• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

禾本科植物适应土壤水分梯度的关键根特性。

Key root traits of Poaceae for adaptation to soil water gradients.

机构信息

Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan.

Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.

出版信息

New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(6):3133-3140. doi: 10.1111/nph.17093. Epub 2020 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1111/nph.17093
PMID:33222170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7986152/
Abstract

Drought and flooding are contrasting abiotic stressors for plants. Evidence is accumulating for root anatomical traits being essential for the adaptation to drought or flooding. However, an integrated approach to comprehensively understand root anatomical traits has not yet been established. Here we analysed the root anatomical traits of 18 wild Poaceae species differing in adaptation to a range of soil water content. Regression model analyses revealed the optimal anatomical traits that were required by the plants to adapt to low or high soil water content. While the area and number of each root tissue (e.g. stele, cortex, xylem or aerenchyma) were not strongly correlated to the soil water content, the ratio of the root tissue areas (cortex to stele ratio (CSR), xylem to stele ratio (XSR) and aerenchyma to cortex ratio (ACR)) could fully explain the adaptations of the wild Poaceae species to the soil water gradients. Our results demonstrate that the optimal anatomical traits for the adaptations to soil water content can be determined by three indices (i.e. CSR, XSR and ACR), and thus we propose that these root anatomical indices can be used to improve the tolerance of crops to drought and flooding stresses.

摘要

干旱和洪涝是植物面临的两种截然相反的非生物胁迫。有证据表明,根系解剖结构特征对于植物适应干旱或洪涝胁迫至关重要。然而,目前还没有建立一种综合的方法来全面了解根系解剖结构特征。在这里,我们分析了 18 种野生禾本科植物的根系解剖结构特征,这些植物在适应不同土壤含水量方面存在差异。回归模型分析揭示了植物适应低或高土壤含水量所需的最佳解剖结构特征。虽然每个根系组织(例如中柱、皮层、木质部或通气组织)的面积和数量与土壤含水量没有很强的相关性,但根系组织面积的比例(皮层与中柱比(CSR)、木质部与中柱比(XSR)和通气组织与皮层比(ACR))可以完全解释野生禾本科植物对土壤水分梯度的适应。我们的结果表明,适应土壤含水量的最佳解剖结构特征可以通过三个指数(即 CSR、XSR 和 ACR)来确定,因此我们提出这些根系解剖学指数可用于提高作物对干旱和洪涝胁迫的耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/c08a9a83ed2b/NPH-229-3133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/aaaf39677f7f/NPH-229-3133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/e42620d53ff1/NPH-229-3133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/c08a9a83ed2b/NPH-229-3133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/aaaf39677f7f/NPH-229-3133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/e42620d53ff1/NPH-229-3133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4f/7986152/c08a9a83ed2b/NPH-229-3133-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Key root traits of Poaceae for adaptation to soil water gradients.禾本科植物适应土壤水分梯度的关键根特性。
New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(6):3133-3140. doi: 10.1111/nph.17093. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
2
Climate-smart crops: key root anatomical traits that confer flooding tolerance.气候智能型作物:赋予耐涝性的关键根系解剖学特征。
Breed Sci. 2021 Feb;71(1):51-61. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.20119. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Root anatomical plasticity contributes to the different adaptive responses of two species to water-deficit and low-oxygen conditions.根系解剖结构的可塑性有助于两种植物对水分亏缺和低氧条件的不同适应反应。
Funct Plant Biol. 2024 Mar;51. doi: 10.1071/FP23231.
4
Root Cortex Provides a Venue for Gas-Space Formation and Is Essential for Plant Adaptation to Waterlogging.根皮层为气体空间形成提供场所,对植物适应涝渍至关重要。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 29;10:259. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00259. eCollection 2019.
5
Response of the root anatomical structure of Carex moorcroftii to habitat drought in the Western Sichuan Plateau of China.中国川西高原嵩草根系解剖结构对生境干旱的响应
Planta. 2024 Apr 23;259(6):131. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04412-3.
6
Drought- and soil substrate-induced variations in root nonstructural carbohydrates result from fine root morphological and anatomical traits of Juglans mandshurica seedlings.干旱和土壤基质引起的根系非结构性碳水化合物的变化源于麻栎幼苗细根形态和解剖特征的变化。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03987-x.
7
Regulation of root adaptive anatomical and morphological traits during low soil oxygen.低土壤氧含量条件下根系适应性解剖和形态特征的调控
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(1):42-49. doi: 10.1111/nph.16375. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Anatomical and physiological responses of roots and rhizomes in Oryza longistaminata to soil water gradients.长雄野生稻根和根茎对土壤水分梯度的解剖学和生理学响应
Ann Bot. 2024 Aug 10. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae131.
9
From phenotyping to genetic mapping: identifying water-stress adaptations in legume root traits.从表型分析到遗传图谱构建:鉴定豆科植物根系性状对水分胁迫的适应机制。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05477-8.
10
Phenotypic plasticity as an index of drought tolerance in three Patagonian steppe grasses.表型可塑性作为三种巴塔哥尼亚草原草抗旱性的指标。
Ann Bot. 2012 Sep;110(4):849-57. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs147. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiation in water adaptation strategy between epiphytic and terrestrial species of , Orchidaceae.兰科附生植物和陆生植物在水分适应策略上的差异。
AoB Plants. 2025 Jun 2;17(4):plaf030. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaf030. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Dual tolerance to soil drought and excess moisture stresses in cowpea genetic resources assessed using multiple indicators.利用多种指标评估豇豆遗传资源对土壤干旱和水分过多胁迫的双重耐受性。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 12;16:1573313. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1573313. eCollection 2025.
3
Intraspecific plant-soil feedbacks alter root traits in a perennial grass.

