• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估计在初级保健中提供 2020 USPSTF 预防保健建议所需的时间。

Estimation of the Time Needed to Deliver the 2020 USPSTF Preventive Care Recommendations in Primary Care.

机构信息

At the time the study was conducted, both authors were with the Arnhold Institute for Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Natalie Privett was also with the Department of Health System Design and Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Jan;111(1):145-149. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305967. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305967
PMID:33211585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7750618/
Abstract

To reexamine the time required to provide the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended preventive services to a nationally representative adult patient panel of 2500. We determined the required time for a single physician to deliver the USPSTF preventive services by multiplying the eligible population, annual frequency, and patient-contact time required for each recommendation, all calculated by using data from the recommendations themselves and literature. We modeled a representative panel of 2500 adults based on the 2010 US Census Bureau data. To deliver the USPSTF recommended preventive services across a 2500 adult patient panel would require 8.6 hours per working day, accounting for 131% of available physician time. Compared with 2003, there are fewer recommendations in 2020, but they require 1.2 more physician patient-contact hours per working day. The time required to deliver recommended preventive care places unrealistic expectations on already overwhelmed providers and leaves patients at risk. This is a systems problem, not a time-management problem. The USPSTF provides a set of recommendations with strong evidence of positive impact. It is imperative that our health care system is designed to deliver.

摘要

重新审视为 2500 名具有代表性的成年患者群体提供美国预防服务工作组 (USPSTF) 推荐的预防服务所需的时间。我们通过将符合条件的人群、每年的频率以及每个建议所需的患者接触时间相乘,来确定单个医生提供 USPSTF 预防服务所需的时间,所有这些都是根据建议本身和文献中的数据计算得出的。我们根据 2010 年美国人口普查局的数据,对 2500 名成年患者进行了代表性的模拟。要在 2500 名成年患者中提供 USPSTF 推荐的预防服务,每个工作日需要 8.6 小时,占医生可用时间的 131%。与 2003 年相比,2020 年的建议更少,但每个工作日需要增加 1.2 个医生与患者的接触时间。提供推荐的预防保健所需的时间给已经不堪重负的提供者带来了不切实际的期望,并使患者面临风险。这是一个系统问题,而不是时间管理问题。USPSTF 提供了一套具有积极影响的强有力证据的建议。至关重要的是,我们的医疗保健系统必须能够提供这些建议。

相似文献

1
Estimation of the Time Needed to Deliver the 2020 USPSTF Preventive Care Recommendations in Primary Care.估计在初级保健中提供 2020 USPSTF 预防保健建议所需的时间。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jan;111(1):145-149. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305967. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
The US Preventive Services Task Force: What Is It and What Does It Do?美国预防服务工作组:它是什么以及它做什么?
N C Med J. 2015 Sep-Oct;76(4):238-42. doi: 10.18043/ncm.76.4.238.
3
Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?初级保健:有足够的时间用于预防吗?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.635.
4
Incorporation of Social Risk in US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and Identification of Key Challenges for Primary Care.将社会风险纳入美国预防服务工作组的建议,并确定初级保健面临的主要挑战。
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1410-1415. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12833.
5
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Methods to Communicate and Disseminate Clinical Preventive Services Recommendations.美国预防服务工作组交流和传播临床预防服务建议的方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1S1):S81-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.004.
6
Developing Primary Care-Based Recommendations for Social Determinants of Health: Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.制定基于初级保健的健康社会决定因素建议:美国预防服务工作组的方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):461-467. doi: 10.7326/M20-0730. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
7
Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: refining evidence-based recommendation development.美国预防服务工作组的当前流程:完善基于证据的推荐意见制定。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17;147(2):117-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00170. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
8
Family physicians' disagreements with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.家庭医生对美国预防服务工作组建议的不同意见。
J Fam Pract. 1994 Aug;39(2):140-7.
9
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
10
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Priorities for Prevention Research.美国预防服务工作组预防研究重点。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1S1):S95-S103. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.014.

引用本文的文献

1
IMPLEMENTING HOME-BASED CANCER PREVENTION AND SCREENING: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EQUITY.实施基于家庭的癌症预防与筛查:实现公平的契机。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2025;135:157-168.
2
Nutrition Users' Guides: an introduction to structured guides to evaluate the nutrition literature.《营养用户指南:评估营养文献的结构化指南介绍》
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025 Apr 7;8(1):e000832. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000832. eCollection 2025.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Determining Patient Panel Size in Primary Care: A Meta-Narrative Review.确定初级保健中的患者群体规模:一项元叙事综述
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251321294. doi: 10.1177/21501319251321294.
5
Closing the gaps in adolescent vaccinations: Rhode Island's Vaccinate Before You Graduate program as a model for other jurisdictions.缩小青少年疫苗接种差距:罗德岛州的“毕业前接种疫苗”计划作为其他司法管辖区的典范。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jul 23;45:102837. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102837. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Barriers and Facilitators to Using a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.在基层医疗中使用临床决策支持工具治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和促进因素。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Aug 14;37(3):389-398. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230308R1.
7
Effects of a Patient Portal Intervention to Address Diabetes Care Gaps: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.患者门户干预措施对解决糖尿病护理空白的效果:一项实用随机对照试验的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 28;13:e56123. doi: 10.2196/56123.
8
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2023 Dec 10;195(48):E1674-E1701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237-f.
9
General practitioners' decision-making process to prescribe pain medicines for low back pain: a qualitative study.全科医生治疗下腰痛开具止痛药的决策过程:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 29;13(10):e074380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074380.
10
Quantifying EHR and Policy Factors Associated with the Gender Productivity Gap in Ambulatory, General Internal Medicine.量化电子健康记录和政策因素与门诊普通内科的性别生产力差距的关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(4):557-565. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08428-5. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung Cancer Screening Registry Reveals Low-dose CT Screening Remains Heavily Underutilized.肺癌筛查登记处显示,低剂量 CT 筛查的使用率仍然很低。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 May;21(3):e206-e211. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Optimal Panel Size: Are We Asking the Right Question?最佳面板尺寸:我们问对问题了吗?
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 4;172(3):216-217. doi: 10.7326/M19-3673. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
What Is the Optimal Primary Care Panel Size?: A Systematic Review.最佳初级保健小组规模是多少?:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 4;172(3):195-201. doi: 10.7326/M19-2491. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Powering-Up Primary Care Teams: Advanced Team Care With In-Room Support.增强基层医疗团队实力:提供病房内支持的进阶团队照护。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):367-371. doi: 10.1370/afm.2422.
5
Advancing the Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.推进美国预防服务工作组的方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1 Suppl 1):S1-S3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.012.
6
National assessment of HPV and Pap tests: Changes in cervical cancer screening, National Health Interview Survey.全国 HPV 和巴氏涂片检查评估:宫颈癌筛查变化,国家健康访谈调查。
Prev Med. 2017 Jul;100:243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.2015年美国癌症筛查检测的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Mar 3;66(8):201-206. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1.
8
The Association of Team-Specific Workload and Staffing with Odds of Burnout Among VA Primary Care Team Members.退伍军人事务部基层医疗团队成员中特定团队工作量和人员配备与职业倦怠几率的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):760-766. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4011-4. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
National Rates and Patterns of Depression Screening in Primary Care: Results From 2012 and 2013.初级保健中抑郁症筛查的全国比率及模式:2012年和2013年的结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jul 1;68(7):660-666. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600096. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
10
Addressing Physician Burnout: The Way Forward.应对医生职业倦怠:前进之路。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):901-902. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0076.