Koelz H R, Aeberhard P, Hassler H, Kunz H, Wagner H E, Roth F, Halter F
Dept. of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987 Nov;22(9):1147-52. doi: 10.3109/00365528708991972.
Low-dose antacid treatment without and with additional ranitidine in the prevention of acute gastroduodenal stress ulceration in high-risk patients was compared in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract before entry and after the 7-day study period. Of 67 patients who entered the study, 56 could be evaluated. Only one patient, allocated to antacid and placebo, had massive acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, arising from a gastric ulcer. Although gastric intraluminal pH was better controlled with additional ranitidine treatment, the occurrence of mucosal lesions did not depend on the assigned treatment. We conclude that there is no significant difference between the two regimens in terms of endoscopically visible lesions and clinical outcome.
在一项随机双盲临床试验中,对高危患者在不使用额外雷尼替丁和使用额外雷尼替丁的情况下进行低剂量抗酸治疗以预防急性胃十二指肠应激性溃疡进行了比较,在入组前和7天研究期后对上消化道进行了内镜检查。在67名进入研究的患者中,56名可进行评估。仅1名分配至抗酸剂和安慰剂组的患者发生了因胃溃疡导致的大量急性上消化道出血。虽然额外使用雷尼替丁治疗能更好地控制胃腔内pH值,但黏膜病变的发生并不取决于所分配的治疗。我们得出结论,就内镜可见病变和临床结局而言,两种治疗方案之间无显著差异。