The Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
College of Health & Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):503-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
This review evaluated the efficacy and safety of western dry cupping methods for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and reduced range of motion.
A systematic literature search was performed until April 2018 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) pertaining to musculoskeletal pain or reduced range of motion, treated with dry cupping. Outcomes were pain, functional status, range of motion and adverse events. Risk of bias and quality of evidence was assessed using the modified Downs & Black (D&B) checklist and GRADE.
A total of 21 RCTs with 1049 participants were included. Overall, the quality of evidence was fair, with a mean D&B score of 18/28. Low-quality evidence revealed dry cupping had a significant effect on pain reduction for chronic neck pain (MD, -21.67; 95% CI, -36.55, to -6.80) and low back pain (MD, -19.38; 95%CI, -28.09, to -10.66). Moderate-quality evidence suggested that dry cupping improved functional status for chronic neck pain (MD, -4.65; 95%CI, -6.44, to -2.85). For range of motion, low quality evidence revealed a significant difference when compared to no treatment (SMD, -0.75; 95%CI, -0.75, to -0.32).
Dry cupping was found to be effective for reducing pain in patients with chronic neck pain and non-specific low back pain. However, definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness and safety of dry cupping for musculoskeletal pain and range of motion were unable to be made due to the low-moderate quality of evidence. Further high-quality trials with larger sample sizes, long-term follow up, and reporting of adverse events are warranted.
本综述评估了西医拔罐疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛和运动范围受限的疗效和安全性。
系统检索截至 2018 年 4 月的随机对照试验(RCT),研究对象为接受拔罐治疗的肌肉骨骼疼痛或运动范围受限患者。结局指标为疼痛、功能状态、运动范围和不良事件。使用改良的 Downs 和 Black(D&B)清单和 GRADE 评估偏倚风险和证据质量。
共纳入 21 项 RCT,包含 1049 名参与者。总体而言,证据质量为中等,D&B 评分平均为 18/28。低质量证据表明,拔罐对慢性颈痛(MD,-21.67;95%CI,-36.55 至-6.80)和腰痛(MD,-19.38;95%CI,-28.09 至-10.66)的疼痛缓解有显著效果。中等质量证据表明,拔罐可改善慢性颈痛的功能状态(MD,-4.65;95%CI,-6.44 至-2.85)。对于运动范围,与无治疗相比,低质量证据显示存在显著差异(SMD,-0.75;95%CI,-0.75 至-0.32)。
拔罐治疗慢性颈痛和非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛有效。然而,由于证据质量为低至中等,无法得出关于拔罐治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛和运动范围的有效性和安全性的明确结论。需要进一步开展高质量、大样本量、长期随访并报告不良事件的试验。