Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Aug;22(8):1633-1639.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.037. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
The recovery of patients' physical function and the rate at which this occurs are important parameters for evaluating value in post-acute care (PAC). However, no metrics are presently used to compare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) based on the functional recovery rates (FRRs) for patients in their care. The objectives of this study were to examine whether the average FRR differed significantly among SNFs and to compare the FRR to other measures currently used to assess care quality in SNFs.
Retrospective observational study.
3913 patients discharged from hospitals in one health system to one of 10 partner SNFs between January 2017 and September 2019.
The FRR-the difference in Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care 6-Clicks basic mobility score from SNF admission to discharge relative to the SNF length of stay (in days)-was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included metrics from the SNF Quality Reporting Program (functional recovery alone, discharge to the community, and 30-day hospital readmission). Differences in patients' outcomes between SNFs were tested using multiple regression in order to adjust for patient characteristics.
Across the 10 SNFs, the highest adjusted mean FRR was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55, 0.90] and the lowest was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.46) points per day. Two SNFs had an adjusted mean FRR statistically higher, and 2 had an FRR statistically lower, than the sample mean (0.50, 95% CI: 0.48-0.52). SNF rankings varied by metric.
Individual SNFs vary in their mean FRR for patients making it a potentially useful measure of value for comparing SNFs. Standardized measurement and reporting of FRR could be beneficial to patients and their families as they consider specific SNFs for necessary post-acute rehabilitation and to hospital systems seeking to identify high-value PAC providers with whom to partner in collaborative care models.
患者身体功能的恢复及其恢复速度是评估急性后护理(PAC)价值的重要参数。然而,目前尚无用于根据护理患者的功能恢复率(FRR)比较熟练护理设施(SNF)的指标。本研究的目的是检查 SNF 之间的平均 FRR 是否存在显著差异,并将 FRR 与目前用于评估 SNF 护理质量的其他措施进行比较。
回顾性观察性研究。
2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月期间,从一家医疗系统的医院出院至 10 家合作 SNF 之一的 3913 名患者。
FRR-从 SNF 入院到出院时与 SNF 住院时间(以天为单位)相关的活动后护理 6 次点击基本移动评分的差异-是主要结果。次要结果包括 SNF 质量报告计划(功能恢复、出院到社区和 30 天内医院再入院)的指标。为了调整患者特征,使用多元回归测试 SNF 之间患者结局的差异。
在 10 家 SNF 中,最高调整后的平均 FRR 为 0.70 [95%置信区间(CI):0.55,0.90],最低为 0.39(95% CI:0.33,0.46)每天点。有两个 SNF 的调整后平均 FRR 统计学上更高,有两个 SNF 的 FRR 统计学上更低,低于样本平均值(0.50,95%CI:0.48-0.52)。SNF 排名因指标而异。
个别 SNF 之间患者的平均 FRR 存在差异,这使其成为比较 SNF 的潜在有用的价值衡量标准。FRR 的标准化测量和报告可以使患者及其家属受益,因为他们考虑特定的 SNF 进行必要的急性后康复,并使医院系统能够识别具有合作护理模式的高价值 PAC 提供者。