Suppr超能文献

数字止血带压力的验证:T-RingTM与传统手术手套在人体志愿者中的实验比较。

Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-RingTM and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers.

作者信息

Kim Hyeonwoo, Joo Yoon Ha, Yu Na Hee, Kwon Sung Tack, Lee Jung Chan, Kim Byung Jun

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 20;99(47):e23149. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023149.

Abstract

Digital tourniquets are widely used for the management of digital injuries in emergency departments or outpatient clinics. This study is focused on the pressure analysis of digital tourniquets on some points not covered in the existing literature.A total of thirty volunteers were enrolled in this study. Instantaneous surface pressure was measured at the thumbs, index fingers, and little fingers. We investigated the pressure according to the circumference of digits, tourniquet types, and measurement sites (dorsal and mid lateral volar sides) above the digital vessels. Continuous pressure was measured in artificial silicone models to determine the change of pressure over 2 hours.The average pressure measured on the mid lateral volar side of volunteers fingers were 154.3 ± 54.9 mm Hg by T-Ring and 162.6 ± 61.0 mm Hg by surgical glove. The pressure on the dorsal side were 224.7 ± 57.7 mm Hg by T-Ring and 228.8 ± 66.0 mm Hg by surgical glove, each significantly higher than the mid lateral volar side. The circumference of digits did not significantly affect the surface pressure. The pressure pattern did not change significantly over 2 hours in both tourniquet types.The surface pressure of the mid lateral volar side was significantly lower than that of the dorsal side. However, there was no significant pressure difference according to the circumference of digits. Time dependent pressure change were not significantly different between 2 tourniquets.

摘要

数字止血带在急诊科或门诊中广泛用于处理手指损伤。本研究聚焦于数字止血带在现有文献未涉及的某些方面的压力分析。共有30名志愿者参与本研究。在拇指、食指和小指处测量瞬时表面压力。我们根据手指周长、止血带类型以及手指血管上方的测量部位(掌侧背侧和中外侧)来研究压力。在人工硅胶模型中测量持续压力,以确定2小时内压力的变化。志愿者手指中外侧掌侧通过T形环测量的平均压力为154.3±54.9毫米汞柱,通过手术手套测量为162.6±61.0毫米汞柱。背侧通过T形环测量的压力为224.7±57.7毫米汞柱,通过手术手套测量为228.8±66.0毫米汞柱,均显著高于中外侧掌侧。手指周长对表面压力无显著影响。两种止血带类型在2小时内压力模式均无显著变化。中外侧掌侧的表面压力显著低于背侧。然而,根据手指周长,压力无显著差异。两种止血带之间随时间的压力变化无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e712/7676577/caf7db0d663f/medi-99-e23149-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Variability in local pressures under digital tourniquets.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Jul;39(6):637-41. doi: 10.1177/1753193413492059. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
4
A novel digital tourniquet using a sterile glove and hemostat.
Dermatol Surg. 2004 Jul;30(7):1065-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30314.x.
9
Tourniquets and occlusion: the pressure of design.
Mil Med. 2013 May;178(5):578-87. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00490.
10
Digital tourniquets: a pressure study with clinical relevance.
J Hand Surg Am. 1986 Nov;11(6):865-8. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80239-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Principles of management of hand fractures.
J Perioper Pract. 2023 Nov;33(11):342-349. doi: 10.1177/17504589221119739. Epub 2022 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective study of 100 cases of sterile T-RING™ digital tourniquet application.
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016 Sep;35(4):271-279. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
2
Variability in local pressures under digital tourniquets.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Jul;39(6):637-41. doi: 10.1177/1753193413492059. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
3
Finger tourniquets: a review of National Patient Safety Agency recommendations, available devices and current practice.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Feb;40(2):214-5. doi: 10.1177/1753193412462335. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
4
Arteries of the thumb: description of anatomical variations and review of the literature.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):468e-476e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402d43.
7
Investigation of safety and efficacy of a pneumatic finger tourniquet.
Hand Surg. 2008;13(2):55-9. doi: 10.1142/S0218810408003918.
8
Tourniquet use and its complications in Norway.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Aug;88(8):1090-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17668.
10
Mechanical and biological comparison of latex and silicone rubber bands.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):379-86. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00564-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验