从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。

From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.

作者信息

Margolis P A, Stevens R, Bordley W C, Stuart J, Harlan C, Keyes-Elstein L, Wisseh S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina Children's Primary Care Research Group, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7226, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To improve health outcomes of children, the US Maternal and Child Health Bureau has recommended more effective organization of preventive services within primary care practices and more coordination between practices and community-based agencies. However, applying these recommendations in communities is challenging because they require both more complex systems of care delivery within organizations and more complex interactions between them. To improve the way that preventive health care services are organized and delivered in 1 community, we designed, implemented, and assessed the impact of a health care system-level approach, which involved addressing multiple care delivery processes, at multiple levels in the community, the practice, and the family. Our objective was to improve the processes of preventive services delivery to all children in a defined geographic community, with particular attention to health outcomes for low-income mothers and infants.

DESIGN

Observational intervention study in 1 North Carolina county (population 182 000) involving low- income pregnant mothers and their infants, primary care practices, and departments of health and mental health. An interrupted time-series design was used to assess rates of preventive services in office practices before and after the intervention, and a historical cohort design was used to compare maternal and child health outcomes for women enrolled in an intensive home visiting program with women who sought prenatal care during the 9 months before the program's initiation. Outcomes were assessed when the infants reached 12 months of age.

INTERVENTIONS

Our primary objective was to achieve changes in the process of care delivery at the level of the clinical interaction between care providers and patients that would lead to improved health and developmental outcomes for families. We selected interventions that were directed toward major risk factors (eg, poverty, ineffective care systems for preventive care in office practices) and for which there was existing evidence of efficacy. The interventions involved community-, practice-, and family-level strategies to improve processes of care delivery to families and children. The objectives of the community-level intervention were: 1) to achieve policy level changes that would result in changes in resources available at the level of clinical care, 2) to engage multiple practice organizations in the intervention to achieve an effect on most, if not all, families in the community, and 3) to enhance communication between, among, and within public and private practice organizations to improve coordination and avoid duplication of services. The objective of the practice-level interventions was to overcome specific barriers in the process of care delivery so that preventive services could be effectively delivered. To assist the health department in implementing the family-level intervention, we provided assistance in hiring and training staff and ongoing consultation on staff supervision, including the use of structured protocols for care delivery, and regular feedback data about implementation of the program. Interventions with primary care practices focused on the design of the delivery system within the office and the use of teamwork and data in an "office systems" approach to improving clinical preventive care. All practices (N = 8) that enrolled at least 5 infants/month received help in assessing performance and developing systems (eg, preventive services flow sheets) for preventive services delivery. Family-level interventions addressed the process of care delivery to high-risk pregnant women (<100% poverty) and their infants. Mothers were recruited for the home visiting intervention when they first sought prenatal care at the community health center, the county's largest provider of prenatal care to underserved women. The home visiting intervention involved teams of nurses and educators and involved 2 to 4 visits per month through the infant's first year of life to provide parental education on fetal and infant health and development, enhance parents' informal support systems, and link parents with needed health and human services. We included training in injury prevention and discipline, and home visitors assisted mothers in obtaining care from one of the primary care offices.

RESULTS

There were high levels of participation, changes in the organization of the delivery system, and improvements in preventive health outcomes. Agencies cooperated in joint contracting, staff training, and defining program eligibility. All 8 eligible practices agreed to participate and 7/8 implemented at least 1 new office system element. Of eligible women, 89% agreed to participate, and outcome data were available on 80% (180/225). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, intervention group women were significantly more likely than comparison group women to use contraceptives (69% vs 47%), not smoke tobacco (27% vs 54%) and have a safe and stimulating home environment for their children. Intervention group children were more likely to have had an appropriate number of well-child care visits (57% vs 37%) and less likely to be injured (2% vs 7%). Intervention mothers also received Aid to Families with Dependent Children for fewer months after the birth of their child (7.7 months vs 11.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a number of positive effects at all 3 levels of intervention. Policy-level changes at the state and community led to lasting changes in the organization and financing of care, which enabled changes in clinical services to take place. These changes have now been expanded beyond this community to other communities in the state. We were also able to engage multiple practice organizations, reduce duplication, and improve the coordination of care. Changes in the process of preventive services delivery were noted in participating practices. Finally, the outcomes of the family-level intervention were comparable in direction and magnitude to the outcomes of previous randomized trials of the intervention. All the changes were achieved over a relatively brief 3-year study period, and many have been sustained since the project was completed. Tiered, interrelated interventions directed at an entire population of mothers and children hold promise to improve the effectiveness and outcomes of health care for families and children.

