• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全口种植体 4 颗种植体即刻负重和 4 颗种植体延期负重在下颌骨萎缩患者中的生物力学行为:三维有限元法。

Biomechanical Behavior of All-on-4 and M-4 Configurations in an Atrophic Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Method.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2021 Mar 28;27:e929908. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929908.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.929908
PMID:33774647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8015646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND In edentulous patients, the concept of 4 implants with early loading has been widely used in clinical settings. In the case of bone atrophy in the anterior maxilla, using short implants or an angulated implant may be a good choice for treatment. The occlusal scheme remains a key aspect of All-on-4. The aim of this study was to use the 3-dimensional (3D) finite element method (FEM) to evaluate how different All-on-4 designs for canine-guided and group function occlusion affected the distribution of stress in the atrophic premaxilla. MATERIAL AND METHODS A 3D edentulous maxilla model was created and in 3D FEM, 3 different configurations - M4, All-on-4, and short implant - were modeled by changing the anterior implants and using 2 different occlusal schemes. For each model, the occlusal load was applied to simulate lateral movements. For cortical bone, the maximum and minimum principal stress values were generated, and for ductile materials, von Mises stress values were obtained. RESULTS No significant differences were detected among the models; generally, however, the highest stress values were observed in the M-4 model and the models with short implants. Slightly higher stress values were observed in the group function occlusion group than in the canine-guided occlusion group. CONCLUSIONS To promote better primary stabilization, M-4 or short implant configurations with canine-guided occlusion appear to be preferable for patients who have severe atrophy in the anterior maxilla.

摘要

背景

在无牙颌患者中,4 个种植体早期负重的概念已广泛应用于临床实践中。在前上颌骨萎缩的情况下,使用短种植体或倾斜种植体可能是一种治疗的好选择。咬合方案仍然是 All-on-4 的关键方面。本研究旨在使用三维(3D)有限元方法(FEM)来评估犬引导和组功能咬合的不同 All-on-4 设计如何影响萎缩前上颌骨的应力分布。

材料和方法

创建了一个 3D 无牙上颌骨模型,并在 3D FEM 中,通过改变前植入物并使用 2 种不同的咬合方案,对 3 种不同的配置(M4、All-on-4 和短植入物)进行建模。对于每个模型,施加咬合负荷以模拟侧向运动。对于皮质骨,生成最大和最小主应力值,对于韧性材料,获得 von Mises 应力值。

