Otago Bowen Therapy, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):271-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
INTRODUCTION: Bowen Therapy, a form of soft tissue manipulation, is commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions; yet, there is little evidence for its efficacy. The goal of the study was to investigate the impact of Bowen Therapy on pain and function in people with chronic pain in multiple locations. Additionally, we examined the mechanisms of effect through monitoring the nociceptive and autonomic nervous systems. METHOD: The study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 31 people with chronic pain. Participants were randomized into real and sham therapy groups. Each group received 6 sessions of therapy over 8 weeks. The primary outcome measures of pain and function were assessed using standard questionnaires. Quantitative sensory testing was used to assess the nociceptive system, while recordings of heart rate variability and skin conductance were used to assess the autonomic nervous system. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 6-weeks following completion of the intervention. RESULTS: The real therapy group had a significantly lower pain score 1-week following the intervention compared to the sham group. There were no differences between groups at the final follow-up or in the function measures. There was no significant change in the nociceptive measures but there was evidence of increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system. DISCUSSION: Bowen Therapy gave rise to a short-term reduction in pain that was not evident in a sham therapy group. The mechanisms of action of Bowen Therapy remain uncertain but may involve sympathoexcitation.
简介: Bowen 疗法是一种软组织手法,常用于治疗肌肉骨骼疾病;然而,其疗效的证据有限。本研究的目的是调查 Bowen 疗法对多处慢性疼痛人群疼痛和功能的影响。此外,我们通过监测伤害性和自主神经系统来研究其作用机制。 方法:该研究是一项双盲、随机对照试验,涉及 31 名慢性疼痛患者。参与者被随机分为真实治疗组和假治疗组。每组在 8 周内接受 6 次治疗。疼痛和功能的主要结局指标采用标准问卷进行评估。定量感觉测试用于评估伤害性系统,而心率变异性和皮肤电导记录用于评估自主神经系统。在干预完成后 1 周和 6 周时评估结局指标。 结果:干预后 1 周,真实治疗组的疼痛评分明显低于假治疗组。在最终随访或功能测量中,两组之间没有差异。伤害性测量没有显著变化,但有证据表明交感神经系统的激活增加。 讨论: Bowen 疗法导致疼痛的短期减轻,而假治疗组则没有这种情况。Bowen 疗法的作用机制仍不清楚,但可能涉及交感神经兴奋。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-4
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017-10
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-4-1
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2023-6-1