本文引用的文献

1
Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses.根系组织结构与禾本科植物的生态策略相关。
New Phytol. 2000 Dec;148(3):459-471. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00775.x.
2
Climate-smart crops: key root anatomical traits that confer flooding tolerance.气候智能型作物:赋予耐涝性的关键根系解剖学特征。
Breed Sci. 2021 Feb;71(1):51-61. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.20119. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments.耐淹性:可变环境中的植物性状组合
种内植物-土壤反馈改变多年生禾本科植物的根系性状。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 14:2025.03.11.642669. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.11.642669.
4
Genome-Wide Analysis of the Gene Family in Potato and Functional Verification of Under Drought Stress.马铃薯中 基因家族的全基因组分析及干旱胁迫下 的功能验证
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 6;26(5):2360. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052360.
5
From phenotyping to genetic mapping: identifying water-stress adaptations in legume root traits.从表型分析到遗传图谱构建:鉴定豆科植物根系性状对水分胁迫的适应机制。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05477-8.
6
Reduced Root Cortical Tissue with an Increased Root Xylem Investment Is Associated with High Wheat Yields in Central China.根系皮层组织减少且木质部投入增加与中国中部小麦高产相关。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Apr 11;13(8):1075. doi: 10.3390/plants13081075.
7
Spatial O Profile in and along the Gas Diffusion Pathway under Waterlogging Conditions.淹水条件下气体扩散途径中及沿该途径的空间氧分布。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;13(1):3. doi: 10.3390/plants13010003.
8
The worldwide allometric relationship in anatomical structures for plant roots.植物根系解剖结构的全球异速生长关系。
Plant Divers. 2023 Jun 8;45(6):621-629. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Response to Waterlogging Stress in Wild and Domesticated Accessions of Timothy () and Its Relatives and .梯牧草及其近缘种野生和驯化种质对渍水胁迫的响应 以及 。 (原文中“()”及后面“ 以及.”表述不完整,可能影响准确理解,但按要求逐字翻译如上)
Plants (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;12(23):4033. doi: 10.3390/plants12234033.
10
The allocation of anatomical traits determines the trade-off between fine root resource acquisition-transport function.解剖学特征的分配决定了细根资源获取与运输功能之间的权衡。
Oecologia. 2023 Aug;202(4):845-854. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05443-5. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
Funct Plant Biol. 2009 Aug;36(8):665-681. doi: 10.1071/FP09144.
4
A framework to assess the carbon supply-consumption balance in plant roots.一种评估植物根系碳供应-消耗平衡的框架。
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(2):659-664. doi: 10.1111/nph.16807. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
5
Regulation of root adaptive anatomical and morphological traits during low soil oxygen.低土壤氧含量条件下根系适应性解剖和形态特征的调控
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(1):42-49. doi: 10.1111/nph.16375. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Tolerance of roots to low oxygen: 'Anoxic' cores, the phytoglobin-nitric oxide cycle, and energy or oxygen sensing.根系对低氧的耐受性:“缺氧”核心、植物血球素-一氧化氮循环、以及能量或氧感应。
J Plant Physiol. 2019 Aug;239:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
7
Nonlinearity of root trait relationships and the root economics spectrum.根系性状关系的非线性和根系经济学谱。
Nat Commun. 2019 May 17;10(1):2203. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10245-6.
8
Root Cortex Provides a Venue for Gas-Space Formation and Is Essential for Plant Adaptation to Waterlogging.根皮层为气体空间形成提供场所,对植物适应涝渍至关重要。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 29;10:259. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00259. eCollection 2019.
9
Rightsizing root phenotypes for drought resistance.为抗旱性调整根系表型。
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jun 6;69(13):3279-3292. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery048.
10
Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits.进化历史决定了根系功能性状的全球组织。
Nature. 2018 Mar 1;555(7694):94-97. doi: 10.1038/nature25783. Epub 2018 Feb 21.