Cozzo Alyssa J, Coleman Michael F, Pearce Jane B, Pfeil Alexander J, Etigunta Suhas K, Hursting Stephen D
Department of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Nov 5;8:590192. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.590192. eCollection 2020.
Cancer cells experience unique and dynamic shifts in their metabolic function in order to survive, proliferate, and evade growth inhibition in the resource-scarce tumor microenvironment. Therefore, identification of pharmacological agents with potential to reprogram cancer cell metabolism may improve clinical outcomes in cancer therapy. Cancer cells also often exhibit an increased dependence on the process known as autophagy, both for baseline survival and as a response to stressors such as chemotherapy or a decline in nutrient availability. There is evidence to suggest that this increased dependence on autophagy in cancer cells may be exploitable clinically by combining autophagy modulators with existing chemotherapies. In light of the increased metabolic rate in cancer cells, interest is growing in approaches aimed at "starving" cancer through dietary and pharmacologic interventions that reduce availability of nutrients and pro-growth hormonal signals known to promote cancer progression. Several dietary approaches, including chronic calorie restriction and multiple forms of fasting, have been investigated for their potential anti-cancer benefits, yielding promising results in animal models. Induction of autophagy in response to dietary energy restriction may underlie some of the observed benefit. However, while interventions based on dietary energy restriction have demonstrated safety in clinical trials, uncertainty remains regarding translation to humans as well as feasibility of achieving compliance due to the potential discomfort and weight loss that accompanies dietary restriction. Further induction of autophagy through dietary or pharmacologic metabolic reprogramming interventions may enhance the efficacy of autophagy inhibition in the context of adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether therapeutic agents aimed at autophagy induction, autophagy inhibition, or both are a viable therapeutic strategy for improving cancer outcomes. This review discusses the literature available for the therapeutic potential of these approaches.
癌细胞在其代谢功能上经历独特而动态的转变,以便在资源稀缺的肿瘤微环境中存活、增殖并逃避生长抑制。因此,鉴定具有重编程癌细胞代谢潜力的药物制剂可能会改善癌症治疗的临床结果。癌细胞通常还表现出对自噬过程的依赖性增加,这既是为了维持基线生存,也是作为对化疗或营养物质可用性下降等应激源的一种反应。有证据表明,癌细胞对自噬的这种增加的依赖性在临床上可能通过将自噬调节剂与现有化疗药物联合使用来加以利用。鉴于癌细胞代谢率的提高,人们对通过饮食和药物干预来 “饿死” 癌细胞的方法越来越感兴趣,这些干预措施可减少已知会促进癌症进展的营养物质和促生长激素信号的可用性。包括长期热量限制和多种形式的禁食在内的几种饮食方法已被研究其潜在抗癌益处,在动物模型中取得了有前景的结果。饮食能量限制引起的自噬诱导可能是一些观察到的益处的基础。然而,虽然基于饮食能量限制的干预措施在临床试验中已证明具有安全性,但在转化应用于人类以及由于饮食限制伴随的潜在不适和体重减轻而实现依从性的可行性方面仍存在不确定性。通过饮食或药物代谢重编程干预进一步诱导自噬可能会增强辅助或新辅助化疗背景下自噬抑制的疗效。尽管如此,旨在诱导自噬、抑制自噬或两者兼有的治疗药物是否是改善癌症治疗结果的可行治疗策略仍不清楚。本综述讨论了这些方法治疗潜力的现有文献。