Lutz Corrine K
Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, 7620 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;199:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
Abnormal behavior occurs in a number of captive nonhuman primate species and is often used as an indicator of welfare. However, reported levels of abnormal behavior often vary across species, making general welfare judgments difficult. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in levels of abnormal behavior and associated risk factors across three species of Old World monkeys in order to identify similarities and differences across species. The subjects were 415 (109 females) cynomolgus macaques (), 365 (181 females) rhesus macaques (), and 331 (187 females) baboons () that had been singly-housed for 30-120 days. A 5-min observation using one-zero sampling recorded the presence or absence of abnormal behavior for each animal. Macaques exhibited higher levels of abnormal behavior than baboons (29% vs. 14%; χ(1) = 24.849, p < 0.001), but there was no difference between macaque species (30% vs. 28%; χ(1) = 0.263, p = 0.608). Risk factors also varied. Overall, males exhibited greater levels of motor stereotypies ( = 0.425, p < 0.05), females greater levels of abnormal appetitive behavior ( = 1.703, p < 0.05), and older animals greater levels of self-directed behavior ( = 0.065, p < 0.05). However, macaques exhibited greater levels of motor stereotypy ( = 2.527, p < 0.001) and self-directed behavior ( = 2.968, p < 0.005) than did baboons. There was also a genus × sex interaction for abnormal appetitive behavior ( = -2.379, p < 0.01) and a genus × age interaction for motor stereotypy ( = -0.167, p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that differences in abnormal behavior exist across closely-related primate species. Therefore, a single species cannot be used generally as a model for abnormal behavior or animal welfare.
异常行为在许多圈养的非人类灵长类动物物种中都会出现,并且常被用作福利状况的一个指标。然而,所报告的异常行为水平在不同物种间往往存在差异,这使得做出一般性的福利判断变得困难。本研究的目的是评估三种旧世界猴异常行为水平及相关风险因素的差异,以便确定不同物种间的异同。研究对象为415只(109只为雌性)食蟹猕猴、365只(181只为雌性)恒河猴和331只(187只为雌性)狒狒,它们被单独饲养了30至120天。采用全或无抽样法进行5分钟的观察,记录每只动物是否存在异常行为。猕猴表现出的异常行为水平高于狒狒(29%对14%;χ(1)=24.849,p<0.001),但猕猴不同物种之间没有差异(30%对28%;χ(1)=0.263,p=0.608)。风险因素也各不相同。总体而言,雄性表现出更高水平的运动刻板行为(=0.425,p<0.05),雌性表现出更高水平的异常食欲行为(=1.703,p<0.05),年龄较大的动物表现出更高水平的自我导向行为(=0.065,p<0.05)。然而,猕猴表现出的运动刻板行为(=2.527,p<0.001)和自我导向行为(=2.968,p<0.005)比狒狒更高。在异常食欲行为方面还存在属×性别的交互作用(=-2.379,p<0.01),在运动刻板行为方面存在属×年龄的交互作用(=-0.167,p<0.05)。这些结果表明,在亲缘关系密切的灵长类物种间存在异常行为的差异。因此,不能将单一物种普遍用作异常行为或动物福利的模型。