• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石术在既往手术肾脏中的应用。

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Previously Operated Kidney.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Kidney Centre Postgraduate Training Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Nov;30(11):1201-1205. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.11.1201.

DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2020.11.1201
PMID:33222741
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithomy in patients with previous open renal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

The Kidney Centre Postgraduate Training Institute, Karachi from January to December 2018.

METHODOLOGY

Patients with previous open renal surgery underwent percutaneous nephrolithomy during study period (Group A). Equal number of percutaneous nephrolithomy patients without previous open surgery taken as controls (Group B). Safety was defined in terms of 'blood loss' as change in hemoglobin (HB) level and 'blood transfusion,' while efficacy was defined in terms of 'stone clearance' and were compared between both the groups.

RESULTS

There were a total of 87 patients. Both groups had comparative gender ratio [p = 0.858]. Mean age [p = 0.132] and BMI [p = 0.879] of patients in both groups was not significantly different from each other. Both groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of values of stone size [p = 0.186], stone laterality [p = 0.437] stone location [p = 0.949], preoperative Hb [p = 0.095], postoperative Hb [p = 0.423] and change in Hb (indicating blood loss, p = 0.398). Puncture levels were significantly different among both groups (supracostal puncture in 18 and 36 patients; infracostal puncture in 63 and 51 patients in groups A and B, respectively, p = 0.006), while operative time [p = 0.787], calyx punctured [p = 0.051], double puncture [p = 0.787], nephrostomy tube [p = 0.288] were statistically not different among groups. Similar number of patients demonstrated residual stones [p = 0.773], along with residual stone sizes [Group A (0.5; 0.5) and Group B (0.65; 0.38)] [p = 0.445]. Intra- and postoperative complications like blood transfusion [p = 0.700] and fever [p = 1.000] along with hospital stay [p = 0.614] were comparable among groups.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous nephrolithomy is safe and effective in previously operated kidneys despite the possibility of calyceal anatomy distortion and scarring. Key Words: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Open surgery, Kidney calculi.

摘要

目的

确定经皮肾镜取石术治疗既往开放性肾脏手术患者的安全性和疗效。

研究设计

描述性研究。

地点和研究时间

卡拉奇肾脏中心研究生培训学院,2018 年 1 月至 12 月。

方法

研究期间,对既往接受过开放性肾脏手术的患者进行经皮肾镜取石术(A 组)。选择数量相等的无既往开放手术的经皮肾镜取石术患者作为对照组(B 组)。安全性定义为血红蛋白(HB)水平变化的“出血量”和“输血”,而疗效定义为“结石清除率”,并在两组之间进行比较。

结果

共有 87 名患者。两组的性别比例相当[P = 0.858]。两组患者的平均年龄[P = 0.132]和体重指数[P = 0.879]无显著差异。两组结石大小[P = 0.186]、结石侧位[P = 0.437]、结石位置[P = 0.949]、术前 HB [P = 0.095]、术后 HB [P = 0.423]和 HB 变化(表示失血,P = 0.398)无统计学差异。两组穿刺水平差异有统计学意义(A 组 18 例和 36 例为肋上穿刺;B 组 63 例和 51 例为肋下穿刺,P = 0.006),而手术时间[P = 0.787]、肾盏穿刺[P = 0.051]、双穿刺[P = 0.787]、肾造瘘管[P = 0.288]在组间无统计学差异。两组患者均有相似数量的残余结石[P = 0.773],残余结石大小[A 组(0.5;0.5)和 B 组(0.65;0.38)][P = 0.445]。术中及术后并发症如输血[P = 0.700]、发热[P = 1.000]和住院时间[P = 0.614]在组间相似。

结论

尽管可能存在肾盏解剖结构变形和瘢痕形成,但经皮肾镜取石术治疗既往手术肾脏是安全有效的。关键词:经皮肾镜取石术;开放性手术;肾结石。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Previously Operated Kidney.经皮肾镜碎石术在既往手术肾脏中的应用。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Nov;30(11):1201-1205. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.11.1201.
2
Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for managing renal calculi.经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中肾盂上盏与肾盂下盏入路处理肾结石的对比评价。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Feb;71(2(B)):602-607. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.461.
3
Does Access Location Influence Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Staghorn Stones?穿刺部位会影响鹿角形结石经皮肾镜取石术的结果吗?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Sep;31(9):1075-1080. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.09.1075.
4
Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Aug;28(8):623-627. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.08.623.
5
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗异常肾肾结石: 一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Previous Ipsilateral Open Renal Stone Surgery.经皮肾镜取石术治疗对侧开放肾结石术后同侧肾结石的疗效。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Sep 8;18(2):277-281. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i2.2285.
7
Thoracic Complications in Supracostal Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.肋上经皮肾镜取石术的胸部并发症
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2022 Nov 2;20(2):361-365. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v20i02.3950.
8
Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study.经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Jun;47(3):289-295. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1061-y. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Papillary vs non-papillary access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Retrospective, match-paired case-control study.经皮肾镜取石术中乳头状与非乳头状入路的比较:回顾性、匹配病例对照研究。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020 Apr 6;92(1):50-52. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2020.1.50.
10
Perioperative Indices Predicting Fever Following Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后发热的围手术期预测指标。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Dec;30(12):1306-1311. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.12.1306.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for kidney stones: a prospective cohort study.经皮肾镜取石术作为肾结石初次手术与二次手术的疗效及并发症:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Aug 30;86(10):5711-5715. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002502. eCollection 2024 Oct.