• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全口无牙颌患者中，“all-on-four”治疗理念与其他治疗方式的咬合力及咀嚼效率的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals.

作者信息

Soni Romesh, Yadav Himanshi, Pathak Abhishek, Bhatnagar Atul, Kumar Vikram

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Neurology, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jul-Sep;20(3):312-320. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_464_19
PMID:33223702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7654204/
Abstract

AIM

To compare and evaluate biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept, implant-supported overdenture, and conventional complete denture.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Invivo - comparative study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 12 edentulous patients were included in the study and conventional complete dentures were fabricated. Patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1, complete dentures were replaced with implant-supported overdenture, and in Group 2, complete dentures were replaced with hybrid denture supported by all-on-four treatment concept. The biting force was assessed using a bite force sensor and electromyographic recordings were made by electromyogram for masticatory muscles when chewing three different consistencies of foods.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The data was statistically analyzed using software SPSS version 22.0. Paired -test was used for intra-group comparison and unpaired t-test was used for intergroup comparison.

RESULTS

The difference in biting force and chewing efficiency for all-on-four treatment concept was statistically significant for overdenture and complete denture. The highest biting force and chewing efficiency were observed for all-on-four treatment concept, followed by implant-supported overdenture and complete denture.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that the completely edentulous individuals with atrophic posterior alveolar ridges can be rehabilitated successfully with improved biting force and chewing efficiency by All-on-four treatment concept.

摘要

目的

比较和评估“全口四颗种植体”修复理念、种植体支持的覆盖义齿以及传统全口义齿的咬合力和咀嚼效率。

设置与设计

体内比较研究。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入12名无牙颌患者，并制作了传统全口义齿。患者被分为两组。在第1组中，用种植体支持的覆盖义齿替换全口义齿，在第2组中，用“全口四颗种植体”修复理念支持的混合义齿替换全口义齿。使用咬力传感器评估咬合力，并在咀嚼三种不同质地食物时通过肌电图记录咀嚼肌的肌电活动。

所用统计分析方法

使用SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行统计分析。组内比较采用配对检验，组间比较采用非配对t检验。

结果

“全口四颗种植体”修复理念在咬合力和咀嚼效率方面与覆盖义齿和全口义齿相比差异具有统计学意义。“全口四颗种植体”修复理念的咬合力和咀嚼效率最高，其次是种植体支持的覆盖义齿和全口义齿。

