Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 4, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103789. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Cultural competence is a key component of culturally congruent nursing care. In order to reduce healthcare inequalities and to identify potentials for improvement in nursing practice, researchers need to be able to assess cultural competence properly. Although many instruments for the assessment of cultural competence have been developed, their measurement properties have not yet been reviewed systematically. Such an overview of existing instruments, however, would allow researchers to identify the most valid and reliable instrument for nursing practice.
The purpose of conducting this review is to identify and critically appraise the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses.
A systematic literature search was performed in November 2019 in the following electronic databases: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed. Studies that were conducted to assess any measurement property of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses were included. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and assessed the risk of bias using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. The quality of included instruments was assessed on the basis of the updated criteria for good measurement properties, and the quality of the summarised results was graded based on the principles of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
In total, 44 studies describing 21 instruments were included in this study. We found that most instruments were tested for at least some forms of validity, but seldom for reliability. The quality of the psychometric properties was evaluated using the criteria for good measurement properties for the following: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error and construct validity. No studies were found in which cross-cultural validity, criterion validity, or the responsiveness of the included instruments were evaluated. The Transcultural Self-Efficacy Tool, the Cultural Competence Assessment, and the Cultural Competence Health Practitioner Assessment showed sufficient levels of quality for psychometric properties and can be recommended for the assessment of cultural competence in nurses.
Given the broad availability of self-administered instruments to assess cultural competence, the development of new instrument is not recommended. A particular need was identified to conduct further psychometric evaluation studies on existing instruments and to adapt them accordingly, and especially on less frequently evaluated properties, such as reliability, measurement error and responsiveness.
文化能力是文化一致护理的关键组成部分。为了减少医疗保健方面的不平等,并确定改进护理实践的潜力,研究人员需要能够正确评估文化能力。尽管已经开发出许多评估文化能力的工具,但尚未对其测量特性进行系统审查。然而,对现有工具进行这样的概述将使研究人员能够确定最有效和可靠的护理实践工具。
进行此综述的目的是确定和批判性评估用于衡量护士文化能力的工具的心理测量特性。
2019 年 11 月,在以下电子数据库中进行了系统文献检索:护理学和相关健康文献累积索引、Embase、PsycINFO 和 PubMed。纳入了旨在评估用于衡量护士文化能力的工具的任何测量特性的研究。两位审查员独立筛选文章,并使用共识标准选择健康测量工具清单评估偏倚风险。根据良好测量特性的更新标准评估纳入工具的质量,并根据推荐评估、制定和评估的原则对总结结果的质量进行分级。
本研究共纳入 44 项研究,描述了 21 种工具。我们发现,大多数工具至少经过了一些形式的有效性测试,但很少进行可靠性测试。使用良好测量特性的标准评估心理测量特性的质量,包括:内容有效性、结构有效性、内部一致性、可靠性、测量误差和构念有效性。没有发现评估包括工具的跨文化有效性、效标有效性或反应性的研究。跨文化自我效能工具、文化能力评估和文化能力卫生保健人员评估显示出足够的心理测量特性质量,可以推荐用于评估护士的文化能力。
鉴于有广泛的自我管理工具可用于评估文化能力,因此不建议开发新工具。需要进一步进行心理测量评估研究,以适应现有工具,并特别关注评估较少的特性,如可靠性、测量误差和反应性。