Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, University of Grande Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, University of Grande Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Londrina State University, Paraná, Brazil.
J Endod. 2021 Apr;47(4):621-630. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
This ex vivo study compared the disinfection and shaping abilities of 2 preparation protocols in C-shaped canals.
Mandibular second molars with type I C-shaped canals were pair matched based on micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) analysis and distributed into 2 groups. The canals were contaminated with a mixed bacterial culture and prepared using 2 protocols, both with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation: XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) supplemented with XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire) (XP-E) and BioRaCe (FKG Dentaire) supplemented with a Hedström file (Dentsply/Sirona, Tulsa, OK) (BR-Hed). Micro-CT scans and intracanal bacteriologic samples were taken before (scan #1 and sample 1) and after preparation (scan #2 and sample 2) and after the supplementary step (scan #3 and sample 3). Canal shaping was evaluated by micro-CT imaging, and disinfection was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Micro-CT data from the XP-E (n = 21) and BR-Hed (n = 23) protocols revealed no significant differences between groups regarding shaping parameters (canal volume, surface area, structure model index, and prepared walls) after preparation and after the supplementary step (P > .05). All these parameters significantly increased after each preparation step (P < .05), except for structure model index changes after the XP-endo Finisher (P > .05). Bacteriologic data from the XP-E (n = 21) and BR-Hed (n = 22) groups showed that 14 (66.7%) and 10 (45.5%) S2 samples still had detectable bacteria, respectively. The corresponding figures for supplementary steps with the XP-endo Finisher and Hedström file were 11 (52.4%) and 10 (45.5%), respectively. Bacterial counts in sample 1 significantly decreased in samples 2 and 3 in both groups (P < .01). Intragroup comparison between sample 2 and sample 3 showed a 66% reduction in counts after using the Hedström file and 18% after using the XP-endo Finisher (P > .05 for both groups). The quantitative bacterial reduction was not different between groups (P > .05).
The XP-endo Shaper and BioRaCe systems have similar disinfecting and shaping abilities in C-shaped canals. Supplementary steps with the Hedström file and the XP-endo Finisher were similarly effective in improving shaping, but this was not sufficient to enhance disinfection. About half of the cases, in both groups, still harbored detectable amounts of bacteria.
本体外研究比较了两种预备方案在 C 型根管中的消毒和成形能力。
根据 micro-CT(微计算机断层扫描)分析,将下颌第二磨牙分为两组,每对磨牙的 C 型根管均为 I 型。将混合细菌培养物污染到根管中,并使用两种方案进行预备,均使用 2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗:XP-endo Shaper(FKG Dentaire,La Chaux-de-Fonds,瑞士),补充 XP-endo Finisher(FKG Dentaire)(XP-E)和 BioRaCe(FKG Dentaire),补充 Hedström 文件(登士柏/Sirona,塔尔萨,OK)(BR-Hed)。预备前(扫描#1 和样本#1)和预备后(扫描#2 和样本#2)以及补充步骤后(扫描#3 和样本#3),分别采集微 CT 扫描和根管内细菌样本。通过 micro-CT 成像评估根管成形情况,通过定量聚合酶链反应评估消毒效果。
XP-E(n = 21)和 BR-Hed(n = 23)方案的 micro-CT 数据显示,预备和补充步骤后,两组在成形参数(根管容积、表面积、结构模型指数和预备壁)方面无显著差异(P >.05)。所有这些参数在每次预备后均显著增加(P <.05),除了 XP-endo Finisher 后结构模型指数的变化(P >.05)。XP-E(n = 21)和 BR-Hed(n = 22)组的细菌学数据显示,S2 样本中仍有 14 个(66.7%)和 10 个(45.5%)样本检测到细菌。使用 XP-endo Finisher 和 Hedström 文件的补充步骤的相应数字分别为 11 个(52.4%)和 10 个(45.5%)。两组中,样本 1 的细菌计数在样本 2 和样本 3 中均显著降低(P <.01)。组内比较样本 2 和样本 3 显示,使用 Hedström 文件后计数减少 66%,使用 XP-endo Finisher 后减少 18%(两组均 P >.05)。组间定量细菌减少无差异(P >.05)。
XP-endo Shaper 和 BioRaCe 系统在 C 型根管中具有相似的消毒和成形能力。使用 Hedström 文件和 XP-endo Finisher 进行补充步骤在改善成形方面同样有效,但这不足以增强消毒效果。两组中约一半的病例仍有可检测到的细菌存在。