• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波前优化近视激光原位角膜磨镶术后对比敏感度变化与消融深度关系的研究

Study of change in contrast sensitivity in relation to depth of ablation after wavefront optimized myopic laser-assisted keratomileusis.

作者信息

Heralgi Mallikarjun M, Kavitha V, Dwivedi Manisha, Preethi V, Roopasree B V, Rajashekar J, Deokar Ankit

机构信息

Cornea and Refractive Surgery Department, Sankara Eye Hospital, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.

Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2975-2980. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1399_20.

DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1399_20
PMID:33229680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7856953/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to study the change in contrast sensitivity (CS) in relation to depth of stromal ablation after wavefront-optimized (WFO) myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

This was as prospective, longitudinal, comparative study. The study participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 ≤50 μ ablation depth; 60 eyes and group 2 >50 μ ablation depth; 60 eyes. All underwent WFO LASIK. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA) and CS were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 2 and 6 months. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), Unpaired t test and one-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to test differences across time periods within each treatment group. A value of P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean ablation depths in groups 1 and 2 were 39.30 μ ± 7.22 μ and 69.90 μ ± 12.09 μ, respectively; the maximum depth was 94.62 μ. In group 1, the preoperative mean CS was 1.91 ± 0.07, which improved postoperatively at 1 week (1.93 ± 0.06) and remained stable in subsequent follow-ups (1.94 ± 0.05). In group 2, the mean CS preoperatively was 1.87 ± 0.12, which postoperatively at 1 week and 6 months were 1.93 ± 0.07 and 1.94 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). Between the groups, preoperative CS was significantly different (P = 0.04), but the change in CS post-LASIK was insignificant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant improvement in CS after WFO myopic LASIK in all patients irrespective of ablation depth (up to 94.62 μ).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨波前优化(WFO)的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后,对比敏感度(CS)随基质消融深度的变化情况。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、纵向、对比研究。研究对象分为两组:第1组消融深度≤50μm,共60眼;第2组消融深度>50μm,共60眼。所有患者均接受WFO LASIK手术。术前及术后1周、2周、2个月和6个月测量未矫正及矫正远视力(UDVA和CDVA)和CS。采用双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)、非配对t检验和单向重复测量ANOVA检验各治疗组不同时间段的差异。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

第1组和第2组的平均消融深度分别为39.30μm±7.22μm和69.90μm±12.09μm;最大深度为94.62μm。第1组术前平均CS为1.91±0.07,术后1周改善(1.93±0.06),随后随访中保持稳定(1.94±0.05)。第2组术前平均CS为1.87±0.12,术后1周和6个月分别为1.93±0.07和1.94±0.03(P<0.05)。两组间术前CS有显著差异(P=0.04),但LASIK术后CS的变化无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

无论消融深度如何(最深达94.62μm),所有患者在接受WFO近视LASIK术后CS均有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b59/7856953/f02d602707b0/IJO-68-2975-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b59/7856953/c2958d04c7e0/IJO-68-2975-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b59/7856953/f02d602707b0/IJO-68-2975-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b59/7856953/c2958d04c7e0/IJO-68-2975-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b59/7856953/f02d602707b0/IJO-68-2975-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Study of change in contrast sensitivity in relation to depth of ablation after wavefront optimized myopic laser-assisted keratomileusis.波前优化近视激光原位角膜磨镶术后对比敏感度变化与消融深度关系的研究
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2975-2980. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1399_20.
2
Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.前瞻性、随机、对照眼研究:波前引导与波前优化 LASIK 手术的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;207:175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
3
A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. topography-guided 与 wavefront-optimized FS-LASIK 矫正近视与近视散光的随机对照研究。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):575-582. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190819-01.
4
[Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].标准与波前引导的近视飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后视力与高阶像差的比较
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2015 Jan;71(1):44-50.
5
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes and ocular aberrations following wavefront optimized and topography-guided customized femtosecond laser keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: A contralateral eye study.波前像差优化和地形图引导的个体化飞秒激光角膜磨镶术治疗近视和近视散光的对比分析:一项对侧眼研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;66(11):1558-1561. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_507_18.
6
Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK.LASIK中波前优化消融术与采用LYRA方案的角膜地形图引导Contoura消融术的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):222-229. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190304-02.
7
Comparison of visual outcomes after variable spot scanning ablation versus wavefront-optimized myopic LASIK.可变光斑扫描消融术与波前优化近视准分子原位角膜磨镶术术后视觉效果的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;31(1):22-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20141218-03.
8
Visual acuity and higher-order aberrations with wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis.波前引导和波前优化 LASIK 术中的视力和高阶像差。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar;36(3):437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.031.
9
Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.使用波前引导的 IntraLase 飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗中高度散光后诱发的高阶像差
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 22;16:29. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0205-5.
10
Wavefront-optimized excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: refractive outcomes and corneal densitometry.波前像差引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视和近视散光:屈光结果和角膜密度测定。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.041. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK.LASIK中波前优化消融术与采用LYRA方案的角膜地形图引导Contoura消融术的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):222-229. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190304-02.
2
Comparison of visual outcomes after variable spot scanning ablation versus wavefront-optimized myopic LASIK.可变光斑扫描消融术与波前优化近视准分子原位角膜磨镶术术后视觉效果的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;31(1):22-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20141218-03.
3
Factors influencing contrast sensitivity function in myopic eyes.
影响近视眼对比敏感度函数的因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e113562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113562. eCollection 2014.
4
Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.波前引导与波前优化的 LASIK 治疗近视:前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;157(6):1170-1178.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.037. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
5
Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism.用于原发性近视和近视散光的Q值定制消融术(定制Q)与波前优化消融术的比较
Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;34(2):259-62. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9828-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave ® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations.在准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)中,对威视(WaveLight®) Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q与VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™进行前瞻性、随机、对侧眼比较:视觉结果和高阶像差分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1339-47. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S24316. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
7
Ocular aberrations after wavefront optimized LASIK for myopia.波前像差引导的个体化切削治疗近视术后的像差变化。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):307-12. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.64139.
8
Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial.使用鹰视波前像差引导系统的波前优化与波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视散光:一项美国食品药品监督管理局前瞻性试验的三个月结果
J Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;24(4):S424-30. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080401-20.
9
Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.波前引导与波前优化准分子原位角膜磨镶术:对侧对比研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):389-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.028.
10
Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile.使用尼德克EC-5000优化非球面过渡区(OATz)的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与传统消融模式的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;22(6):546-55. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060601-06.