• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髁突位移的比较:下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后取决于关节窝深度。

Comparison of condylar displacement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy depending on the glenoid fossa depth.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;49(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.001
PMID:33229066
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between postoperative condylar displacement (PCD) after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and the glenoid fossa depth. A total of 29 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) before surgery (T0), immediately after (T1), and 6 months after (T2) surgery were studied. The fossa depth was measured, and the amount of displaced condylar center and axis were evaluated on CT at T0, T1, and T2 using three-dimensional analysis software. PCD and the fossa depth relationship was investigated by Pearson's correlation analysis. The fossa depth varied from 3.9 mm to 12.0 mm, and the mean value was 8.15 ± 1.60 mm. The condylar center was displaced by 1.12 ± 0.66 mm at T1 compared with it at T0. The amount of displaced condylar center negatively correlated with the fossa depth (r = -0.424, p = 0.001). The displacement of the condylar center between T0 and T2 was 0.85 ± 0.51 mm. The amount of condylar center displacement between T0 and T1 showed a positive correlation with it between T0 and T2 (r = 0.481, p < 0.001). In conclusion, more attention is needed in patients with small fossa depth during condylar repositioning after SSRO and postoperative management to minimize complications.

摘要

本研究旨在评估髁突后移位(PCD)与关节窝深度之间的关系。共研究了 29 例接受 CT 扫描的患者,分别在术前(T0)、术后即刻(T1)和术后 6 个月(T2)进行。使用三维分析软件测量关节窝深度,并在 T0、T1 和 T2 时对 CT 上的移位髁突中心和轴进行评估。通过 Pearson 相关分析研究 PCD 和关节窝深度之间的关系。关节窝深度从 3.9mm 到 12.0mm 不等,平均值为 8.15±1.60mm。与 T0 相比,T1 时髁突中心移位 1.12±0.66mm。髁突中心的移位量与关节窝深度呈负相关(r=-0.424,p=0.001)。T0 至 T2 之间髁突中心的移位量为 0.85±0.51mm。T0 至 T1 之间髁突中心的移位量与 T0 至 T2 之间的移位量呈正相关(r=0.481,p<0.001)。总之,在 SSRO 后髁突重新定位和术后管理中,对于关节窝深度较小的患者需要更加注意,以最小化并发症的发生。

相似文献

1
Comparison of condylar displacement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy depending on the glenoid fossa depth.髁突位移的比较:下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后取决于关节窝深度。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;49(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.不对称后缩患者下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后髁突移位的锥形束 CT 评估:传统入路与先手术入路的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):733-738. doi: 10.2319/122316-925.1. Epub 2017 May 22.
3
Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌前徙联合Le Fort I截骨术的双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后髁突位置的短期和长期变化。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1956-66. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.213. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
Condylar surface CT value in sagittal plane before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术前、后矢状面髁突表面CT值。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;21(2):159-169. doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0612-7. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
5
Evaluation of treatment with unilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy and maxillary osteotomy in patients with condylar osteochondroma and mandibular asymmetry: A retrospective case series.髁突骨软骨瘤伴下颌不对称患者行单侧下颌矢状劈开升支截骨术和上颌截骨术治疗的评估:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;51(2):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
6
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Condylar Displacement and Adaptive Remodeling in Asymmetrical Mandibular Prognathism Patients After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.不对称下颌前突患者接受下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后髁突位移和适应性改建的三维定量评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(1):240-246. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008836. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept.下颌后缩和前突患者双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后髁突位置的变化:一种新的髁突-关节窝匹配概念。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Dec;57(10):1086-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.09.022. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.对比下颌前突患者行单侧和双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后髁突形态变化和位置稳定性。
Head Face Med. 2019 Jul 11;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0202-z.
9
Does adjunctive fixation in conjunction with miniplate affect condylar position and morphology after mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy? A retrospective 3-dimensional CT comparative study.双侧矢状劈开下颌骨截骨术辅助固定联合微型钢板固定对下颌前伸后髁突位置和形态的影响:一项回顾性三维 CT 对比研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;52(6):778-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.03.036. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
10
Three-dimensional analysis of postoperative returning movement of perioperative condylar displacement after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback with different fixation methods.不同固定方法下颌后缩双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后髁突移位术后复位运动的三维分析
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;43(9):1918-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
[Clinical analysis of changes in the position of the condyle and temporomandibular joint after repair of mandibular defects].[下颌骨缺损修复后髁突位置及颞下颌关节变化的临床分析]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 1;43(3):422-430. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2025.2024337.
2
Development of animal model for anterior open bite and mechanism of temporomandibular joint morphological change: an implication for MAC surgery.前牙开颌动物模型的建立及颞下颌关节形态变化机制:对下颌升支矢状劈开术的启示
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05612-3.
3
Experts' consensus on precaution and treatment for complications of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术并发症预防与治疗专家共识
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 May 25;40(3):247-254. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2022.03.001.