摘要

目的

为改善儿童的健康状况,美国妇幼保健局建议在初级保健机构内更有效地组织预防服务,并加强这些机构与社区机构之间的协调。然而,在社区中应用这些建议具有挑战性,因为这既需要机构内部更复杂的护理提供系统,也需要它们之间更复杂的互动。为了改善某一社区预防保健服务的组织和提供方式,我们设计、实施并评估了一种医疗系统层面的方法的影响,该方法涉及在社区、医疗机构和家庭的多个层面解决多个护理提供流程。我们的目标是改善向特定地理社区内所有儿童提供预防服务的流程,尤其关注低收入母亲和婴儿的健康状况。

设计

在北卡罗来纳州的一个县(人口18.2万)进行的观察性干预研究,涉及低收入孕妇及其婴儿、初级保健机构以及卫生和心理健康部门。采用中断时间序列设计来评估干预前后门诊机构中预防服务的比率,并采用历史性队列设计来比较参加强化家访项目的妇女与在该项目启动前9个月寻求产前护理的妇女的母婴健康状况。当婴儿满12个月时评估结果。

干预措施

我们的主要目标是在医疗服务提供者与患者的临床互动层面实现护理提供流程的改变,从而为家庭带来更好的健康和发育结果。我们选择了针对主要风险因素(如贫困、门诊机构中预防保健的低效护理系统)且已有疗效证据的干预措施。这些干预措施涉及社区、医疗机构和家庭层面的策略,以改善向家庭和儿童提供护理的流程。社区层面干预的目标是:1)实现政策层面的改变,从而导致临床护理层面可用资源的改变;2)让多个医疗机构参与干预,以对社区中大多数(如果不是全部)家庭产生影响;3)加强公共和私人医疗机构之间及内部的沟通,以改善协调并避免服务重复。医疗机构层面干预的目标是克服护理提供过程中的特定障碍,以便有效地提供预防服务。为协助卫生部门实施家庭层面的干预,我们在招聘和培训工作人员方面提供了帮助,并就工作人员监督进行了持续咨询,包括使用结构化的护理提供方案,以及提供有关项目实施的定期反馈数据。针对初级保健机构的干预措施侧重于门诊机构内护理提供系统的设计,以及采用“办公系统”方法利用团队合作和数据来改善临床预防保健。所有每月至少登记5名婴儿的医疗机构(共8家)在评估绩效和开发预防服务提供系统(如预防服务流程图)方面都得到了帮助。家庭层面的干预措施涉及高危孕妇(贫困率<100%)及其婴儿的护理提供过程。当母亲首次在社区卫生中心寻求产前护理时,就招募她们参加家访干预,该社区卫生中心是该县为服务不足的妇女提供产前护理的最大提供者。家访干预由护士和教育工作者团队进行,在婴儿出生后的第一年每月进行2至4次家访,提供有关胎儿和婴儿健康与发育的家长教育,加强家长的非正式支持系统,并将家长与所需的健康和社会服务联系起来。我们还包括预防伤害和纪律方面的培训,家访人员协助母亲从其中一家初级保健机构获得护理。

结果

参与度很高,护理提供系统的组织发生了变化,预防健康结果得到了改善。各机构在联合签约、工作人员培训和确定项目资格方面进行了合作。所有8家符合条件的医疗机构都同意参与,其中7/8实施了至少1项新的办公系统要素。在符合条件的妇女中,89%同意参与,80%(180/225)有结果数据。在调整了基线特征的差异后,干预组妇女比对照组妇女更有可能使用避孕药具(69%对47%)、不吸烟(27%对54%),并为孩子营造一个安全且有益的家庭环境。干预组的儿童更有可能接受适当次数的儿童健康检查(57%对37%),受伤的可能性更小(2%对7%)。干预组的母亲在孩子出生后领取抚养儿童家庭援助的月数也更少(7.7个月对11.3个月)。

结论

我们在所有3个干预层面都观察到了一些积极影响。州和社区层面的政策变化导致了护理组织和融资方面的持久变化,从而使临床服务得以改变。这些变化现已从这个社区扩展到该州的其他社区。我们还能够让多个医疗机构参与进来,减少重复,并改善护理协调。参与干预的医疗机构的预防服务提供流程发生了变化。最后,家庭层面干预的结果在方向和程度上与之前该干预措施的随机试验结果相当。所有这些变化都是在相对较短的3年研究期内实现的,并且自项目完成以来许多变化一直持续。针对全体母亲和儿童的分层、相互关联的干预措施有望提高家庭和儿童医疗保健的有效性和结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索