• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型碘普罗胺基紫杉醇涂层球囊 Shenqi 与 SeQuent Please 治疗支架内再狭窄的随机比较。

A randomized comparison of a novel iopromide-based paclitaxel-coated balloon Shenqi versus SeQuent Please for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):526-533. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000994.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000000994
PMID:33229940
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains challenging in contemporary clinical applications. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty offers an effective treatment for ISR. Shenqi is a novel iopromide-based paclitaxel-coated balloon and its clinical safety, effectiveness and angiographic efficacy in patients with ISR have not been investigated.

METHODS

A total of 216 subjects with the first occurrence of ISR at 11 investigational sites in China were randomly allocated in a 1:1 fashion to treatment with DCB SeQuent Please or Shenqi. Clinical follow-up was planned at 1, 6, 9 and 12 months, and angiographic follow-up was planned at 9 months. The study was powered for the primary endpoint of 9-month in-segment late loss.

RESULTS

At 9-month follow-up, the in-segment late loss was 0.29 ± 0.43 mm with Shenqi versus 0.30 ± 0.46 mm with SeQuent Please, and the one-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.14 mm, achieving noninferiority of Shenqi compared with SeQuent Please (P = 0.002). In total, 12 patients developed target lesion failure (TLF) in the Shenqi group compared with 16 patients in the SeQuent Please group (10.91% versus 15.09%; P = 0.42) within 1 year. TLF was mainly driven by target lesion revascularization (9.09%) followed by target vessel-related myocardial infarction (1.82%) and cardiovascular death (0.91%) in the Shenqi group.

CONCLUSIONS

Shenqi DCB was noninferior to SeQuent Please DCB for the primary endpoint of 9-month in-segment late loss. Shenqi DCB may become an attractive alternative treatment for patients with coronary ISR, withholding the need for additional stent implantation.

摘要

背景

在当代临床应用中,治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)仍然具有挑战性。药物涂层球囊(DCB)血管成形术为 ISR 提供了一种有效的治疗方法。深奇是一种新型的碘普罗胺基紫杉醇涂层球囊,其在 ISR 患者中的临床安全性、有效性和血管造影疗效尚未得到研究。

方法

在中国的 11 个研究地点,共有 216 名首次发生 ISR 的患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至 DCB SeQuent Please 或深奇治疗组。临床随访计划在 1、6、9 和 12 个月进行,血管造影随访计划在 9 个月进行。该研究的主要终点为 9 个月时的节段内晚期管腔丢失。

结果

在 9 个月的随访中,深奇组的节段内晚期管腔丢失为 0.29±0.43mm,而 SeQuent Please 组为 0.30±0.46mm,差异的单侧 97.5%置信上限为 0.14mm,深奇与 SeQuent Please 相比达到了非劣效性(P=0.002)。共有 12 名患者在深奇组发生了目标病变失败(TLF),而在 SeQuent Please 组为 16 名(10.91%比 15.09%;P=0.42),在 1 年内。深奇组的 TLF 主要由靶病变血运重建(9.09%)驱动,其次是靶血管相关心肌梗死(1.82%)和心血管死亡(0.91%)。

结论

深奇 DCB 在 9 个月时的节段内晚期管腔丢失主要终点方面不劣于 SeQuent Please DCB。深奇 DCB 可能成为冠状动脉 ISR 患者的一种有吸引力的治疗选择,可以避免再次植入支架。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparison of a novel iopromide-based paclitaxel-coated balloon Shenqi versus SeQuent Please for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.一种新型碘普罗胺基紫杉醇涂层球囊 Shenqi 与 SeQuent Please 治疗支架内再狭窄的随机比较。
Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):526-533. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000994.
2
Comparison of 2 Different Drug-Coated Balloons in In-Stent Restenosis: The RESTORE ISR China Randomized Trial.比较两种不同药物涂层球囊在支架内再狭窄中的疗效:RESTORE ISR China 随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 10;11(23):2368-2377. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.010.
3
A randomized comparison of two paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: The LONGTY ISR China randomized trial (LONGTY DCB vs. SeQuent Please DCB).两种紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的随机比较:中国 LONGTY ISR 随机试验(LONGTY DCB 与 SeQuent Please DCB)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97 Suppl 2:988-995. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29589. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
A Randomized Comparison of 2 Different Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis.两种不同药物涂层球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的随机比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):759-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.12.018.
5
A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical study of drug-coated balloons for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.多中心、随机对照临床试验:药物涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 17;16(4):e328-e334. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00051.
6
A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的前瞻性、多中心、随机试验:来自 PEPCAD China ISR 试验的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.011.
7
A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Any In-Stent Restenosis: The DARE Trial.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗任何部位支架内再狭窄的随机比较:DARE 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon.药物涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 25;12(6):558-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.040.
9
Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.两种不同紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的比较:一项随机对照试验
JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 1;2(2):170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.015. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty: Insights From the PEPCAD-DES Study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter).紫杉醇涂层球囊与球囊血管成形术治疗的长期结果:PEPCAD-DES 研究的见解(使用 SeQuent Please 紫杉醇涂层经皮腔内冠状动脉血管成形术 [PTCA] 导管治疗药物洗脱支架 [DES] 支架内再狭窄)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄治疗的最新进展
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 6;25(12):433. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512433. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Drug-coated balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stenting for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions: REC-CAGEFREE I trial rationale and design.药物涂层球囊血管成形术联合临时支架与直接支架置入治疗新发冠状动脉病变:REC-CAGEFREE I 试验的原理和设计。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03974-0.
3
Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of drug-coated balloon (2 Edition).
药物涂层球囊临床应用中国专家共识(第2版)
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Feb 28;21(2):135-152. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.02.001.
4
Comparative efficacy of interventional therapies and devices for coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄介入治疗及器械的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 8;10(6):e27521. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27521. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
5
Prognostic value of post-procedural μQFR for drug-coated balloons in the treatment of in-stent restenosis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后 μQFR 对药物涂层球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的预测价值。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(2):167-177. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0154. Epub 2021 Nov 23.