San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 6363 Alvarado Court, Suite 103, San Diego, CA, 92120, United States.
San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 6363 Alvarado Court, Suite 103, San Diego, CA, 92120, United States; Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, College of Sciences, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, United States.
Body Image. 2021 Mar;36:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
Prior research has established that sexual minority (SM) individuals are more likely to experience disordered body image behaviors and concerns than heterosexual individuals. This increased risk may be explained by minority stress theory - that SM individuals are subject to SM-specific stressors, leading to health disparities - but this has not yet been fully examined. Furthermore, this theory states that SM community involvement may mitigate negative outcomes. The current study examines whether minority stress is associated with screening positive for an eating disorder, screening positive for body dysmorphic disorder, and appearance- and performance-enhancing drug misuse in a sample of SM individuals (483 women and 479 men) in the US. This study also examines whether the effect of minority stress is moderated by SM community involvement. Logistic regressions were conducted for each type of minority stress (internalized homophobia, sexual orientation concealment, and heterosexist discrimination) interacting with community involvement. After correction for multiple comparisons, all minority stressors and community involvement were positively associated with increased odds of disordered body image behaviors and concerns, with no evidence of a buffering effect for community involvement. The lack of a buffering effect is contrary to minority stress theory and may inform future prevention efforts.
先前的研究已经证实,性少数群体(SM)个体比异性恋个体更有可能出现紊乱的身体意象行为和问题。这种风险增加可能可以用少数群体应激理论来解释——即 SM 个体面临特定于 SM 的应激源,导致健康差距——但这尚未得到充分研究。此外,该理论指出,SM 社区的参与可能会减轻负面结果。本研究在美国的 SM 个体样本(483 名女性和 479 名男性)中,检验了少数群体应激与饮食障碍筛查阳性、身体变形障碍筛查阳性以及外貌和表现增强型药物滥用之间的关系。本研究还检验了少数群体应激的影响是否受 SM 社区参与的调节。对于每种类型的少数群体应激(内化的恐同症、性取向隐瞒和异性恋歧视)与社区参与的相互作用,进行了逻辑回归。在进行多次比较校正后,所有的少数群体应激源和社区参与都与紊乱的身体意象行为和问题的可能性增加呈正相关,没有社区参与的缓冲作用的证据。社区参与缺乏缓冲作用与少数群体应激理论相悖,这可能为未来的预防工作提供信息。