抗击新冠疫情。还是，“人人生而平等，但有些人比其他人更平等？”
Combatting Covid-19. Or, "All Persons Are Equal but Some Persons Are More Equal than Others?".
出版信息
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jul;30(3):406-414. doi: 10.1017/S096318012000095X.
Abstract
Vaccines, when available, will prove to be crucial in the fight against Covid-19. All societies will face acute dilemmas in allocating scarce lifesaving resources in the form of vaccines for Covid-19. The author proposes The Value of Lives Principle as a just and workable plan for equitable and efficient access. After describing what the principle entails, the author contrasts the advantage of this approach with other current proposals such as the Fair Priority Model.
摘要
疫苗在对抗新冠疫情方面将被证明是至关重要的。所有社会在分配新冠疫苗等稀缺救生资源时，都将面临严峻的两难困境。作者提出了“生命价值原则”，作为公平、高效获取疫苗的公正可行方案。在描述了该原则所包含的内容之后，作者对比了这种方法相对于其他当前建议（如公平优先模型）的优势。
相似文献
1
Combatting Covid-19. Or, "All Persons Are Equal but Some Persons Are More Equal than Others?".抗击新冠疫情。还是，“人人生而平等，但有些人比其他人更平等？”
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jul;30(3):406-414. doi: 10.1017/S096318012000095X.
2
A Reserve System for the Equitable Allocation of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine.一种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2疫苗公平分配的储备系统。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1292-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2042. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
3
Scientific and Ethical Principles Underlying Recommendations From the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for COVID-19 Vaccination Implementation.免疫实践咨询委员会关于新冠病毒疫苗接种实施建议所依据的科学和伦理原则。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2025-2026. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20847.
4
Rationing of Civilian Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccines While Supplies Are Limited.2019年新型冠状病毒病疫苗在供应有限时的分配
J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 9;222(11):1776-1779. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa569.
5
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Ethical Principles for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine-United States, 2020.美国免疫实践咨询委员会关于2020年分配COVID-19疫苗初始供应的伦理原则
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):420-425. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16437.
6
COVID-19 vaccine allocation: addressing the United Kingdom's colour-blind strategy.2019冠状病毒病疫苗分配：应对英国的色盲策略。
J R Soc Med. 2021 May;114(5):240-243. doi: 10.1177/01410768211001581. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
7
Rationing, Responsibility, and Vaccination during COVID-19: A Conceptual Map.新冠疫情期间的配给、责任与疫苗接种：概念图。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Jul;24(7):66-79. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2201188. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Rationing the flu vaccine.流感疫苗的配给
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005 Jul-Aug;11(4):373-4. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200507000-00019.
9
Fairly Incorporating Vaccination Status into Scarce Resource Allocation Frameworks.将疫苗接种状况合理纳入稀缺资源分配框架。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Jul;24(7):80-83. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2353827. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
10
Allocating Vaccines in a Pandemic: The Ethical Dimension.大流行期间的疫苗分配：伦理层面
Am J Med. 2020 Nov;133(11):1241-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Voluntariness or legal obligation? An ethical analysis of two instruments for fairer global access to COVID-19 vaccines.自愿还是法律义务？对实现更公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗的两种工具的伦理分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:995683. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.995683. eCollection 2023.
2
Vaccination associated with gross domestic product and fewer deaths in countries and regions: A verification study.接种疫苗与国内生产总值和国家及地区死亡人数减少相关：验证研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 28;101(4):e28619. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028619.
Zotero 插件