Evaluating the feasibility of a novel Marking Breast Oncoplastic Surgery Simulator (MBOSS) as a training tool for marking: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND

Currently, volunteers and/or anatomical models are used for teaching oncoplastic surgery marking. However, as the breast is an intimate organ, recruiting volunteers is difficult, and the available droopy breast models have limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel Marking Breast Oncoplastic Surgery Simulator (MBOSS) for the teaching of marking.

METHODS

Breast/plastic surgeons/trainees, grouped according to their oncoplastic experience, were randomized to MBOSS or volunteer. All had a pre-test evaluation prior to receiving hands-on training in inverted T mammoplasty marking in their randomized group, followed by an assessment of their marking skills, by an examiner blinded to their group assignment. All participants then underwent post-test and course evaluations, and those who used MBOSS for training, also evaluated MBOSS realism. Learning outcomes between the two groups were compared using the Kirkpatrick educational model.

RESULTS

Forty participants were enrolled. Demographics, baseline oncoplastic experience and pre-test results were comparable between the MBOSS and volunteer groups. For Kirkpatrick level 1 satisfaction outcomes, the two groups did not differ significantly. For level 2 knowledge assessment, MBOSS post-test scores were significantly higher (P=0.0471). For level 3 skill application and level 4 organizational impact evaluated 6 months post course, there were no significant differences between the groups. Although MBOSS may not mimic the breast completely, 95% of MBOSS-trained participants rated MBOSS as a good training tool and 85% would use MBOSS instead of a volunteer.

CONCLUSIONS

MBOSS learning outcomes are comparable to outcomes using volunteers, making MBOSS an alternative for teaching oncoplastic surgery marking.