• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Y90 放射性肝段切除术与经皮微波消融治疗<4cm 单发不可切除肝细胞癌的中期疗效评价:倾向评分匹配研究。

Evaluation of Medium-Term Efficacy of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy vs Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Solitary Surgically Unresectable < 4 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Study.

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):401-413. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02712-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-020-02712-1
PMID:33230652
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Y90 radiation segmentectomy (RS) vs. percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with solitary HCC ≤ 4 cm.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2017, 68 consecutive treatment naïve patients were included (34 per treatment arm). Chi-square and t-test were used to evaluate differences in baseline demographics between groups. Objective response was evaluated using mRECIST and toxicity using CTCAE. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in the targeted tumor and the remainder of liver from initial treatment was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Propensity score matching was then performed with n = 24 patients matched in each group. Similar outcome analysis was then pre-formed.

RESULTS

In the overall study population, both groups had similar baseline characteristics with the exception of larger lesions in the RS group. There was no difference in toxicity, objective tumor response, OS and non-target liver PFS between the MWA and RS group (p's > 0.05). In the matched cohort, the objective tumor response was 82.6% in MWA vs. 90.9%% in RS (p = 0.548). The mean OS in the MWA group (44.3 months) vs RS (59.0 months; p = 0.203). The targeted tumor mean PFS for the MWA groups was 38.6 months vs. 57.8 months in RS group (p = 0.005). There was no difference overall PFS and toxicity between the 2 matched groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest Y90 RS achieves similar tumor response and OS with a similar safety compared to MWA in the management of HCC lesions ≤ 4 cm. Additionally, targeted tumor PFS appears to be prolonged in the RS group with similar non-target liver PFS between RS and MWA group.

摘要

目的

评估 Y90 放射切除术(RS)与经皮微波消融(MWA)治疗直径≤4cm 单发 HCC 的疗效和安全性。

方法

2014 年至 2017 年,纳入 68 例初治患者(每组 34 例)。采用卡方检验和 t 检验比较两组患者的基线人口统计学差异。采用 mRECIST 评估客观反应,采用 CTCAE 评估毒性。采用 Kaplan-Meier 估计计算初始治疗后靶肿瘤和剩余肝的总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)。然后采用倾向评分匹配(n=24 例)对每组进行匹配,并进行类似的结果分析。

结果

在总体研究人群中,两组患者的基线特征相似,除 RS 组的肿瘤较大外。两组间的毒性、肿瘤客观反应、OS 和非靶肝 PFS 无差异(p>0.05)。在匹配队列中,MWA 组的客观肿瘤反应为 82.6%,RS 组为 90.9%(p=0.548)。MWA 组的平均 OS 为 44.3 个月,RS 组为 59.0 个月(p=0.203)。MWA 组的靶肿瘤平均 PFS 为 38.6 个月,RS 组为 57.8 个月(p=0.005)。两组之间的总 PFS 和毒性无差异。

结论

我们的数据表明,Y90 RS 在治疗直径≤4cm 的 HCC 病变时,与 MWA 相比,肿瘤反应和 OS 相似,安全性相似。此外,RS 组的靶肿瘤 PFS 似乎延长,而 RS 组和 MWA 组的非靶肝 PFS 相似。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Medium-Term Efficacy of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy vs Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Solitary Surgically Unresectable < 4 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Study.Y90 放射性肝段切除术与经皮微波消融治疗<4cm 单发不可切除肝细胞癌的中期疗效评价:倾向评分匹配研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):401-413. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02712-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Radiation Segmentectomy versus TACE Combined with Microwave Ablation for Unresectable Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Up to 3 cm: A Propensity Score Matching Study.放射性肝段切除术与 TACE 联合微波消融治疗不可切除的 3cm 以下单发肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Radiology. 2017 Jun;283(3):895-905. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160718. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
3
Transarterial Chemoembolization Monotherapy Versus Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization-Microwave Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors ≤5 cm: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center.经动脉化疗栓塞单药治疗与经动脉化疗栓塞-微波消融联合治疗≤5厘米肝细胞癌肿瘤的疗效比较:单中心倾向分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1748-1755. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1736-8. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
Microwave ablation for peribiliary hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score analyses of long-term outcomes.微波消融治疗胆管旁肝细胞癌:长期疗效的倾向评分分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):191-201. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1706766.
5
Microwave ablation versus sorafenib for intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness: a propensity score matching analysis.经导管动脉化疗栓塞耐药的中期肝细胞癌行微波消融与索拉非尼治疗的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):384-391. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1752400.
6
Long-term efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to the gallbladder with a diameter ≤ 5 cm: a multicenter, propensity score matching study.微波消融治疗直径≤5cm 胆囊旁肝癌的长期疗效及安全性:多中心倾向性评分匹配研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2023;40(1):2248425. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2248425.
7
Benefits of step-by-step debulking microwave ablation for huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness.经导管动脉化疗栓塞耐药后分步消融为巨大不可切除肝细胞癌患者行微波消融的获益。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):935-945. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2093413.
8
Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.微波消融与射频消融治疗血管周围肝细胞癌的疗效比较:倾向评分分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Apr;23(4):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
9
Single medium-sized hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation at 4 weeks versus cTACE alone: a propensity score.4 周时序常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞(cTACE)联合微波消融与单纯 cTACE 治疗单个中等大小肝细胞癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02643-w.
10
Unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to radiofrequency ablation: multicenter radiology-pathology correlation and survival of radiation segmentectomy.不可切除的单发肝细胞癌不适合射频消融:多中心放射科-病理相关性和放射段切除术的生存。
Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):192-201. doi: 10.1002/hep.27057. Epub 2014 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Modern approach to hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.肝细胞癌治疗的现代方法。
World J Hepatol. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):107873. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107873.
2
The Evolving Application of Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Hepatic Malignancy.肝段切除术在肝脏恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用进展
Radiology. 2025 Jul;316(1):e240333. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240333.
3
Radiation Segmentectomy or Ablative External Beam Radiation Therapy as Initial Treatment for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Experience.肝段切除术或外照射消融放疗作为孤立性肝细胞癌的初始治疗:一项多中心经验
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 Mar 13;12:553-559. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S507267. eCollection 2025.
4
Selective internal radiation therapy across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages of hepatocellular carcinoma: literature review.肝细胞癌巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)各阶段的选择性内放射治疗:文献综述
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):974-990. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-504. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Radiation Segmentectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝癌的放射段切除术。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jan 23;31(2):617-628. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31020045.
6
Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Practical Review of Evidence.肝段切除术治疗肝细胞癌:证据的实用综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 4;16(3):669. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030669.
7
Ablation versus Radiation Segmentectomy for Small Liver Tumors.小肝癌的消融与放射节段性肝切除术
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jan 24;40(6):511-514. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777714. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Optimal treatment for small HCC (<3 cm): Resection, liver transplantation, or locoregional therapy?小肝癌(<3厘米)的最佳治疗方法:手术切除、肝移植还是局部区域治疗?
JHEP Rep. 2023 Apr 25;5(8):100781. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100781. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Microwave ablation for hepatic malignancies: a systematic review of the technology and differences in devices.微波消融治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤:技术及设备差异的系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):817-834. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09567-2. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
10
Biochemical Safety of Ablative Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma as a Function of Percent Liver Treated.作为肝脏治疗百分比函数的钇-90消融性放射性栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的生化安全性
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Jul 30;8:861-870. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S319215. eCollection 2021.