• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量达巴万星与标准治疗方案治疗多地点医疗机构中急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的成本-后果分析。

Cost-Consequence Analysis of Single-Dose Dalbavancin Versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in a Multisite Healthcare System.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Hospital West, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.

Office of Human Research, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1436-e1442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1732.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1732
PMID:33211794
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are common infectious diseases that cause a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of dalbavancin vs standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of ABSSSI in a community-based healthcare system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients with ABSSSI treated with dalbavancin or SoC during a 27-month period. Patients were matched based on age and body mass index. The primary outcome was average net cost of care to the healthcare system per patient, calculated as the difference between reimbursement payments and the total cost to provide care to the patient. The secondary outcome was proportion of cases successfully treated, defined as no ABSSSI-related readmission within 30 days after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 418 matched patients, 209 received SoC and 209 received dalbavancin. The average total cost of care per patient was greater with dalbavancin vs SoC ($4770 vs $2709, P < .0001). The average reimbursement per patient was $3084 with dalbavancin vs $2633 SoC (P = .527). The net cost, calculated as revenue minus total cost, was $1685 with dalbavancin vs $75 with SoC (P = .013). The overall treatment success rate was 74% with dalbavancin vs 85% with SoC (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin was more costly than SoC for the treatment of ABSSSI, with a higher 30-day readmission rate. Dalbavancin does not offer an economic or efficacy advantage.

摘要

背景

急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)是常见的传染病,给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担。本研究旨在比较达巴万星与标准治疗(SoC)在社区医疗系统中治疗 ABSSSI 的成本效益。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了在 27 个月期间接受达巴万星或 SoC 治疗的 ABSSSI 成年患者。根据年龄和体重指数对患者进行匹配。主要结局为每位患者对医疗保健系统的平均净护理成本,计算方法为报销支付与为患者提供护理的总成本之间的差异。次要结局为成功治疗的比例,定义为治疗开始后 30 天内无 ABSSSI 相关再入院。

结果

在 418 例匹配患者中,209 例接受 SoC 治疗,209 例接受达巴万星治疗。达巴万星组每位患者的平均总护理成本高于 SoC 组($4770 比 $2709,P <.0001)。达巴万星组每位患者的平均报销额为$3084,SoC 组为$2633(P =.527)。达巴万星组的净成本(收入减去总成本)为$1685,SoC 组为$75(P =.013)。达巴万星组的整体治疗成功率为 74%,SoC 组为 85%(P =.004)。

结论

达巴万星治疗 ABSSSI 的成本高于 SoC,30 天再入院率更高。达巴万星在经济或疗效方面没有优势。

相似文献

1
Cost-Consequence Analysis of Single-Dose Dalbavancin Versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in a Multisite Healthcare System.单剂量达巴万星与标准治疗方案治疗多地点医疗机构中急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的成本-后果分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1436-e1442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1732.
2
A cost-minimization analysis of dalbavancin compared to conventional therapy for the outpatient treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.一项关于达巴万星与传统疗法治疗门诊急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的成本最小化分析。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Mar;19(4):319-325. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1442439. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Budget Impact Analysis of Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Three European Countries.在三个欧洲国家治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的达巴万星预算影响分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Apr;40(4):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00891-w.
4
Efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and other infections in a real-life setting: data from an Italian observational multicentric study (DALBITA study).达巴万星治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs)和其他感染的疗效和安全性:来自意大利观察性多中心研究(DALBITA 研究)的数据。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 Dec;18(12):1271-1279. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1798227. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
5
REDS study: Retrospective effectiveness study of dalbavancin and other standard of care of the same IV antibiotic class in patients with ABSSSI.REDS研究:达巴万星与其他相同静脉注射抗生素类别的标准治疗方案对急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)患者的回顾性疗效研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Apr;61(4):106746. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106746. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
Financial Analysis of Dalbavancin for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections for Self-Pay Patients.达巴万星用于自付患者急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的财务分析
Infect Dis Ther. 2020 Dec;9(4):1043-1053. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00347-w. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
Single Intravenous Dose Dalbavancin Pathway for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Considerations for Emergency Department Implementation and Cost Savings.单剂静脉注射达巴万星治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的途径:急诊科实施和节省成本的考虑因素。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):e217-e229. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Economic evaluation of the treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) from the national payer perspective: introduction of a new treatment to the patient journey. A simulation of three European countries.从国家支付方角度评估急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs)的治疗经济学:为患者治疗路径引入一种新疗法。对三个欧洲国家的模拟。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Oct;19(5):581-599. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1569516. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection.单剂量与每周一次达巴万星治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的随机临床试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;62(5):545-51. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ982. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
10
The role of dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs).达巴万星在治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs)中的作用。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):415-422. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1746643. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Oritavancin and Dalbavancin More Cost Effective for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center?在一家退伍军人事务医疗中心,奥利万星和达巴万星用于门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗时成本效益更高吗?
Fed Pract. 2025 Jun;42(6):236-243b. doi: 10.12788/fp.0571. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Cost-analysis from real-world REDS study on dalbavancin in inpatient treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.来自真实世界REDS研究的达巴万星治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染住院患者的成本分析。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 9;12:151-157. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2025.3363. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Cost analysis of dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in two Italian hospitals.
在两家意大利医院中,达巴万星与标准治疗方案治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs)的成本分析。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Apr 19;5(2):dlad044. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad044. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Evaluation of Dalbavancin Use on Clinical Outcomes, Cost-Savings, and Adherence at a Large Safety Net Hospital.在一家大型医疗保障机构评估达巴万星的临床疗效、节省成本和患者依从性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0238522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02385-22. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
Current and future options for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections: focus on fluoroquinolones and long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics.治疗复杂皮肤和软组织感染的当前和未来选择:重点关注氟喹诺酮类药物和长效糖肽类抗生素。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 22;76(Suppl 4):iv9-iv22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab351.
6
Dalbavancin for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.达巴万星治疗人工关节感染:一项叙述性综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 31;10(6):656. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060656.