Suppr超能文献

阿内斯特育入姆因体因的特硕因查特为在因特麦因因因因因因因因特因因因因特因特因因因特因因因特因因因因因因因因因特因因特因因因因特因因特因因因因因因特因因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特因特特

An Investigation into Proteomic Constituents of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Patients with Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Medicated with Opioids- a Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine, St. James Hospital, Dublin and School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland.

Systems Biology Ireland, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;16(3):634-650. doi: 10.1007/s11481-020-09970-3. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

Abstract

The pharmacodynamics of opioids for chronic peripheral neuropathic pain are complex and likely extend beyond classical opioid receptor theory. Preclinical evidence of opioid modulation of central immune signalling has not been identified in vivo in humans. Examining the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients medicated with opioids is required to identify potential pharmacodynamic mechanisms. We compared CSF samples of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain patients receiving opioids (n = 7) versus chronic peripheral neuropathic pain patients not taking opioids (control group, n = 13). Baseline pain scores with demographics were recorded. Proteome analysis was performed using mass spectrometry and secreted neuropeptides were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Based on Gene Ontology analysis, proteins involved in the positive regulation of nervous system development and myeloid leukocyte activation were increased in patients taking opioids versus the control group. The largest decrease in protein expression in patients taking opioids were related to neutrophil mediated immunity. In addition, notably higher expression levels of neural proteins (85%) and receptors (80%) were detected in the opioid group compared to the control group. This study suggests modulation of CNS homeostasis, possibly attributable to opioids, thus highlighting potential mechanisms for the pharmacodynamics of opioids. We also provide new insights into the immunomodulatory functions of opioids in vivo.

摘要

阿片类药物治疗慢性周围神经性疼痛的药效学较为复杂,可能超出经典阿片受体理论的范畴。目前尚未在人类体内发现阿片类药物对中枢免疫信号的调节有临床前证据。需要检查接受阿片类药物治疗的患者的脑脊液(CSF),以确定潜在的药效学机制。我们比较了接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性周围神经性疼痛患者(n=7)和未服用阿片类药物的慢性周围神经性疼痛患者(对照组,n=13)的 CSF 样本。记录了基线疼痛评分和人口统计学数据。采用质谱法进行蛋白质组分析,并通过酶联免疫吸附试验测量分泌的神经肽。基于基因本体分析,与对照组相比,接受阿片类药物治疗的患者中参与神经系统发育和髓样白细胞激活的正向调节的蛋白质增加。接受阿片类药物治疗的患者中,蛋白表达下降最大的与中性粒细胞介导的免疫有关。此外,与对照组相比,阿片类药物组中神经蛋白(85%)和受体(80%)的表达水平明显更高。这项研究表明,中枢神经系统稳态可能受到阿片类药物的调节,从而突出了阿片类药物药效学的潜在机制。我们还提供了阿片类药物在体内的免疫调节功能的新见解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验