结果

模型之间没有发现显著差异;然而,通常情况下,M-4 模型和短种植体模型的最高应力值最大。组功能咬合组的应力值略高于犬引导咬合组。

结论

为了促进更好的初始稳定性,对于上颌骨前区严重萎缩的患者,M-4 或具有犬引导咬合的短种植体配置似乎更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/c2ea108ed22b/medscimonit-27-e929908-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/4a39c704f738/medscimonit-27-e929908-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/ab2af4bf4136/medscimonit-27-e929908-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/e2c5c42089c2/medscimonit-27-e929908-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/529cc0d001ae/medscimonit-27-e929908-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/e795d9002785/medscimonit-27-e929908-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/dff874800d61/medscimonit-27-e929908-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/f63aaa331026/medscimonit-27-e929908-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/a524e64e5b3d/medscimonit-27-e929908-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/c2ea108ed22b/medscimonit-27-e929908-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/4a39c704f738/medscimonit-27-e929908-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/ab2af4bf4136/medscimonit-27-e929908-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/e2c5c42089c2/medscimonit-27-e929908-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/529cc0d001ae/medscimonit-27-e929908-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/e795d9002785/medscimonit-27-e929908-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/dff874800d61/medscimonit-27-e929908-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/f63aaa331026/medscimonit-27-e929908-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/a524e64e5b3d/medscimonit-27-e929908-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a1/8015646/c2ea108ed22b/medscimonit-27-e929908-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Behavior of All-on-4 and M-4 Configurations in an Atrophic Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Method.全口种植体 4 颗种植体即刻负重和 4 颗种植体延期负重在下颌骨萎缩患者中的生物力学行为:三维有限元法。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Mar 28;27:e929908. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929908.
2
Biomechanical comparison of the All-on-4, M-4, and V-4 techniques in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D finite element analysis.萎缩性上颌骨中All-on-4、M-4和V-4技术的生物力学比较:三维有限元分析
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Aug;123:103880. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103880. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
3
Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes.采用“All-on-Four”概念的不同咬合方案对种植体及支持组织的应用力进行有限元应力分析。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):185-194. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13004. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
4
Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.全口四颗种植体和全口六颗种植体治疗理念及基托材料对萎缩上颌骨应力分布的比较:一项基于原型制作的三维有限元分析研究
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Dec 1;69:715-25. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.059. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Comparison of Biomechanical Behaviors of Different Designs and Configurations of Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants With Finite Elements Analysis in Anterior Maxilla.在前上颌骨中采用有限元分析比较不同设计和配置的钛和氧化锆牙科种植体的生物力学行为。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Jun 1;50(3):277-287. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00011.
6
Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.在牙槽骨萎缩的无牙上颌中,标准牙种植体、颧骨种植体和骨膜下种植体的应力分布比较:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):347-356. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9987.
7
Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.不同骨-种植体接触率对上颌后牙区牙槽骨模型短种植体应力分布的影响:有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2016 Feb;42(1):26-33. doi: 10.1563/aaid-doi-D-14-00003.
8
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
9
Biomechanical behavior of all-on-4 concept and alternative designs under different occlusal load configurations for completely edentulous mandible: a 3-D finite element analysis.全口种植体“All-on-4”概念及其在不同咬合负荷配置下的替代设计在下颌完全无牙颌中的生物力学行为:三维有限元分析。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1231-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00941-1. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study.不同倾斜种植体角度和骨类型的种植体支持式修复体在萎缩上颌骨中的生物力学评估:有限元研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Jul 1;86:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element analysis on implant-supported bar with different geometric shapes.不同几何形状的种植体支持杆的有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1572. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05373-5.
2
Biomechanical behavior of all-on-4 concept and alternative designs under different occlusal load configurations for completely edentulous mandible: a 3-D finite element analysis.全口种植体“All-on-4”概念及其在不同咬合负荷配置下的替代设计在下颌完全无牙颌中的生物力学行为:三维有限元分析。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1231-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00941-1. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals.全口无牙颌患者中,“all-on-four”治疗理念与其他治疗方式的咬合力及咀嚼效率的比较评估。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jul-Sep;20(3):312-320. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
Biomechanical comparison of the All-on-4, M-4, and V-4 techniques in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D finite element analysis.萎缩性上颌骨中All-on-4、M-4和V-4技术的生物力学比较:三维有限元分析
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Aug;123:103880. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103880. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
3
无牙下颌骨中的种植体支持式修复体:通过有限元分析对不同种植体构型进行生物力学分析
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;11(1):4. doi: 10.3390/dj11010004.
4
Stresses induced by one piece and two piece dental implants in All-on-4® implant supported prosthesis under simulated lateral occlusal loading: non linear finite element analysis study.在侧向咬合加载下,模拟全口义齿种植体支持式修复体中,单颗和双颗牙种植体所承受的应力:非线性有限元分析研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 22;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02228-9.
5
Evaluation of Stresses on Implant, Bone, and Restorative Materials Caused by Different Opposing Arch Materials in Hybrid Prosthetic Restorations Using the All-on-4 Technique.使用All-on-4技术的混合修复体中,不同对颌弓材料对种植体、骨组织和修复材料所产生应力的评估。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 1;14(15):4308. doi: 10.3390/ma14154308.
Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis.
下颌骨全口四颗种植体设计对种植体及周围骨组织的影响:三维有限元分析
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):456-463. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_471_19.
4
Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study.种植固定全口义齿的存活率和修复体并发症:一项长达 5 年的回顾性研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov;124(5):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.022. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
Effect of Smoking and Locations of Dental Implants on Peri-Implant Parameters: 3-Year Follow-Up.吸烟和种植体位置对种植体周围参数的影响:3 年随访。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Aug 15;25:6104-6109. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916613.
6
Vickers Micro-Hardness of New Restorative CAD/CAM Dental Materials: Evaluation and Comparison after Exposure to Acidic Drink.新型口腔修复CAD/CAM牙科材料的维氏显微硬度:接触酸性饮料后的评估与比较
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;12(8):1246. doi: 10.3390/ma12081246.
7
The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: A longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up.全口义齿上颌骨无牙颌的 All-on-4 概念:5-13 年随访的纵向研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):538-549. doi: 10.1111/cid.12771. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes.采用“All-on-Four”概念的不同咬合方案对种植体及支持组织的应用力进行有限元应力分析。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):185-194. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13004. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Effect of Load Cycling on the Fracture Strength/Mode of Teeth Restored with FRC Posts or a FRC Liner and a Resin Composite.载频循环对 FRC 桩或 FRC 嵌体和树脂复合材料修复牙的断裂强度/模式的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 14;2018:9054301. doi: 10.1155/2018/9054301. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials.两种材料的种植体支持式固定全下颌弓修复体的三维有限元对比分析
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):255-260. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_11_17.