Suppr超能文献

历史、词源与谬误:古代西方世界对男性自慰的态度

History, etymology, and fallacy: attitudes toward male masturbation in the ancient Western world.

作者信息

Elia J P

机构信息

CERES, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.

出版信息

J Homosex. 1987;14(3-4):1-19. doi: 10.1300/J082v14n03_01.

Abstract

This article examines the attitudes toward male masturbation in the ancient western world. More specifically, this work deals with ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome. By comparing each epoch and geographic region, intolerance of autoerotic activity can be seen. Although there is a pattern of intolerance, the act of masturbation is always viewed provisionally. In addition, by examining these three periods of history not only can attitudes be scrutinized, but also it can be seen quite clearly that there was no golden age of sexuality: The attitude of accepted and encouraged unlimited and varied sexual practices does not exist in the ancient western world. As in many other cultures in various stages of history, procreative sexuality is the dominating theme. Thus, current attitudes of sex are derived from, and still survive due to the influence of, ancient western civilization.

摘要

本文探讨了古代西方世界对男性自慰的态度。更具体地说,这项研究涉及古埃及、希腊和罗马。通过比较每个时代和地理区域,可以看出对自慰行为的不容忍。尽管存在不容忍的模式,但自慰行为总是被临时看待。此外,通过研究这三个历史时期,不仅可以审视态度,还能清楚地看到不存在性的黄金时代:在古代西方世界,接受并鼓励无限制、多样的性行为的态度并不存在。正如历史各个阶段的许多其他文化一样,生殖性性行为是主导主题。因此,当前的性观念源于古代西方文明,并因其影响而仍然存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验