Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430079, China.
School of Psychology, Central China Normal University (CCNU), Wuhan, 430079, China.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jan;83(1):331-355. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02176-y. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
Timing can be processed explicitly or implicitly. Temporal orienting is a typical implicit timing through which we can anticipate and prepare an optimized response to forthcoming events. It is, however, not yet clear whether mechanisms such as temporal-pulse accumulation and attentional gating (more attention, more accumulated temporal pulses) underly the internal representations of temporal orienting, as in explicit timing. To clarify this, a dual-task paradigm, consisting of a temporal orienting and an interference task, was adopted. Consistent with the temporal-pulse-accumulation and attentional-gating model, reaction times to the target detection of temporal orienting increased as the interference stimuli were temporally closer to the target, i.e., a location effect for temporal orienting. This effect is likely due to attention being diverted away from temporal orienting to monitor the occurrence of the interference stimuli for a longer time, resulting in greater temporal pulse loss and less accurate temporal orienting for conditions with later interference stimuli. The temporal-pulse-accumulation aspect in temporal orienting received further support by taking an explicit duration reproduction (containing a second temporal-pulse accumulation) as the interference task. On the one hand, temporal orienting became less accurate with increased temporal-pulse-accumulation overlaps between the dual tasks; on the other hand, two-way (one for temporal orienting and the other for duration reproduction), rather than one-way, location effects were observed, implying processing conflicts between the two temporal-pulse accumulations. Taken together, these results suggest that implicit and explicit timing may share common mechanisms upon internal temporal representations.
时间可以被明确或隐含地处理。时间定向是一种典型的隐含时间处理,通过这种处理,我们可以预测并准备对即将到来的事件做出优化的反应。然而,目前尚不清楚时间脉冲积累和注意门控(更多的注意力,更多的累积时间脉冲)等机制是否构成了时间定向的内部表示,就像在明确的时间处理中那样。为了澄清这一点,采用了一种双任务范式,由时间定向和干扰任务组成。与时间脉冲积累和注意门控模型一致,随着干扰刺激在时间上更接近目标,即时间定向的位置效应,时间定向的目标检测反应时间增加。这种效应可能是由于注意力从时间定向转移到监测干扰刺激的发生,导致时间脉冲损失更大,对于较晚的干扰刺激条件下的时间定向准确性降低。将明确的持续时间再现(包含第二个时间脉冲积累)作为干扰任务,进一步支持了时间定向中的时间脉冲积累方面。一方面,随着双任务之间的时间脉冲积累重叠增加,时间定向的准确性降低;另一方面,观察到双向(一个用于时间定向,另一个用于持续时间再现)而不是单向的位置效应,暗示两个时间脉冲积累之间存在处理冲突。综上所述,这些结果表明,隐含和明确的时间处理可能在内部时间表示上共享共同的机制。