Madi Naïma, Vos Michiel, Murall Carmen Lia, Legendre Pierre, Shapiro B Jesse
Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Elife. 2020 Nov 20;9:e58999. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58999.
Microbes are embedded in complex communities where they engage in a wide array of intra- and inter-specific interactions. The extent to which these interactions drive or impede microbiome diversity is not well understood. Historically, two contrasting hypotheses have been suggested to explain how species interactions could influence diversity. 'Ecological Controls' (EC) predicts a negative relationship, where the evolution or migration of novel types is constrained as niches become filled. In contrast, 'Diversity Begets Diversity' (DBD) predicts a positive relationship, with existing diversity promoting the accumulation of further diversity via niche construction and other interactions. Using high-throughput amplicon sequencing data from the Earth Microbiome Project, we provide evidence that DBD is strongest in low-diversity biomes, but weaker in more diverse biomes, consistent with biotic interactions initially favouring the accumulation of diversity (as predicted by DBD). However, as niches become increasingly filled, diversity hits a plateau (as predicted by EC).
微生物存在于复杂的群落中,在那里它们参与各种各样的种内和种间相互作用。这些相互作用对微生物群落多样性的推动或阻碍程度尚未得到充分理解。从历史上看,人们提出了两种截然不同的假说来解释物种相互作用如何影响多样性。“生态控制”(EC)预测存在负相关关系,即随着生态位被填满,新类型的进化或迁移受到限制。相比之下,“多样性产生多样性”(DBD)预测存在正相关关系,即现有的多样性通过生态位构建和其他相互作用促进进一步多样性的积累。利用来自地球微生物群落计划的高通量扩增子测序数据,我们提供的证据表明,DBD在低多样性生物群落中最为显著,但在多样性更高的生物群落中则较弱,这与生物相互作用最初有利于多样性积累(如DBD所预测)是一致的。然而,随着生态位越来越被填满,多样性达到一个稳定状态(如EC所预测)。