Van der Loo Lars E, Aquarius René, Teernstra Onno, Klijn Karin, Menovsky Tomas, van Dijk J Marc C, Bartels Ronald, Boogaarts Hieronymus Damianus
Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 24;11(11):CD009280. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009280.pub3.
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Retrospective clinical and animal studies have demonstrated neuroprotective effects of iron chelators in people with haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke. This is the first update of the original Cochrane Review published in 2012.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of iron-chelating drugs in people with acute stroke.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (2 September 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 9; 2 September 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (2 September 2019), Embase Ovid (2 September 2019), and Science Citation Index (2 September 2019). We also searched ongoing trials registers.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of iron chelators versus no iron chelators or placebo for the treatment of acute stroke, including subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Two review authors independently screened the search results. We obtained the full texts of potentially relevant studies and evaluated them for eligibility. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
Two RCTs (333 participants) were eligible for inclusion; both compared the iron-chelating agent deferoxamine against placebo. Both studies evaluated participants with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. We assessed one study to have a low risk of bias; the other study had potential sources of bias. The limited and heterogeneous data did not allow for meta-analysis of the outcome parameters. The evidence suggests that administration of deferoxamine may result in little to no difference in deaths (8% in placebo vs 8% in deferoxamine at 180 days; 1 RCT, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). These RCTs suggest that there may be little to no difference in good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2) between groups at 30, 90 and 180 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 67% vs 57% at 30 days and 36% vs 45% at 180 days; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). One RCT suggests that administration of deferoxamine may not increase the number of serious adverse events or deaths (placebo vs deferoxamine: 33% vs 27% at 180 days; risk ratio 0.81, 95 % confidence interval 0.57 to 1.16; 1 RCT, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data were available on any deaths within the treatment period. Deferoxamine may result in little to no difference in the evolution of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores from baseline to 90 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 13 to 4 vs 13 to 3; P = 0.37; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). Deferoxamine may slightly reduce relative oedema surrounding intracerebral haemorrhage at 15 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 1.91 vs 10.26; P = 0.042; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). Neither study reported quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified two eligible RCTs for assessment. We could not demonstrate any benefit for the use of iron chelators in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. The added value of iron-chelating therapy in people with ischaemic stroke or subarachnoid haemorrhage remains unknown.
中风是全球第二大致死原因和主要致残原因。回顾性临床和动物研究表明,铁螯合剂对出血性或缺血性中风患者具有神经保护作用。这是2012年发表的原始Cochrane系统评价的首次更新。
评估铁螯合药物对急性中风患者的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane中风组试验注册库(2019年9月2日)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2019年第9期;2019年9月2日)、MEDLINE Ovid(2019年9月2日)、Embase Ovid(2019年9月2日)和科学引文索引(2019年9月2日)。我们还检索了正在进行的试验注册库。
我们纳入了铁螯合剂与非铁螯合剂或安慰剂治疗急性中风(包括蛛网膜下腔出血)的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位综述作者独立筛选检索结果。我们获取了潜在相关研究的全文并评估其是否符合纳入标准。我们使用Cochrane“偏倚风险”工具评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。
两项RCT(333名参与者)符合纳入标准;两项试验均比较了铁螯合剂去铁胺与安慰剂。两项研究均评估了自发性脑出血患者。我们评估其中一项研究偏倚风险较低;另一项研究存在潜在偏倚来源。有限且异质性的数据不允许对结局参数进行Meta分析。证据表明,使用去铁胺可能在死亡方面几乎没有差异(180天时安慰剂组为8%,去铁胺组为8%;1项RCT,291名参与者;低确定性证据)。这些RCT表明,在30天、90天和180天时,两组之间良好功能结局(改良Rankin量表评分0至2)可能几乎没有差异(30天时安慰剂组与去铁胺组:67%对57%;180天时36%对45%;2项RCT,333名参与者;低确定性证据)。一项RCT表明去铁胺的使用可能不会增加严重不良事件或死亡的数量(180天时安慰剂组与去铁胺组:33%对27%;风险比0.81,95%置信区间0.57至1.16;1项RCT,291名参与者;低确定性证据)。治疗期间无任何死亡数据。去铁胺从基线到90天的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分变化可能几乎没有差异(安慰剂组与去铁胺组:13至4对13至3;P = 0.37;2项RCT,333名参与者;低确定性证据)。去铁胺可能在15天时略微减轻脑内出血周围的相对水肿(安慰剂组与去铁胺组:1.91对10.26;P = 0.042;2项RCT,333名参与者;低确定性证据)。两项研究均未报告生活质量。
我们确定了两项符合评估标准的RCT。我们无法证明在自发性脑内出血中使用铁螯合剂有任何益处。铁螯合疗法对缺血性中风或蛛网膜下腔出血患者的附加价值仍然未知。