras. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):520-30. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502008000600009.
2
Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.胃癌腺癌扩大与有限淋巴结清扫技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD001964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001964.pub2.
3
Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.胃癌腺癌扩大与有限淋巴结清扫技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD001964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001964.
4
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 2;10(10):CD007585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub4.
5
Roux-en-Y versus Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.远端胃癌切除术后 Roux-en-Y 与 Billroth-I 重建。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD012998. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012998.pub2.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.双膦酸盐类药物在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:一项更新的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):CD003188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003188.pub4.
9
Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults.成人慢性肝病的维生素D补充治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD011564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011564.pub2.
10
Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的近期和远期疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02818-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A robust qualitative transcriptional signature for the correct pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer.一个稳健的胃癌病理诊断正确的转录特征的定性分析。
J Transl Med. 2019 Feb 28;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1816-4.
2
Is There Any Role for D3 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer?D3淋巴结清扫术在胃癌治疗中是否有作用?
Front Surg. 2018 Mar 22;5:27. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00027. eCollection 2018.
3
Evaluation the Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer Treated with Adjuvant or Palliative Chemotherapy.评估接受辅助化疗或姑息化疗的胃癌患者的生存率。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2017 Mar;48(1):31-37. doi: 10.1007/s12029-016-9868-7.
4
Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection.胃癌:淋巴结清扫的现状
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):2875-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2875.
5
Surgical interventions for gastric cancer: a review of systematic reviews.胃癌的外科干预:系统评价综述
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13657-69. eCollection 2015.
6
HNRNPC as a candidate biomarker for chemoresistance in gastric cancer.HNRNPC作为胃癌化疗耐药的候选生物标志物。
Tumour Biol. 2016 Mar;37(3):3527-34. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4144-1. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a critical review.胃癌的淋巴结清扫术:一项批判性综述。
Oncol Rev. 2012 Jun 25;6(1):e12. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2012.e12. eCollection 2012 Mar 5.
8
Adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: current and future directions.胃癌辅助治疗:现状与未来方向
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13718-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13718.
9
Problems faced by evidence-based medicine in evaluating lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.循证医学在评估胃癌淋巴结清扫术时面临的问题。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 28;20(36):12883-91. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.12883.
10
High level of serum AMBP is associated with poor response to paclitaxel-capecitabine chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients.血清 AMBP 水平高与晚期胃癌患者对紫杉醇-卡培他滨化疗的反应不良相关。
Med Oncol. 2013 Dec;30(4):748. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0748-8. Epub 2013 Oct 18.