Suppr超能文献

采用德尔菲咨询法确定用于实验室饲养猕猴的有效福利指标。

The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process.

机构信息

Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.

Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77437-9.

Abstract

Despite the importance for both animal welfare and scientific integrity of effective welfare assessment in non-human primates, there has been little or no consensus as what should be assessed. A Delphi consultation process was undertaken to identify the animal- and environment-based measures of welfare for laboratory-housed macaques and to determine their relative importance in on-site welfare assessments. One-hundred fifteen potential indictors were identified through a comprehensive literature search, followed by a two-round iterative electronic survey process to collect expert opinion. Stable group response and consensus about the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the proposed indicators (67.5% agreement) was achieved by the completion of Round Two. A substantially higher proportion of environment-based measures (72%: n = 44/61) were considered as valid, reliable, and feasible compared to the animal-based measures (22%: n = 12/54). The indicators that ranked most highly for assessing welfare were the presence of self-harm behaviours and the provision of social enrichment. This study provides an empirical basis upon which these indicators can be validated and then integrated into assessment tools developed for macaques and emphasises the need to include both animal- and environment-based indicators for accurate welfare monitoring.

摘要

尽管对非人类灵长类动物进行有效的福利评估对动物福利和科学完整性都很重要,但对于应该评估什么,尚未达成共识或几乎没有共识。采用德尔菲咨询程序来确定用于实验室饲养的猕猴的基于动物和环境的福利措施,并确定它们在现场福利评估中的相对重要性。通过全面的文献检索确定了 115 种潜在的指标,然后通过两轮迭代电子调查过程收集专家意见。通过第二轮的完成,实现了稳定的小组响应和对提出的指标的有效性、可靠性和可行性的共识(67.5%的一致性)。与基于动物的措施(22%:n=12/54)相比,基于环境的措施(72%:n=44/61)被认为更有效、可靠和可行。在评估福利方面排名最高的指标是出现自残行为和提供社会丰容。本研究为这些指标的验证提供了实证基础,然后将其纳入为猕猴开发的评估工具中,并强调需要同时包含基于动物和基于环境的指标,以进行准确的福利监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23f6/7683591/6f65e04bc535/41598_2020_77437_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验