结论

该研究得出结论，对于后牙牙槽嵴萎缩的无牙颌患者，采用“全口四颗种植体”修复理念可成功实现修复，提高咬合力和咀嚼效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/adf73e27ef7f/JIPS-20-312-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/043d30c857b6/JIPS-20-312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/c3b3412a376e/JIPS-20-312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/bd9f12cf2a0e/JIPS-20-312-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/2e311ed5fa18/JIPS-20-312-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/f1c5c8ad81f5/JIPS-20-312-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/adf73e27ef7f/JIPS-20-312-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/043d30c857b6/JIPS-20-312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/c3b3412a376e/JIPS-20-312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/bd9f12cf2a0e/JIPS-20-312-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/2e311ed5fa18/JIPS-20-312-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/f1c5c8ad81f5/JIPS-20-312-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38b9/7654204/adf73e27ef7f/JIPS-20-312-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals.全口无牙颌患者中，“all-on-four”治疗理念与其他治疗方式的咬合力及咀嚼效率的比较评估。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jul-Sep;20(3):312-320. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: An study.传统义齿与种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿之间咀嚼效率、咀嚼咬合力及患者满意度的比较评估：一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Oct-Dec;17(4):361-372. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_76_17.
3
Biting Force and Muscle Activity in Implant-Supported Single Mandibular Overdentures Opposing Fixed Maxillary Dentition.种植体支持的单颌下颌覆盖义齿与固定上颌牙列咬合时的咬合力和肌肉活动
Implant Dent. 2016 Apr;25(2):199-203. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000374.
4
Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.咀嚼功能与患者对种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的满意度：一项为期5年的前瞻性研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(6):575-81.
5
Electromyographic Evaluation of the Effect of Lined Dentures on Masticatory Muscle Activity in Edentulous Subjects.带衬里义齿对无牙颌患者咀嚼肌活动影响的肌电图评估
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC80-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13186.6359. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
6
In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.对上颌种植体支持固定义齿或覆盖义齿进行的体内力测量：一项初步研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Nov;84(5):535-47. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.110264.
7
The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency.下颌种植覆盖义齿对咀嚼效率的影响。
Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e650-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00539.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.与传统义齿相比，附着体固位的种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿的咀嚼效率：一项体外数字比色图像分析
Gen Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;68(6):60-64.
9
Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.下颌种植体支持覆盖义齿咬合力的变化：一项关于传统种植体与迷你种植体的初步研究比较。
Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency.下颌传统义齿和覆盖义齿对生活质量和咀嚼效率的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2016 Oct 10;30(1):e102. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0102.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation of Reference Bite Force Values: Investigating the Relationship Between Dental Prosthetic Restoration and Bite Force in a Cross-Sectional Study.参考咬合力值的评估：在一项横断面研究中调查牙修复体与咬合力之间的关系。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2723. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082723.
2
Validation of a New Measuring Instrument for the Assessment of Bite Force.一种用于评估咬合力的新型测量仪器的验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;13(23):3498. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233498.
3
Clinical and Technical Validation of Novel Bite Force Measuring Device for Functional Analysis after Mandibular Reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
A study on the evaluation of bite force, prosthetic and nutritional status in adult cleft patients in Kolkata.一项关于加尔各答成年腭裂患者咬合力、修复情况及营养状况评估的研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Oct-Dec;18(4):343-355. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_80_17.
2
A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: An study.传统义齿与种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿之间咀嚼效率、咀嚼咬合力及患者满意度的比较评估：一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Oct-Dec;17(4):361-372. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_76_17.
3
新型咬合力测量装置在下颌骨重建后功能分析中的临床与技术验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 5;13(4):586. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040586.
4
Electromyographic Analysis of Masticatory and Accessory Muscles in Subjects With Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses: A Three-Arm Comparative Clinical Study.种植体支持固定修复患者咀嚼肌和辅助肌的肌电图分析：一项三臂比较临床研究
Cureus. 2023 Jan 19;15(1):e33969. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33969. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Accuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative study.针对All-on-4治疗理念的14款口内扫描仪的准确性：一项对比研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Dec;14(6):388-398. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.388. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
A comparative study to evaluate surface electromyographic correlations of mandibular implant-supported overdentures to conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: An study.一项评估无牙颌患者下颌种植覆盖义齿与传统全口义齿表面肌电图相关性的对照研究：一项 研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):249-255. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_368_21.
7
The Reliability of a New Device for Measuring the Maximum Bite Force.一种新的测量最大咬合力的设备的可靠性。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 13;2022:3272958. doi: 10.1155/2022/3272958. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient-Centered Treatment Outcomes with Full-Arch PEEK Rehabilitation Supported on Four Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants. A Randomized Clinical Trial.在四颗即刻或传统负重种植体支持下的全牙弓聚醚醚酮修复体的以患者为中心的治疗结果。一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 5;10(19):4589. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194589.
9
Bite Force Transducers and Measurement Devices.咬合力传感器与测量装置
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Apr 9;9:665081. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.665081. eCollection 2021.
10
Biomechanical Behavior of All-on-4 and M-4 Configurations in an Atrophic Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Method.全口种植体 4 颗种植体即刻负重和 4 颗种植体延期负重在下颌骨萎缩患者中的生物力学行为：三维有限元法。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Mar 28;27:e929908. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929908.
Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials.
两种材料的种植体支持式固定全下颌弓修复体的三维有限元对比分析
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):255-260. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_11_17.
4
Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study.同一患者单颗、两颗和三颗种植体支持的覆盖义齿的咀嚼效率及患者满意度比较：一项初步研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):182-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.176522.
5
An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.一项体外比较研究，以评估用于种植体支持覆盖义齿的不同附着系统的固位情况。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):159-66. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.176520.
6
Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review.单颗种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿：文献综述。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):75-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164881.
7
Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review.咀嚼功能评估及其对口颌修复的影响：综述
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Oct;38(10):754-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02197.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
8
Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review.咬合力及其测量的影响因素：文献综述
Eur J Dent. 2010 Apr;4(2):223-32.
9
Objective and subjective hardness of a test item used for evaluating food mixing ability.用于评估食物混合能力的测试项目的客观和主观硬度。
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Mar;34(3):174-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01645.x.
10
Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.有颞下颌关节紊乱症体征和症状的青少年的肌肉厚度、咬合力及颅面尺寸。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Feb;29(1):72-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl055.