文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术诊断胰腺实性肿块:我们需要进行第四次抽吸吗?一项前瞻性研究。

Endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses: Do we need the fourth pass? A prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Department of Pathology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Mar;49(3):395-403. doi: 10.1002/dc.24669. Epub 2020 Nov 21.


DOI:10.1002/dc.24669
PMID:33220130
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is important for the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. Sample adequacy is related to the number of needle passes, and European guidelines recommend three to four needle passes with a standard EUS-FNA needle. We aimed to evaluate the optimal number of passes with standard EUS-FNA needles in solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS: Patients with solid pancreatic masses without cystic component >20% on computed tomography scan, and without biliary metallic stents, or coagulation problems were included prospectively. Standard 22G needles were used (maximum four passes); each sample was paraffin-embedded and analyzed separately. Final diagnosis was established by EUS-FNA, repeat EUS-FNA, surgery, or follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-one of 65 patients were included. The final diagnoses were adenocarcinoma (n = 44, 72%), neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (n = 10, 16%), metastasis (n = 1, 4%) and nonmalignant lesion (n = 6, 10%). Immunohistochemical staining was possible in 17 cases. The diagnosis was established by the first pass in 62% of cases (n = 38), by the second in 15% (n = 9), by the third in 15% (n = 9), and by the fourth in 3% (n = 2). The diagnostic accuracy for all four passes compared to the first three passes was 95% vs 92% (P = .5). The contribution of the fourth pass was not different between adenocarcinoma and NET (2% vs 10%, respectively; P = .667). CONCLUSION: Three passes with standard EUS-FNA was optimal for a specific diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses, regardless of the histological type of the lesion.

摘要

背景:内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对于鉴别诊断实性胰腺病变很重要。样本充足度与针数有关,欧洲指南建议使用标准 EUS-FNA 针进行三到四次穿刺。我们旨在评估标准 EUS-FNA 针在实性胰腺病变中的最佳穿刺次数。

方法:前瞻性纳入 CT 扫描显示无囊性成分>20%的实性胰腺肿块且无胆道金属支架或凝血问题的患者。使用标准 22G 针(最多穿刺四次);每个样本单独包埋和分析。最终诊断通过 EUS-FNA、重复 EUS-FNA、手术或随访确定。

结果:65 例患者中 61 例入选。最终诊断为腺癌(n = 44,72%)、神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)(n = 10,16%)、转移(n = 1,4%)和非恶性病变(n = 6,10%)。17 例可进行免疫组织化学染色。62%(n = 38)的病例在第一次穿刺时即可确立诊断,15%(n = 9)的病例在第二次穿刺时,15%(n = 9)的病例在第三次穿刺时,3%(n = 2)的病例在第四次穿刺时确立诊断。与前三次穿刺相比,四次穿刺的诊断准确率为 95%对 92%(P =.5)。腺癌和 NET 中第四次穿刺的贡献无差异(分别为 2%对 10%;P =.667)。

结论:标准 EUS-FNA 三次穿刺对实性胰腺肿块的特定诊断是最佳的,与病变的组织学类型无关。

相似文献

[1]
Endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses: Do we need the fourth pass? A prospective study.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2021-3

[2]
Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016-12-23

[3]
Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.

Pancreatology. 2015

[4]
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2015-9-29

[5]
22-gauge core 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses.

World J Gastroenterol. 2016-10-21

[6]
Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.

Cytopathology. 2019-3

[7]
Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017-7-19

[8]
Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.

Surg Endosc. 2018-2-5

[9]
Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.

Endoscopy. 2014-12

[10]
Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions.

Pancreatology. 2015

引用本文的文献

[1]
The Utility of Endoscopic-Ultrasonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022-3-19

[2]
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition for small solid pancreatic lesions: Does the size matter?

DEN Open. 2021-9-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索