Rosenberg Joshua M, Staudt Willet K Bret
University of Tennessee, 420 Claxton Complex, 1122 Volunteer Blvd, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2021;69(1):347-351. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09860-8. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Privacy and confidentiality are core considerations in education, while at the same time, using and sharing data-and, more broadly, open science-is increasingly valued by editors, funding agencies, and the public. This manuscript responds to an empirical investigation of students' perceptions of the use of their data in learning analytics systems by Ifentahler and Schumacher (Educational Technology Research and Development, 64: 923-938, 2016). We summarize their work in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shift to digital modes of teaching and learning by many teachers, using the tension between privacy and open science to frame our response. We offer informed recommendations for educational technology researchers in light of Ifentahler and Schumacher's findings as well as strategies for navigating the tension between these important values. We conclude with a call for educational technology scholars to meet the challenge of studying learning (and disruptions to learning) in light of COVID-19 while protecting the privacy of students in ways that go beyond what Institutional Review Boards consider to be within their purview.
隐私和保密是教育中的核心考量因素,与此同时,数据的使用与共享——更广泛地说,开放科学——越来越受到编辑、资助机构和公众的重视。本手稿回应了伊芬塔勒和舒马赫对学生在学习分析系统中对其数据使用情况的看法所做的实证研究(《教育技术研究与发展》,64卷:923 - 938页,2016年)。我们在新冠疫情背景以及许多教师由此转向数字化教学和学习模式的情况下,总结他们的研究工作,利用隐私与开放科学之间的矛盾来构建我们的回应。鉴于伊芬塔勒和舒马赫的研究结果,我们为教育技术研究人员提供了明智的建议,以及应对这些重要价值观之间矛盾的策略。我们呼吁教育技术学者在新冠疫情背景下应对研究学习(以及学习中断情况)的挑战,同时以超越机构审查委员会职权范围的方式保护学生隐私。