Cardiac Surgery Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Oct 16;23(6):E774-E780. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3185.
To evaluate the effect of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) simulator for cardiac residency training.
A total of 26 resident surgeons who had never trained for coronary artery anastomosis participated in this training program. They received coronary artery anastomosis training on off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) simulator for 15 h. After training, their performance of anastomosis was evaluated on the OPCAB simulator according to 12 items and a 5-point global rating scale. Based on the total score of assessment, those with an individual score of 12-36 formed group A, while group B was composed of the remaining trainees. The two groups then received another 15 h coronary artery anastomosis training on the MIDCAB simulator, and the performance was assessed.
Trainees improved their performance of coronary artery anastomosis after training on the OPCAB simulator. Group A was composed of 7 trainees with an individual with a total score of 12-36 points and group B was composed of the remaining 19 trainees. After MIDCAB simulator training, significant differences were noted in the pre- and post-training values in the A group (P < .001), and the assessment value of group A was significantly better than those of group B (P < .05). No significant difference was detected between pre- and post-training values in group B after MIDCAB simulator training (P > .05).
We concluded that trainees who performed well in OPCAB simulation training can also perform better in MIDCAB, and our designed MIDCAB simulator was useful for residency training.
评估微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术(MIDCAB)模拟器在心脏住院医师培训中的效果。
共有 26 名从未接受过冠状动脉吻合术培训的住院医师参与了该培训计划。他们在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)模拟器上接受了 15 小时的冠状动脉吻合术培训。培训后,根据 12 项和 5 分制的整体评分标准,在 OPCAB 模拟器上评估他们的吻合术表现。根据评估的总分,个体得分在 12-36 分的入组 A,其余的入组 B。然后,两组人员在 MIDCAB 模拟器上再接受 15 小时的冠状动脉吻合术培训,并对其表现进行评估。
住院医师在 OPCAB 模拟器上接受培训后,其冠状动脉吻合术的表现得到了提高。组 A 由 7 名个体总分在 12-36 分的住院医师组成,组 B 由其余 19 名住院医师组成。在 MIDCAB 模拟器培训后,A 组的培训前后评估值存在显著差异(P<0.001),且 A 组的评估值明显优于 B 组(P<0.05)。B 组在 MIDCAB 模拟器培训后,其培训前后评估值无显著差异(P>0.05)。
我们得出结论,在 OPCAB 模拟培训中表现良好的住院医师也可以在 MIDCAB 中表现更好,并且我们设计的 MIDCAB 模拟器对住院医师培训是有用的。