Department of Prosthodontics, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Mar 28;27:e929908. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929908.
BACKGROUND In edentulous patients, the concept of 4 implants with early loading has been widely used in clinical settings. In the case of bone atrophy in the anterior maxilla, using short implants or an angulated implant may be a good choice for treatment. The occlusal scheme remains a key aspect of All-on-4. The aim of this study was to use the 3-dimensional (3D) finite element method (FEM) to evaluate how different All-on-4 designs for canine-guided and group function occlusion affected the distribution of stress in the atrophic premaxilla. MATERIAL AND METHODS A 3D edentulous maxilla model was created and in 3D FEM, 3 different configurations - M4, All-on-4, and short implant - were modeled by changing the anterior implants and using 2 different occlusal schemes. For each model, the occlusal load was applied to simulate lateral movements. For cortical bone, the maximum and minimum principal stress values were generated, and for ductile materials, von Mises stress values were obtained. RESULTS No significant differences were detected among the models; generally, however, the highest stress values were observed in the M-4 model and the models with short implants. Slightly higher stress values were observed in the group function occlusion group than in the canine-guided occlusion group. CONCLUSIONS To promote better primary stabilization, M-4 or short implant configurations with canine-guided occlusion appear to be preferable for patients who have severe atrophy in the anterior maxilla.
在无牙颌患者中,4 个种植体早期负重的概念已广泛应用于临床实践中。在前上颌骨萎缩的情况下,使用短种植体或倾斜种植体可能是一种治疗的好选择。咬合方案仍然是 All-on-4 的关键方面。本研究旨在使用三维(3D)有限元方法(FEM)来评估犬引导和组功能咬合的不同 All-on-4 设计如何影响萎缩前上颌骨的应力分布。
创建了一个 3D 无牙上颌骨模型,并在 3D FEM 中,通过改变前植入物并使用 2 种不同的咬合方案,对 3 种不同的配置(M4、All-on-4 和短植入物)进行建模。对于每个模型,施加咬合负荷以模拟侧向运动。对于皮质骨,生成最大和最小主应力值,对于韧性材料,获得 von Mises 应力值。
模型之间没有发现显著差异;然而,通常情况下,M-4 模型和短种植体模型的最高应力值最大。组功能咬合组的应力值略高于犬引导咬合组。
为了促进更好的初始稳定性,对于上颌骨前区严重萎缩的患者,M-4 或具有犬引导咬合的短种植体配置似乎更可取。